Electrophysiological study on co and co2 euthanasia in mink (Mustela vison)

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to define at what time point animal is dying and how quickly changes in the function of brain and heart can be observed. Four groups of sedated standard dark male mink (Mustela vison) were tested: euthanasia with filtered exhaust gases (CO concentration in the killing box 4%, 8 animals), carbon dioxide (CO2 from a cylinder, concentration in the killing box 80%, 8 animals), carbon monoxide (CO from a cylinder, concentration in the killing box 4%, 9 animals) and euthanasia with carbon monoxide (CO from a cylinder, concentration in the killing box 2%, 6 animals). Brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER), electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG) and respiratory rate were measured before and during euthanasia. Mean time of decline/absent BAER was 112/176, 138/183, 235/390 and 528/833 seconds after gas application in groups, respectively. Mean time for first changes/absence of EEG was 42/86, 39/75, 55/190 and 176/426 seconds after gas application in groups, respectively. Mean time for first changes in respiration/absent breathing was 42/217, 28/227, 144/477 and 331/901 seconds after gas application in groups, respectively. Mean time for first changes/absence of ECG was 105/292, 117/220, 215/289 and 481/682 seconds after gas application in groups, respectively. Our results indicate that the studied gases first affect brain and brainstem which was seen as loss of EEG and BAER and just thereafter respiration and heart rate in turn. While sensitivity to pain is essentially related to consciousness and function of brain, gases can be considered to primarily and effectively lead to state of non-pain. Particularly the death with the filtered exhaust CO and the cylinder CO2 gases occurs quickly and in very comparable times. The euthanasia with the cylinder CO of 2% concentration seems to be too long and is most likely not suitable for the mink euthanasia in general. Observable signs of marked irritation or aversion were not found during exposure to studied CO and CO2 gases.

AVMA (2007). AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. Am. Vet. Med. Ass., June 2007, 27 pp. (Formerly the Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia).

Cooper J., Mason G., Raj M. (1998). Determination of the aversion of farmed mink (Mustela vison) to carbon dioxide. Vet. Rec., 143: 359-361.

Council of the European Union (2009). Proposal for Council Regulation on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Council of the European Union, Brussels, 16 June 2009, Interinstitutional file: 2008/0180 (CNS).

EFBA (1999). Code of practice for the care and handling of farmed mink, fitch and fox in Europe. Coordinated and issued by European Fur Breeders’ Association. 2nd edition, September 1999, 18 pp.

EFBA (2008). EFBA’s response to the Revision of Council Directive 93/119/EC on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing. November 2008, Bruxelles, Belgium, 9 pp.

Finley G.G. (1980). Humane euthanasia (killing) of pelter mink. Scientifur, 4: 13-15.

Fitzhugh D.C., Parmer A., Shelton L.J., Sheets J.T. (2008). A comparative analysis of cardon dioxide displacement rates for euthanasia of the ferret. Lab. Anim., 37 (2): 81-86.

Gierløff B.C.H. (1980 a). Humane euthanasia of Danish Pelter mink with Thiopentone in contrast to killing with Chloral-hydrate. Dan. Vet. Tidskr., 63 (2): 3-4.

Gierløff B. (1980 b). Use of hydrate and pentobarbital to kill mink. A comparative study (in Danish). Dan. Vet. Tidskr., 63 (23): 943-953.

Hansen N., Creutzberg A., Simonsen H.B. (1991). Euthanasia of mink (Mustela vison) by means of carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen (N2). Br. Vet. J., 147 (2): 140-146.

Jepsen Ø.R., Poulsen Dirch J.S., Jorgensen G. (1981). Collection of blood, sedation and anaesthesia in mink: A haematological and clinical-chemical study. Nord. Vet. Med., Suppl. 1, 99 pp.

Korhonen H.T., Cizinauskas S., Viitmaa R. (2009). Evaluation of the traditional way of euthanasia of farmed foxes from an animal welfare point of view. Ann. Anim. Sci., 9: 73-87.

Korhonen H., Sepponen J., Eskeli P. (2011 a). A questionnaire study on euthanasia in farmed mink. Report No 2, 25 pp.

Korhonen H.T., Eskeli P., Sepponen J., Toikkanen P. (2011 b). Individual and group euthanasia in farmed mink: Behavioural study. Report No 3, 21 pp.

Lamboy E., Roelofs J.A.,van Voorst N. (1985). Euthanasia of mink with carbon monoxide. Vet. Rec., 116, p. 416.

Loftsgård G. (1980). Euthanasia of mink. A review of the methods used to kill mink before pelting (in Norwegian). Norsk Vet. Tidskr., 82: 492-496.

Loftsgård G., Braathen S., Helgebostad A. (1972). Electrical stunning of mink. Vet. Rec., 91: 132-134.

Löliger H.Ch. (1984). The euthanasia of fur bearing animals for pelting. Proc. 3rd International Scientific Congress on Fur Animal Production. Versailles, France, Communication no. 54.

Makowska I.J., Vickers L., Mancell J., Weary D.M. (2009). Evaluating methods of gas euthanasia for laboratory mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 12: 230-235.

Raj M., Mason G. (1999). Reaction of farmed mink (Mustela vison) to argon-induced hypoxia. Vet. Rec., 145: 736-737.

Siegel S., Castellan N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for behavioral sciences. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill International Editions, Statistics Series, 399 pp.

Von Oettingen W.F. (1944). Public Health Bulletin No 290, Washington (referred by Carding, 1977).

Annals of Animal Science

The Journal of National Research Institute of Animal Production

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.018
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.959



CiteScore 2017: 1.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.413
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.822

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 139 139 14
PDF Downloads 43 43 3