Long-Term Planning for Open Pits for Mining Sulphide-Oxide Ores in Order to Achieve Maximum Profit

Open access


Profitable exploitation of mineralised material from the earth’s crust is a complex and difficult task that depends on a comprehensive planning process. Answering the question of how to plan production depends on the geometry of the deposit, as well as the concentration, distribution, and type of minerals in it. The complex nature of mineral deposits largely determines the method of exploitation and profitability of mining operations. In addition to unit operating costs and metal prices, the optimal recovery of and achievement of maximum profit from deposits of sulphide-oxide ores also depend, to a significant extent, on the level of technological recovery achieved in the ore processing procedure. Therefore, in defining a long-term development strategy for open pits, special attention must be paid to the selection of an optimal procedure for ore processing in order to achieve the main objective: maximising the Net Present Value (NPV). The effect of using two different processes, flotation processing and hydrometallurgical methods (bioleaching acid leaching), on determining the ultimate pit is shown in the case of the Kraku Bugaresku-Cementacija sulphide-oxide ore deposit in eastern Serbia. Analysis shows that the application of hydrometallurgical methods of processing sulphide-oxide ore achieved an increase in NPV of 20.42%.


  • Angelov T., Savov G., Tsekov A., Nishkov I., 2015. The successful commercial implementation of the combined leach-ion exchange-solvent extraction-electrowinning process at the Bucim copper project, Proceedings of Alta, Nickel-Cobalt-Copper session, 25-27 May, Perth, Australia, pp. 1-8.

  • Armstrong D., 1990. Planning and design of surface mines. B. A. Kennedy (Ed.), Surface Mining (second ed.). Littleton, Colorado, USA: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration Inc., pp. 459-475.

  • Caccetta L., 2007. Application of optimisation techniques in open pit mining, Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources, Volume 99 of the series International Series in Operations Research amp; Mana pp. 547-559.

  • Caccetta L., Hill S.P., 2003. An Application of Branch and Cut to Open Pit Mine Scheduling. Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 27, pp. 349-365.

  • Conić V., 2015. Biotechnology for treatment of complex sulphide concentrate. Doctoral dissertation, (in Serbian), University of Belgrade - Technical Faculty in Bor.

  • Cvetkovski V., Conić V., Vuković M., Stojanovski G., Cvetkovska M., 2009. Construction of Isotherms in the Solvent Copper Extraction. Hemijska industrija 63 (4), pp. 309-312 [in Serbian].

  • David M., 1973. Tools for planning: Variances and conditional simulation. J.R. Sturgul (Ed.) 11th APCOM University of Arizona, pp. D10-D23.

  • David M., Dowd P.A., Korobov S., 1974. Forecasting departure from planning in open pit design and grade control. 12th APCOM Symposium Colorado School of Mines, pp. F131-F153.

  • Davis G., Newman A., 2008. Modern Strategic Mine Planning. http://inside.mines.edu/~gdavis/Papers/CRC_Mining_Conference_Paper.pdf

  • Dimitrakopoulos R., 2006. Conditional simulation algorithms for modelling orebody uncertainty in open pit optimization. Int. J. Min. Reclamation Environ., vol. 12, pp. 173-179.

  • Fan Z.C., Wang J.M., Hao Q.M., 2003. Optimising Open Pit Mine Production Scheduling by Graph Theory, Mine Planning and Equipment Selection. Kalgoorlie, WA, 23-25 April, pp. 447-454, http://www.ausimm.com.au/publications/epublication.aspx?ID=795.

  • Fouillac C., 2006. BioMinE project, Contract No. 500329, BRGM.

  • Gericke M., Conić V., Cvetkovski V., Milanović D., Vuković M., Milanović S., 2008. Bioleaching of the Majdanpek and V. Krivelj concentrates. IOC on Mining and Metallurgy, Sokobanja, pp. 256-262.

  • Gericke M., Muller H.H., Staden P.J., Pinches A., 2008. Development of a tank bioleaching process for the treatment of complex Cu-polymetallic concentrates. Hydrometallurgy, 94, pp. 23-28.

  • Davis G.A., Newman A.M., 2008. Modern Strategic Mine Planning, Colorado School of Mines, http://inside.mines.edu/~gdavis/Papers/CRC_Mining_Conference_Paper.pdf.

