Estimating age at death from an archaeological bone sample – a preliminary study based on comparison of histomorphometric methods

Barbara Mnich 1 , Janusz Skrzat 2 ,  and Krzysztof Szostek 1
  • 1 Department of Anthropology, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian Univeristy in Kraków, Poland
  • 2 Department of Anatomy, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian Univeristy in Kraków, Poland


The estimation of age at death is one of the most fundamental biological parameters, determined on skeletal remains in anthropological context. That is why, there is a constant need to improve applied methods. Histomorphometry, which uses microscopic analysis of bone tissue is suggested to be one alternative method. In general, this technique is based on measurements and the determination of the number and density of basic bone structural units, osteons. Osteon density is found to be related with age of the individual. The main goal of this research was to compare results of determined age at death, on the basis of ribs histology, comes from methods proposed by different authors. We analyzed ground cross sections of ribs from archeological origin. The presented methodology is simple in use and effective. Four different methods were tested (Stout and Paine 1992; Cho et al. 2002; Kim et al. 2007; Bednarek et al. 2009). The obtained age results were compared with each other as well as related to the age estimated by standard macroscopic method used in anthropology. Bednarek’s method is recognized to be the most supportive for anthropological analyzes. Methodological issues connected with grinding methodology and results interpretation are also presented. Hypothesis about interpopulation as well as histological and dimorphic differences were confirmed.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Absolonova K, Veleminsky P, Dobisikova M, Beran M, Zocova J. 2012. Histological Estimation of age at death from the compact bone of burned and unburned human ribs. J Forensic Sci 58(S1):35-4.

  • Bednarek J, Bloch-Bogusławska E, Engelgardt P, Wolska E, Śliwka K. 2009. Validity of histomorphometric rib assessment for age at death prediction. Problems of Forensic Sciences LXXX:403-10.

  • Buikstra J, Ubelaker DH. 1994. Standard for data collection for human skeletal re Archaeological Survey Research. 44.

  • Cannet C, Baraybar JP, Kolopp M, Meyer P, Ludes B. 2011. Histomorphometric estimation of age in paraffin-embedded ribs: a feasibility study. Int J Legal Med 125:493-502.

  • Cho H, Stout S, Madsen RW, Streeter M. 2002. Population specific histological age estimating method: a model for known African-American and European-American skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 47(1):12-18.

  • Crowder Ch, Rosella L. 2007. Assessment of Intra- and Intercostal Variation in Rib Histomorphometry: Its Impact on Evidentiary Examination. J Forensic Sci 52(2):271-6.

  • Ericksen MF. 1991. Histologic estimation of age at death using the anterior cortex of the femur. Am J Phys Anthropol 84:171-9.

  • Frost HM. 1987. Secondary osteon populations: An algorithm for determining mean bone tissue age. Yearb Phys Anthropol 30:221-38.

  • Kereley ER. 1965. The microscopic determination of age in human bone. Am J Phys Anthrop 23:149-64.

  • Kim Y-S, Kim D-I, Park D-K, Lee J-H, Chung N-E, Lee W-T, Han S-H. 2007. Assessment of histomorphological features of the sternal end of the fourth rib for age estimation in Koreans. J Forensic Sci 52(6):1237-42.

  • Malinowski A, Strzałko J. 1985. Antropologia. Warszawa-Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

  • Maat GJR, Van Den Bos RPM, Aarents MJ. 2001. Manual preparation of ground sections for the microscopy of natural bone tissue: Update and modification of Frost’s “Rapid manual method”. Int J Osteoarchaeol 11:366-74.

  • Pfeiffer S. 1998. Variability in osteon size in recent human population. Am J Phys Anthropol 106:219-27.

  • Piontek J. 1985. Biologia populacji pradziejowych. Zarys metodyczny. Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza.

  • Reichs KJ. 1998. Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human, Second Edition. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD.

  • Samson C, Branigan C. 1987. A new method of estimating age at death from fragmentary and weathered bone. In: A Boddington, AN Garland and Janaway RC (editors). Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. 101-8.

  • Singh U, Gunberg DL. 1970. Estimation of age at death in human males from quantitative histology of bone fragments. Am J Phys Anthrop 33:373-82.

  • Stout SD, Paine RR. 1992. Brief communication: Histolological age estimation using rib and clavicle. Am J Phys Anthropol 87:111-5.

  • Stout S.D., Porro M.A., Perotti B., 1996. Brief Communication: A test and correction of the clavicle method of Stout and Paine for histological age estimation of skeletal remains. Am J Phys Anthropol 100:139-42.

  • Stout SD. 1998. The application of histological techniques for age at death determination. In: Reichs KJ (editor). Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human. 2nd edition. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD.

  • Streeter M. 2010. A four-stage method of age at death estimation for use in the subadult rib cortex. J Forensic Sci 55(4):1019-24.

  • Thompson DD, Guiness-Hey M. 1981. Bone mineral-osteon analysis of Yupik-Inupiaq skeletons. Am J Phys Anthropol 55:1-7.

  • Wu K, Schubeck KE, Frost HM, Villanueva A. 1970. Haversian bone formation rates determined by a new method in a mastodon, and in human diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res 6:204-19.


Journal + Issues