Influence of Musical Experience of Blind and Visually Impaired Young Persons on Performance in Selected Auditory Tasks

Open access

Abstract

The impact of musical experience on results concerning sound perception in selected auditory tasks, such as pitch discrimination, pitch-timbre categorization and pitch memorization for blind and visually impaired children and teenagers is discussed. Subjects were divided into three groups: of those with no experience of music, with small musical experience and with substantial musical experience. The blind and visually impaired subjects were investigated, while sighted persons formed reference groups. To date no study has described impact of musical experience on results of such experiments for blind and visually impaired children and teenagers. Our results suggest that blind persons with musical experience may be more sensitive to frequency differences and differences in timbre between two signals as well as may have better short-term auditory memory than blind people with no musical experience. Musical experience of visually impaired persons does not necessary lead to better performance in all conducted auditory tasks.

1. Acheson D.J., Macdonald M.C. (2009), Verbal working memory and language production: common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information, Psychological Bulletin, 135, 1, 50–68.

2. Bogusz E., Koprowska H., Skrodzka E. (2012a), Investigation of performance in selected psychoacoustic tasks by visually impaired children and teenagers, Acta Physica Polonica A, 121, 1A, 13–18.

3. Bogusz E., Koprowska H., Skrodzka E. (2012b), Performance in a pitch memory task by visually handicapped children and youths, Archives of Acoustics, 37, 4, 549–553.

4. Bogusz E., Mrozik G., Skrodzka E. (2012c), Investigation of Vibratory Perception Thresholds in Blind and Visually Handicapped People in Chosen Areas of the Palm and the Wrist, Acta Physica Polonica A, 121, 1A, A13–A18.

5. Bogusz-Witczak E., Skrodzka E., Furmann A., Hojan E., Przybek K. (2015), Results of Auditory Training for Blind and Visually Handicapped Children and Adolescents, Acta Physica Polonica A, 127, 1, 117–119.

6. Bujacz M., Skulimowski P., Strumillo P. (2012), Naviton – A Prototype Mobility Aid for Auditory Presentation of Three-Dimensional Scenes to the Visually Impaired, Journal of Audio Engineering Society, 60, 9, 696–708.

7. Chan A.S., Ho Y., Cheung M. (1998), Music training improves verbal memory, Nature, 396, 128.

8. Crummer G.C., Walton J.P., Wayman J.W., Hantz E.C., Frisina R.D. (1994), Neural processing of musical timbre by musicians, nonmusicians and musicians possessing absolute pitch, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 5, 2720–2727.

9. Elbert T., Sterr A., Rockstroh B., Pantey C., Muller M.M., Taub E. (2002), Expansion of the tonotopic area in the auditory cortex of the blind, Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9941–9944.

10. Franklin M.S., Moore K.S., Yip C., Jonides J., Rattray K., Moher J. (2008), The effects of musical training on verbal memory, Psychology of Music, 36, 353–365.

11. Furmann A., Skrodzka E., Giżewski P., Nowotny Ł. (2013), Effect of sound reproduction method on performance in sound source localization tasks by visually impaired and normal sighted subjects, Acta Physica Polonica A, 123, 6, 988–994.

12. Gaab N., Gaser C., Zaehle T., Jancke L., Schlaug G. (2003), Functional anatomy of pitch memory – An fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling, Neuroimage, 19, 1417–1426.

13. Gougoux F., Lepore F., Lassonde M., Voss P., Zatorre R.J., Belin P. (2004), Pitch discrimination in the early blind, Nature, 430, 309–1309.

14. Gougoux F., Zatorre R.J., Lassonde M., Voss P., Lepore F. (2005), A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Sound Localization: Visual Cortex Activity Predicts Performance in Early-Blind Individuals, PLoS Biol., 3, 2, 324–333.

15. Ho Y., Cheung M., Chan A. (2003), Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: Cross sectional and longitudinal explorations in children, Neuropsychology, 17, 3, 439–450.

