Ultrasonic Mammography with Circular Transducer Array

Open access


Ultrasonic projection imaging is similar to X-ray radiography. Nowadays, ultrasonic projection methods have been developed in the set-up of multi-element flat arrays with miniature transducers, where one of the array acts as a transmitter and the other one is a receiver.

In the paper, a new method of the projection imaging using a 1024-element circular ultrasonic transducer array is presented. It allows the choice of a projection scanning plane for any angle around a studied object submerged in water. Fast acquisition of measurement data is achieved as a result of parallel switching of opposite transmitting and receiving transducers in the circular array and vertical movement of the array. The algorithm equalizing the length of measurement rays and the distances between them was elaborated for the reconstruction of projection images.

Projection research results of breast phantom obtained by means of the elaborated measurement set-up and compared with mammography simulations (acquired through overlapping of X-ray tomographic images) show that ultrasonic projection method presented in this paper (so-called ultrasonic mammogra-phy) can be applied to the woman's breast and be used as a diagnosis for an early detection of cancerous lesions. It can, most of all, be used as an alternative or complementary method to standard mammography, which is harmful because of ionizing radiation and invasive due to the mechanical compression of tissue.

[1] BRETTEL H., ROEDER U., SCHERG C. (1981), Ultrasonic transmission camera for medical diagnosis, Biomedizinische Technik, 26, p.63.

[2] CHIAO R.Y., THOMAS L.J. (1996), Aperture formation on reduced-channel arrays using the transmit-receive apodization matrix, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 1567-1571.

[3] DRINKWATER B.W., WILCOX P.D. (2006), Ultra sonic arrays for non destructive evaluation: A Review, NDT & E International, 39, 525-541.

[4] DUCK F.A. (1990), Physical Properties of Tissue A Comprehensive Reference Book, Academic Press, London, Chap. 4, 73-135.

[5] DURIC N., LITTRUP P., POULO L., BABKIN A., PEVZNER R., HOLSAPPLE E., RAMA O., GLIDE C. (2007), Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: First results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype, Medical Physics, 34, 2, 773-785.

[6] EAMES M.D.C., HOSSACK J.A. (2008), Fabrication and evaluation of fully-sampled, twodimensional transducer array for “Sonic Window” imaging system, Ultrasonics, 48, 376-383.

[7] ERMERT H., KEITMANN O., OPPELT R., GRANZ B., PESAVENTO A., VESTER M., TILLIG B., SANDER V. (2000), A New Concept For A Real-Time Ultrasound Transmission Camera, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, San Juan, 1611-1614.

[8] GRANZ B., OPPELT R. (1987), A Two Dimensional PVDF Transducer Matrix as a Receiver in an Ultrasonic Transmission Camera, Acoustical Imaging, 15, Plenum Press, New York, 213-225.

[9] GREEN P.S., SCHAEFER L.F., JONES E.D., SUAREZ J.R. (1974), A New High Performance Ultrasonic Camera, AcousticalHolography, 5, Plenum Press, New York, 493-503.

[10] GUDRA T., OPIELINSKI K.J. (2006), The ultmsonic probe for the investigating of internal object structure by ultrasoundtransmission tomography, Ultrasonics, 44, e679-e683.

[11] HOCTOR R.T., KASSAM S.A. (1990), The Unifying Role of the Coarray in Aperture Synthesis for Coherent and Incoherent Imaging, Proceedings of the IEEE, 78, 4, 735-752.

[12] JOHNSON J.A., KARAMAN M., KHURI-YAKUB B.T. (2005), Coherent-Array Imaging Using Phased Subarrays. Part I: Basic Principles, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, I, 37-50.

[13] KAK A.C., SLANEY M. (1988), Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, New York, Chap. 3, 49-111.

[14] KARAMAN M., WAGANT I.O., ORALKAN ö., KHURI YAKUB B.T. (2009), Minimally Redundant 2-D Array Design for 3D Medical Ultrasound Imaging, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 28, 7, 1051, 1061.

[15] KIM JJ., SONG TK. (2006), Real Time High Resolution 3D Imaging Method Using 2D Phased Arrays Based on Sparse SyntheticFocusing Technique, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 1995-1998.

[16] LANDINI L., SARNELLI R., SQUARTINI F. (1985), Frequency Dependent Attenuation in Brest Tissue Characterization, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, II, 4, 599-603.

