Sigmoid Models for the Growth Curves in Medium-Growing Meat Type Chickens, Raised under Semi-Confined Conditions

Monika Michalczuk 1 , Krzysztof Damaziak 1 ,  and Antoni Goryl 2
  • 1 Department of Poultry Breeding, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa, Poland
  • 2 Department of Econometrics and Operational Research, Cracow University of Economics, Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland


The study analyzed the growth of medium-growing chickens of the CCGP experimental line, using Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models as well as body gain curves. The birds were reared until 9 wk of age. To fit BW values to the applied models, determination coefficients (R2

2) and standard error of the mean (±SE) were calculated for 487 male and 493 female chickens. The comparison of results obtained demonstrated the Gompertz model to be the most precise equation to describe the growth of both sexes of CCGP chickens, though in all examined models the determination coefficients were approximating 99%. According to the Gompertz model, the chickens may reach the maximum BW at the age of 16 wk (5900 g - males and 4000 g - females), whereas the maximum daily BW gain - on day 47 (69.0 g) in males and on day 41 (50.0 g) in females. Values achieved in the Logistic model were the most diverging from the values obtained with other models, whereas the Richards model may be successfully applied to estimate BW of chickens. Females were reaching the maximum BW gains earlier, but the curve of their BW gain was proceeding with two peaks (at ca. 4 wk - 313.09 g/wk and at 6 wk - 327.59 g/wk), which was probably due to partial growth deceleration as a result of allowing the birds to use free ranges on day 14. In the case of males, the maximum BW gain (727.35 g/wk) was reached at 6.2 wk.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aggrey S.E. (2002). Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves. Poultry Sci., 81: 1782-1788.

  • AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th Edition. Association of Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA .

  • Darmani Kuhi H., Kebreab E., Lopez S., France J. (2003). Acomparative evaluation of functions for the analysis of growth in male broilers. J. Agric. Sci. Camb., 140: 451-459.

  • Eleroğlu H., Yıldırım A., Şekeroğlu A., Çoksöyler F.N., Duman M. (2014). Comparison of growth curves by growth models in slow-growing chicken genotypes raised the organic system. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 16: 529-535.

  • Ersoy I.E., Mendeş M., Aktan S. (2006). Growth curves establishment for American Bronze turkeys (short communication). Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf, 49: 293-299.

  • Gille U., Salomon F.V. (1998). Muscle growth in wild and domestics ducks. Brit. Poultry Sci., 39: 500-506.

  • Maracato S.M., Sakomura N.K., Munari D.P., Fernandes J.B.K., Kawauchi I.M., Bonato M.A. (2008). Growth and body nutrient deposition of two broiler commercial genetic lines. Brit. Poultry Sci., 10: 117-123.

  • Michalczuk M., Damaziak K., Łukasiewicz M., Tokarska G. (2013). Three genetic material of broiler chickens growth evaluation. Proc. 25th Inter. Poult. Symp. PB WPSA, Zegrze near Warsaw, pp. 166-167.

  • Mignon-Grasteau S., Beaumont C. (2000). Growth curves in birds (in France). INRA Prod. Anim., 13: 337-348.

  • Nahashon S.N., Aggrey S.E., Adefope N.A., Amenyenu A. (2006 a). Modeling growth characteristics of meat-type guinea fowl. Poultry Sci., 85: 943-946.

  • Nahashon S.N., Aggrey S.E., Adefope N.A., Amenyenu A., Wright D. (2006 b). Growth characteristics of pearl gray guinea fowl as predicted by the Richards, Gompertz, and Logistic Models. Poultry Sci., 85: 359-363.

  • Narinc D., Aksoy T., Karama E., Ilaslan Curek D. (2010). Analysis of fitting growth models in medium growing chicken raised indoor system. Trends Anim. Vet. Sci. J., 1: 12-18.

  • N’dri A.L., Mignon-Grasteau S., Sellier S., Tixier-Boichard M., Beaumont C. (2006). Genetic relationship between feed conversion ratio, growth curve and body composition in slow growing chickens. Brit. Poultry Sci., 47: 273-280.

  • Pérez- Lara E., Camacho- Escobra M.A., García- López J.C., Machorro-Sama - no S., Ávila-Serrano A.Y., Arroyo-Ledezma J. (2014). Mathematical modeling of the native Mexican turkey’s growth. Open J. Anim. Sci., 3: 305-310.

  • Porter T., Kebreab E., Darmani Kuhi H., Lopez S., Strathe A.B., France J. (2010). Flexible alternatives to the growth Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Sci., 89: 371-378.

  • Richards F.J. (1959). Aflexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot., 10: 290-300.

  • Robertson T.B. (1923). The chemical basis of growth and senescence. Monographs of Experimental Biology. J. B. Lippincott Cie., Philadelphia, PA.

  • Saber S.N., Maheri-Sis N., Shaddel- Telli A., Hatefinezhad K., Gorbani A., Yousefi J. (2011). Effect of feed restriction on growth performance of broiler chickens. Ann. Biol. Res., 2: 247-252.

  • Santos A.L., Sakomura N.K., Freitas E.R., Fortes C.M.S., Carrilho E.N.V.M. (2005). Comparison of free range broiler chicken strain raised in confined or semi-confined systems. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avicola, 7: 85-92.

  • Thornley J.H., France J. (2007). Mathematical Models in Agriculture. CABI Publ., Wallingford, UK, 2nd ed., pp. 136-169.

  • Wang J., Zuidhof M.J. (2004). Estimation of growth parameters usinganonlinear mixed Gompertz model. Poultry Sci., 83: 847-852.

  • Zubair A.K., Leeson S. (1996). Compensatory growth in the broiler chicken:areview. World. Poultry Sci. J., 52: 189-201.


Journal + Issues