16. Hojan E., Jakubowski M., Talukder A., Wereda H., Furmann A., Ewertowski R., Skrodzka E., Perz P., Pękala P., Bogusz E., Lubawy H., Tomaszewski F., Czechyra B., Orczyk M., Szymánski G., Niewiarowicz M., Hojan-Jezierska D., Jezierska A. (2012), A new method of teaching spatial orientation to the blind, Acta Physica Polonica A, 121, 1A, A5–A8.

17. Huntsinger C., Jose P. (1991), A test of Gardner’s Modularity Theory: a Comparison of Short-term Memory for Digits and Tones, Psychomusicology, 10, 3–18.

18. Kishon-Rabin L., Amir O., Vexler Y., Zaltz Y. (2001), Pitch discrimination: are professional musicians better than non-musicians?, Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacogy, 12, 125–143.

19. Micheyl Ch., Delhommeau K., Perrot X., Oxenham A.J. (2006), Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination, Hearing Research, 219, 36–47.

20. Moore B.C.J. (1999), An introduction to the Psychology of Hearing [in Polish], PWN, Poznań.

21. Moore R.E., Keaton K., Watts C. (2007), The role of pitch memory in pitch discrimination and pitch matching, Journal of Voice, 21, 5, 560–567.

22. Ozimek E. (2002), Sound and perceptron [in Polish], PWN, Warszawa-Poznań.

23. Pitt M.A. (1994), Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 5, 976–986.

24. Posedel J., Emery L., Souza B., Fountain C. (2012), Pitch perception, Working Memory, and Second Language Phonological Production, Psychology of Music, 40, 508–517.

25. Rakowski A. (2009), The domain of pitch in music, Archives of Acoustics, 34, 4, 429–443.

26. Rakowski A., Rogowski P. (2007), Experiments on long-term and short-term memory for pitch in musicians, Archives of Acoustics, 32, 4, 815–826.

27. Roth P., Petrucci L., Assimacopoulos A., Pun T. (2000), Concentration Game: an Audio Adaptation for the Blind, Proceeding of CSUN 2000, Los Angeles, USA.

28. Schellenberg E.G., Peretz I. (2008), Music, language and cognition: Unresolved issues, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 2, 45–46.

29. Seither-Preisler A., Johnson L., Krumbholz K., Nobbe A., Patterson R., Seither S., Lütkenhöner B. (2007), Tone Sequences With Conflicting Fundamental Pitch and Timbre Changes are Heard Differently by Musicians and Nonmusicians, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 3, 743–751.

30. Skrodzka E., Furmann A., Bogusz-Witczak E., Hojan E. (2015), Comparison of effects of auditory and music training of blind or visually impaired young people on performance in selected auditory tasks, Acta Physica Polonica A – accepted.

31. Skrodzka E., Maciągowski M., Furmann A. (2014), The Concept of the Auditory Trainining for Blind and Visually Impaired Children and Teenagers, Acta Physica Polonica A, 125, 4A, A31–A37.

32. Spiegel M.F., Watson C.S. (1984), Performance on frequency-discrimination tasks by musicians and nonmusicians, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1690–1695.

33. Tervaniemi M., Just V., Koelsch S., Widmann A., Schröger E. (2005), Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study, Experimental Brain Research, 161, 1–10.

34. Tierney A.T., Bergeson T.R., Pisoni D.B. (2008), Effects of Early Musical Experience on Auditory Sequence Memory, Empirical Musicology Review, 3, 4, 178–186.

35. Wan C.Y., Wood A.G., Reutens D.C., Wilson S.J. (2010), Early but not late-blindness leads to enhanced auditory perception, Neuropsychologia, 48, 344–348.

36. Wersényi G. (2012), Virtual Localization by Blind Persons, Journal of Audio Engineering Society, 60, 7/8, 568–579.

37. Wersényi G., Répás J. (2014), Performance Evaluation of Blind Persons in Listening Tests in Different Environmental Conditions, Proceeding of ICAD 2014, New York, USA.

Archives of Acoustics

The Journal of Institute of Fundamental Technological of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.816
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.835

CiteScore 2016: 1.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.432
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.948

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 84 84 10
PDF Downloads 29 29 2