Body composition and physical performance of Slovak Ice hockey players with different training approach during pre-season preparation

Open access


The pre-season preparation aim is to improve the components of physical performance through the changes in training intensity, gradual increment in volume, variation in training frequency and optimizing the body composition. The problem in team sports is the lack of individualization, because most coaches in team sports focus their training on the group and not on improving each player’s strengths and weaknesses. The aim of this study is to identify differences in the body composition and physical performance of young ice-hockey players (15-18 years) with different pre-season training approaches (collective vs. individual). This longitudinal study monitored 13 ice-hockey players with collective training and 8 ice-hockey players with individual training during their pre-season preparation. Body composition was measured by bioimpedance analyzer BIA 101 (Akern, S.R.L.) and the Myotest PRO determined player physical performance in power, force and velocity. Performance and body composition comparisons showed gradual increase in the differences between the two studied groups during the training process. This increase escalated to significant differences in the final output test results and was especially noted in the upper limbs power and force (p=0.016; p<0.001) and lower limbs power and force (p=0.029; p=0.001) with better performance results by individual training approach. Stepwise linear regression also showed significant relationship between upper limbs power, resistance (p<0.001) and fat mass (p<0.001). The upper limbs force was significantly associated with intra-cellular (p<0.001) and extra-cellular water (p=0.026), body cell mass index (p<0.001), basal metabolic rate (p<0.001) and training approach (p<0.001), while the lower limbs power was significantly associated with total body water (p<0.001), training approach (p=0.033) and the pre-season preparation phase (p<0.001). In addition, the training approach (p<0.001), preparation phase (p<0.001), player position (p=0.012) and fat free mass (p<0.001) were significantly associated with lowers limb force. Our results indicate the importance of using an individual training approach and optimal body composition in physical performance progression.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Andreoli A Marfe G Manzi V Sinibaldi-Salimei P. 2012. Is body cell mass a predictive index of performance in male recreational long-distance runners? Sport Sci Health 8:47-50.

  • Bogdanis GC Nevill ME Boobis LH Lakomy HK.. 1996. Contribution of phosphocreatine and aerobic metabolism to energy supply during repeated sprint exercise. J Appl Physiol 3:876-84.

  • Bompa TO. 1994. Theory and methodology of training: the key to athletic performance. Kendall: Hunt.

  • Burr JF Jamnik RK Baker J Macpherson A Gledhill N Mcguire EJ. 2008. Relationship of physical fitness test results and hockey playing potential in elite-level ice hockey players. J Strength Cond Res 22:1535-43.

  • Comstock BA Solomon-Hill G Flanagan SD Earp SD Luk HY Dobbins KA et al. 2011. Validity of the Myotest® in measuring force and power production in the squat and bench press. J Strenght Cond Res 25(8):2293-97.

  • Cox MH Miles DS Verde TJ Rhodes EC. 1995. Applied physiology of ice hockey. Sports Med 19:174-201.

  • De Lorenzo A Andreoli A Serrano P D’Orazio N Cervelli V Volpe SL. 2003. Body cell mass measured by total body potassium in normal weight and obese men and women. J Am Coll Nutr 22(6):546-49.

  • Dey SK Bandyopadhyay A Jana S Chatter-jee S. 2015. Assessment of body cell mass in Indian junior elite players (male) of different sports using bioelectrical impedance analysis method. MedicinaSportiva 11(2):2633-40.

  • Dovalil J. 2002. Výkon a tréningvesportu. Praha: Olympia pp 332.

  • Farlinger CM Kruisselbrink DL Fowles JR. 2007. Relationships of skating performance in competitive hockey players. J Strength Cond Res 21:915-22.

  • Grasgruber P Cacek J. 2008. Sportovní geny. Brno: Computer Press pp 480.

  • Janot JM Beltz NM Dalleck LD. 2015. Multiple off-ice performance variables predict on-ice skating performance in male and female division III ice hockey players. J Sports Sci Med 14:522-9.

  • Knussmann R. 1988. Somatometrie. In: R Knussmann editor. Handbuch der vergleichenden biologie des menschen Band I Teil 1. Stuttgart: Fischer G; pp 232-85.

  • Kramer WP Volek JS Clark KL Gordon SE Puhl SM Koziris LP et al. 1999. Influence of exercise training on physiological and performance changes with weight loss in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(9):1320-29.

  • Kraemer W. 2010. Construct validity of the Myotest® in measuring force and power production. J Strenght Cond Res 24: 1.

  • Kumar S Dutt A Hemraj S Bhat S Manipadybhima B. 2012. Phase Angle Measurement in Healthy Human Subjects through Bio-Impedance Analysis Iran. J Basic Med Sci 15:1180-84.

  • Kyle UG Bosaeus I De Lorenzo AD Deurenberg P Elia M Gómez JM et al. 2004. Bio-electrical impedance analysis – part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 23(5):1226-43.

  • Melchiorri G Monteleone G Andreoli A Cella C Sgroi M De Lorenzo A. 2007. Body cell mass measured by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy in professional football (soccer) players. J Sport Med Phys Fitness 47(4):408-12.

  • Montgomery DL. 1988. Physiology of ice hockey. Sport Med 5: 99-126.

  • Morgans R Orme P Anderson L Drust B. 2014. Principles and practices of training for soccer. J Sport Health Sci 3:251-257.

  • Ribeiro AS Avelar A Schoenfeld BJ Ritti Dias RM Altimari LR Cyrino ES. 2014. Resistance training promotes increase in intracellular hydration in men and women. Eur J Sport Sci 6:578-85.

  • Roczniok R Stanula A Maszczyk A Mostowik A Kowalczyk M Fidos-Czuba O Zajac A. 2016. Physiological Physical and on-ice performance criteria for selection of elite ice hockey teams. Biol Sport 33(1):43-48.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.55

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.22
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.472

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 187 187 19
PDF Downloads 173 173 24