Variability of Mercury Content in Coal Matter From Coal Seams of The Upper Silesia Coal Basin

Open access


The process of identifying and documenting the quality parameters of coal, as well as the conditions of coal deposition in the seam, is multi-stage and extremely expensive. The taking and analyzing of seam samples is the method of assessment of the quality and quantity parameters of coals in deep mines. Depending on the method of sampling, it offers quite precise assessment of the quality parameters of potential commercial coals. The main kind of seam samples under consideration are so-called “documentary seam samples”, which exclude dirt bands and other seam contaminants. Mercury content in coal matter from the currently accessible and exploited coal seams of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) was assessed. It was noted that the mercury content in coal seams decreases with the age of the seam and, to a lesser extent, seam deposition depth. Maps of the variation of mercury content in selected lithostratigraphic units (layers) of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin have been created.

BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2014.

Das T.B., Pal S.K., Gouricharan T., Sharma K.K., Choudhury A., 2013. Evaluation of Reduction Potential of Selected Heavy Metals from and Indian Coal by Conventional Coal Cleaning. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 33, 300-312.

Adams D.M.B., Carpenter A.M., Clarke L.B., Davidson R.M., Fernando R., Fukasawa K., Scott D.H., Smith I.M., Sloss L., Sound H.N., Takeshita M., Wu Z., 2006. SOx - emissions and Control. IEA Clean Coal Centre.

Demir I., Ruch R.E., Damberger H.H., Harvey R.D., Steele J.D., Ho K.K., 1998. Environmentally critical elements in channel and cleaned samples of Illinois coals. Fuel, 77, 1/2, 95-107.

Dziok T., Strugała A., Rozwadowski A. Górecki J., Ziomber S., 2014. Zmiany zawartości rtęci w węglu kamiennym w procesie jego wzbogacania. Polityka Energetyczna, 17, 4, 277-288, (in Polish).

Economic Commission for Europe, 1998. Committee on Sustainable Energy. Interantional Classfication of in-Seam Coals. United Nations, New York and Geneva.

Huggins F.E., Seidu L.B.A., Shah N., Huffman G.P., Honaker R.Q., Kyger J.R., Higgins B.L., 2009. Elemental modes of occurrence in an Illinois #6 coal and fractions prepared by physical separation techniques at a coal preparation plant. International Journal of Coal Geology, 78, 65-76. (in Polish).

IEA Statistics, 2014a. Electricity Information. IEA/OECD.

IEA Statistics, 2014b. Energy Balances of OECD Countries. 2014 Edition.

Jureczka J., Krieger W., Wilk S., 2009. Zasoby perspektywiczne węgla kamiennego w Górnośląskim Zagłębiu Węglowym. XIX Konferencja z cyklu „Aktualia i perspektywy gospodarki surowcami mineralnymi”, 4-6.11.2009, PAN Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią, Kraków, (In Polish with Englisch abstrakt.)

Mastalerz M., Drobniak A., 2005. Vertical variations of mercury in Pennsylvanian coal beds from Indiana. International Journal of Coal Geology, 63, 36-57.

Mercury Study Report to Congress, 1997. Volume V: Health Effects of Mercury and Mercury Compounds, EPA-452/R-97-007.

Ozbayoglu G., 2011. Partitioning of major and trace elements of a Turkish lignite with size and density. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 4, 51-60.

Ozbayoglu G., 2013. Removal of hazardous air pollutants based on commercial coal preparation data. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 49 (2), 621-629.

Pavlish J.H., Sondreal E.A., Mann M.D., Olson E.S., Galbreath K.C., Laundal D.L., Benson S.A., 2003. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology, 82, 89-165.

PN-82/G-97002, 1982. Węgiel kamienny - Typy. The Polish Committee for Standardization (in Polish).

PN-G-04502:2014-11, 2014. Węgiel kamienny i brunatny - Pobieranie i przygotowanie próbek do badań laboratoryjnych - Metody podstawowe. The Polish Committee for Standardization (in Polish).

PN-ISO 1171:2002, 2002. Paliwa stałe - Oznaczanie popiołu. The Polish Committee for Standardization (in Polish).

Pyka I., Wierzchowski K., 2010. Technological Conditions of Mercury Content Reduction in Hard Coal Based on the ROM Coal from Several Polish Collieries. Arch. Min. Sci., 55, 2, 349-371.

Pyka I., Wierzchowski K., 2015. Możliwości oceny zanieczyszczenia handlowego węgla kamiennego rtęcią na podstawie analiz próbek pokładowych. Przegląd Górniczy, 6, 50-56, (in Polish).

Quick W.J., Ironson R.M.A., 2002. Trace elements partitioning during the firing of washed and untreated power stations coals, Fuel, 81, 665-657.

SC-1.PB.23, 2012. Oznaczanie zawartości Hg metodą absorpcyjnej spektrometrii atomowej z generowaniem zimnych par (CVAAS). Procedura GIG, (in Polish).

Sloss L.L., 2012. Legislation, standards and methods for mercury emissions control. CCC/195. London, UK, IEA Clean Coal Centre, 43.

Swaine D.J., 2000. Why trace elements are important. Fuel Processing Technology, 65-66, 21-33.

Toole-O’Neil B., Tewalt S.J., Finkelman R.B., Akers D.J., 1999. Mercury concentration in coal - unraveling the puzzle. Fuel, 78, 47-54.

UNEP, 2010. Process Optimization Guidance for Reducing Mercury Emissions from Coal Combustion in Power Plants. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE) Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland.

UNEP, 2013. Global Mercury Assessment 2013, Sources, Emissions, Releases and Environmental Transport. UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland.

Wang W.F., Qin Y., Wang J., Li J., 2009. Partitioning of hazardous trace elements during coal preparation. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 1, 838-844.

Wang W.F., Qin Y, Sang S., Jiang B., Guo Y., Zhu Y., Fu X., 2006a. Partitioning of minerals and elements Turing preparation of Taixi coal, China. Fuel, 85, 57-67.

Wang W., Qin Y., Wei C., Li Z., Guo Y., Zhu Y, 2006b. Partitioning of elements and macerals during preparation of Antaibao coal. International Journal of Coal Geology, 68, 223-232.

Archives of Mining Sciences

The Journal of Committee of Mining of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.550
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.610

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.320
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.950


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 94 12
PDF Downloads 30 30 5