[17] OPIELINSKI K.J. (2011), Application of transmission waves for characterization and imaging of biological media structures [in Polish], Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wroclawskiej, Wroclaw.

[18] OPIELINSKI K.J. (2012), Ultrasonic Projection, Chap.1 in Ultrasonic Waves, A. Dos Santos Junior [Ed.], InTech, Rijeka, 29-58.

[19] OPIELINSKI K.J., GUDRA T. (2004), Three-dimensional reconstruction of biological objects' internal structure heterogeneity from the set of ultrasonic tomograms, Ultrasonics, 42, 1-9, 705-711.

[20] OPIELINSKI K.J., GUDRA T. (2005), Computer Recognition of Biological Objects' Internal Structure Using Ultrasonic Projection, [in:] Computer Recognition Systems, M. KurzyŃski, E. Puchala, M. WoŹniak, A. Żolnierek [Eds.], Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 645-652.

[21] OPIELINSKI K.J., GUDRA T. (2010), Multielement ultrasonic probes for projection imaging of biological media, Physics Procedia, 3, 1, 635-642.

[22] OPIELINSKI K.J., GUDRA T. (2013), Ultrasonic projection imaging of biological media, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics, 19, Acoustical Society of America, 075008.

[23] OPIELIŃSKI K.J., GUDRA T., PRUCHNICKI P. (2010a), A Digitally Controlled Model of an Active Ultrasonic Transducer Matrix for Projection Imaging of Biological Media, Archives of Acoustics, 35, 1, 75-90.

[24] OPIELIŃSKI K.J., GUDRA T., PRUCHNICKI P. (2010b), Narrow Beam Ultrasonic Transducer Matrix Model for Projection Imaging of Biological Media, Archives of Acoustics, 35, 1, 91-109.

[25] OPIELIŃSKI K.J., GUDRA T., PRUCHNICKI P., PODGÓRSKI P., KRAÓANICKI T., KURCZ J., SĄSIA DEK M. (2013), Ultrasound Transmission Tomography Imaging of Structure of Breast Elastography Phantom, Compared to US, CT and MRI, Archives of Acoustics, 38, 3, 321-334.

[26] OPIELINSKI K.J., PRUCHNICKI P., GUDRA T. (2011), 2D Directional Ultrasonic Passive Matrix of 512 Elementary Transducers for Projection Imaging of Biological Media, [in:] International Congress on Ultrasonics Gdansk 2011 AIP Conference Proceedings, B.B.J. Linde, J. Pączkowski, N. Ponikwicki [Eds.], American Institute of Physics, New York, 1433, 199-202.

[27] REGUIEG D., PADILLA F., DEFONTAINE M., PATAT F., LAUGIER P. (2006), Ultrasonic Transmission Device Based on Crossed Beam Forming, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, Vancouver, 2108-2111.

[28] WANG A.S., PELC N.J. (2011), Synthetic CT: Simulating low dose single and dual energy protocols from a dual energy scan, Medical Physics, 38, 10, 5551-5562.

[29] WILDES D.G., CHIAO R.Y., DAFT Ch.M.W., RIGBY K.W., SMITH L.S., THOMENIUS K.E. (1997), Elevation performance of 1.25D and 1.5D Transducer Arrays, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferro electrics, and Frequency Control, 44, 5, 1027-1037.

[30] WóJCIK J. (2004), Nonlinear reflection and transmission of plane acoustic waves, Archives of Acoustics, 29, 4, 607-632.

[31] WYGANT I.O., LEE H., NIKOZADEH A., YEH D.T., ORALKAN Ö., KARAMAN M., KHURI-YAKUB B.T. (2006), An Integrated Circuit with Transmit Beam forming and Parallel Receive Channels for Real Time Three Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 2186-2189.

[32] YANG J.N., MURPHY A.D., MADSEN E.L., ZAGZEBSKI J.A., GILCHRIST K.W., FRANK G.R., MCDONALD M.C., MILLARD C.A., FARAGGI A., JARAMILLO C.A., GOSSET F.R. (1991), A Method for in Vitro Mapping of Ultrasonic Speed and Density in Breast Tissue, Ultrasonic Imaging, 13, 91-109.

Archives of Acoustics

The Journal of Institute of Fundamental Technological of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.816
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.835

CiteScore 2016: 1.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.432
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.948


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 89 89 9
PDF Downloads 24 24 2