  • Johnson T.B., 1969. Optimum production scheduling. Proceedings of 8th APCOM symp., Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 539-562.

  • Journel A., Kyriakidis P.C., 2004. Evaluation of mineral reserves: A simulation approach. Oxford University Press, p. 215.

  • Kržanović D., Kolonja B., Stevanović D., 2015. Maximizing the net present value by applying an optimal cut-off grade for long-term planning of the copper open pits. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, The Union of Metallurgy, Mining Industry and Geology of Slovak Republic, the Slovak Mining Society, the Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies (FBERG) of the Technical University of Kosice (Slovakia), and the Faculty of Mining and Geology (HGF) of the VSB Technical University of Ostrava (Czech Republic), Vol. 20 (2015), nu. 1, pp. 49-61, http://actamont.tuke.sk/ams2015.html.

  • Kržanović D., Rajković R., Mikić M., Ljubojev M., 2014. Effect of stage development of mining operations on maximization of the net present value in long-term planning of open pits. Mining and Metallurgy Engineering Bor, 4/2014, Mining and Metallurgy Institute Bor, DOI:10.5937/MMEB1404033K, pp. 33-40.

  • Lerchs H., Grossmann I.F., 1965. Optimum Design of Open Pit Mines. Transactions, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. LXVIII, pp. 17-24.

  • Nelson S., Rolf F., Pierre P., Alejandro V., Los B., 2008. Development Project. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Surface Mining, pp. 79-92.

  • Ramazan S., Dimitrakopoulos R., 2004a. Recent application of operation research and efficient MIP formulation in open-pit mining. Society for Mining Metallurgy and Exploration. Transactions, 316, pp. 73-78.

  • Ramazan S., Dimitrakopoulos R., 2004b. Traditional and New MIP Models for Production Scheduling with In-Situ Grade Variability. International Journal of Surface Mining, Vol. 18, pp. 85-98.

  • Robertson S., Neale J., Muller H., Gericke M., 2008. Deliverable: DIV8A BioMinE - FP6 Project IP NMP2-CT-2005-500329, report entitled Cu & Cu polymetallics: report on piloting operation and pre-feasibility study for RTB Bor copper concentrates, pp. 1-55.

  • Robertson S.W., Vercuil A., Van Staden P.J, Craven P., 2005. A bacterial heap leaching approach for the treatment of low grade primary copper sulphide ore. The Third Southern African Conference on Base Metals, South Africa, pp. 471-484. Source: Mining and Smelting Complex Bor - Group, 2015.

  • Sturgul J.R., Li Z., 1997. New developments in simulation technology and applications in the minerals industry. Int. J. Mining Reclamation Environ, vol. 11, pp. 159-162.

  • Swart R., Cramer K., Castro O., Tasker P., Forgan R., 2007. Evolution of copper solvent extraction reagents. Hydrocopper, IV International Cooper Hydrometallurgy Workshop, Viña del Mar, Chile, pp. 41-47.

  • Tinkler O., Shiels D., Soderstrom M., 2009. The ACORGA® OPT series: comparative studies against aldoxime: ketoxime reagents. Hydrometallurgy Conference, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 272-282.

  • Tolwinsky, B., Underwood R., 1996. A scheduling algorithm for open pit mines. IMA J. Manage. Math., vol. 7, pp. 247-270.

  • Vučetic J., Vrvić M., Vujović B., 1978. The Use of Tiobacteria Isolated from Tailing Dump and Waste Water in Bor for Leaching the Bor Tailings. Faculty of Mining and Metallurgy and Copper Institute Bor, Proceedings, p. 157 (in Serbian).

  • Watling H.R., 2006. The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides ‒ A review. Hydrometallurgy, 84, pp. 81-108.

  • Whittle J., 1999. A decade of open pit mine planning and optimization ‒ The craft of turning algorithms into packages. Proceedings of the 28th APCOM symposium, Golden, Colorado School of Mines, pp. 15-24. Whittle User’s Guide, 2014. Geovia, Dassault Systèmes.

Archives of Mining Sciences

The Journal of Committee of Mining of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.550
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.610

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.320
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.950


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 16 16 16
PDF Downloads 7 7 7