Association of Ejaculate Sperm Counts with their Morphological and Morphometric Characteristics in Hypor Boars


Reproductive efficiency in pigs is largely dependent on the fertility of the boar. Boars used at insemination stations should produce a large amount of semen with high fertilization capacity. The sperm count influences the conception rate and the number of insemination doses produced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphological and morphometric characteristics of boars of the Hypor breed in relation to the total sperm count in the ejaculate. An analysis was performed of 120 ejaculates collected from 12 Hypor boars used at three insemination stations. The ejaculate sperm count was found to affect the morphometric characteristics of spermatozoa from boars. In the ejaculates with the lowest sperm count the spermatozoa heads were significantly shorter and narrower and had a smaller surface area. The sperm from ejaculates with the lowest sperm count had relatively small head dimensions in relation to the tail length and total sperm length. In the ejaculates with the most sperm cells, the proportion of spermatozoa with major defects was significantly greater than in the ejaculates from other groups. In the ejaculates with the lowest sperm count the frequency of sperm with progressive motility was significantly lower. The fewest insemination doses can be prepared from these ejaculates.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arnaud L., Haubruge E., Gage M.J.G. (2001). Sperm size and number variation in the red flour beetle. Zool. J. Linn. Soc-Lond., 133: 369–375.

  • Bierła J.B., Giżejewski Z., Leigh C.M., Ekwall H., Söderquist L., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Zalewski K., Breed W.G. (2007). Sperm morphology of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber: an example of a species of rodent with highly derived and pleiomorphic sperm populations. J. Morphol., 268: 683–689.

  • Blom E. (1981). The morphological estimation of the spermatozoa defects of bull II: The proposal of new classification of spermatozoa defects (in Polish). Med. Weter., 37: 239–242.

  • Calogero A.E., De Palma A., Grazioso C., Barone N., Romeo R., Rapazzo G., D’Agata R. (2001). Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with abnormal semen parameters. Hum. Reprod., 16: 1172–1179.

  • Casey P.J., Gravance C.G., Davis R.O., Chabot D.D., Liu I.K.M. (1997). Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions. Theriogenology, 47: 575–582.

  • Chenoweth P.J. (2005). Genetic sperm defects. Theriogenology, 64: 457–468.

  • De Jarnette J.M., Saake R.G., Barne J., Volger C.J. (1992). Accessory sperm: their importance to fertility and embryo quality and attempts to alter their numbers in artificially inseminated cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 484–491.

  • Enciso M., Cisale H., Johnston S.D., Sarasa J., Fernandez J.L., Gosalvez J. (2011). Major morphological sperm abnormalities in the bull are related to sperm DNA damage. Theriogenology, 76: 23–32.

  • Evenson D.P., Wixon R. (2006). Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology, 65: 979–991.

  • Fischer M.A., Willis J., Zini A. (2003). Human sperm DNA integrity: correlation with sperm cytoplasmic droplets. Urology, 61: 207–211.

  • Gage M.J.G., Morrow E.H. (2003). Experimental evidence for the evolution of numerous, tiny sperm via sperm competition. Curr. Biol., 13: 754–757.

  • Gil M.C., Garcia-Herreros M., Baron F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., Garcia-Marin L.J. (2009). Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology, 71: 254–263.

  • Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Nazaruk A. (2016). The importance of ejaculate volume for the physical parameters of ejaculates and sperm morphology of Hypor boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 22: 493–501.

  • Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A. (2017). Ejaculate traits and sperm morphology depending on ejaculate volume in Duroc boars. J. Vet. Res., 61: 121–125.

  • Hirai M., Boersma A., Hofflich A., Wolf E., Föll J., Aumüller R., Braun A.J. (2001). Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J. Androl., 22: 104–110.

  • King G.J., Macpherson J.W. (1973). A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J. Anim. Sci., 36: 563–565.

  • Knecht D., Środoń S., Duziński K. (2014). The influence of boar breed and season on semen parameters. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 1–9.

  • Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Mielnicka C. (2005). The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 10: 3–13.

  • Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Wysokińska A., Sadowska A. (2006). Ejaculate traits and spermatozoa morphology as related to spermatozoa concentration in ejaculates of Polish Large White boars. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., Suppl., 3: 111–119.

  • Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Górski K. (2013). The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch. Tierzucht, 56: 1052–1059.

  • Kondracki S., Górski K., Wysokińska A., Jóźwik I. (2014). Correlation of ejaculate parameters and sperm morphology with the ejaculate volume of Pietrain boars. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 20: 703–709.

  • Kowalewski D., Kondracki S., Górski K., Bajena M., Wysokińska A. (2016). Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 22: 225–232.

  • Kubo-Irie M., Matsumiya K., Iwamoto T., Kaneko S., Ishijima S. (2005). Morphological abnormalities in the spermatozoa of fertile and infertile men. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 70: 70–81.

  • Long J.A., Wildt D.E., Wolfe B.A., Critser J.K., De Rossi R.V., Howard J.G. (1996). Sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction are compromised in teratospermic domestic cats. Biol. Reprod., 54: 638–646.

  • Malo A.F., Gomendio M., Garde J., Lang-Lenton B., Soler A.J., Roldan E.R.S. (2006). Sperm design and sperm function. Biol. Lett., 2: 246–249.

  • Noorafshan A., Karbalay-Doust S. (2010). A simple method for unbiased estimating of ejaculated sperm tail length in subjects with normal and abnormal sperm motility. Micron, 41: 96–99.

  • Ostermeier G.C., Sargeant G.A., Yandell B.S., Evenson D.P., Parrish J.J. (2001). Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. J. Androl., 22: 595–603.

  • Pinart E., Camps R., Briz M.O., Bonet S., Egozcue J. (1998). Unilateral spontaneous abdominal cryptorchidism: structural and ultrastructural study of sperm morphology. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 49: 247–268.

  • Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development (2010). The Journal of Laws of 15 February, 2010, No. 56, Pos. 344.

  • Ruiz-Sanchez A.I., O’Donoghue R., Novak S., Dyck M.K., Cosgrove J.R., Dixon W.T., Foxcroft G.R. (2006). The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility. Theriogenology, 66: 736-748.

  • Smital J., De Sousa L.L., Mohnsen A. (2004). Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 80: 121-130.

  • Steinholt H.C., Chandler J.E., Baron R.A., Adkinson R.W. (1994). Chromosome and sperm size of Holsteins with and without bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency. J. Dairy Sci., 77: 1239-1250.

  • Sun F., Ko R., Martin R.H. (2006). Is there a relationship between sperm chromosome abnormalities and sperm morphology? Reprod. Biol. Endocrin., 4: 1-15.

  • Swine Nutrition Requirements (1993). The Kielanowski Institute Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences. Omnitech-Press, Warsaw, Poland.

  • Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V. (2001). Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J. Androl., 22: 382-394.

  • Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2013). Assessment of the effect of heterosis on semen parameters of two-breed crosses of Duroc, Hampshire and Pietrain boars. Arch. Tierzucht, 56: 65-74.

  • Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2014 a). Assessment of changes in sperm cell membrane integrity occurring during the storage of semen from genetically different males using two diagnostic methods. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 94: 601–606.

  • Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2014 b). Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 559-571.

  • Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Banaszewska D. (2009). Morphometrical characteristics of spermatozoa in Polish Landrace boars with regard to the number of spermatozoa in an ejaculate. Reprod. Biol., 9: 271-282.

  • Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Iwanina M. (2015). The usefulness of selected physicochemical indices, cell membrane integrity and sperm chromatin structure in assessments of boar semen sensitivity. Asian Austral. J. Anim., 28: 1713-1720.

  • Zheng H., Stratton C.J., Morozumi K., Jin J., Yanagimachi R., Yan W. (2007). Lack of Spem 1 causes aberrant cytoplasm removal, sperm deformation, and male infertility. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104: 6852-6857.


Journal + Issues