Research on Liquid Forming Process of Nickel Superalloys Thin Sheet Metals

Open access


The paper presents the study of drawability of thin sheet metals made of a nickel superalloy Inconel type. The manufacturing process of axisymmetric cup – cone and a closed section profile in the form of a circular tube were designed and analyzed. In both cases, working fluid-oil was used in place of the rigid tools. The process of forming liquid is currently the only alternative method for obtaining complex shapes, coatings, and especially if we do it with high-strength materials. In the case of nickel superalloys the search for efficient methods to manufacture of the shaped shell is one of the most considerable problems in aircraft industry [1-5]. However, the automotive industries have the same problem with so-called advanced high-strength steels (AHSS). Due to this, both industrial problems have been examined and the emphasis have been put on the process of liquid forming (hydroforming). The study includes physical tests and the corresponding numerical simulations performed, using the software Eta/Dynaform 5.9. Numerical analysis of the qualitative and quantitative forecasting enables the formability of materials with complex and unusual characteristics of the mechanical properties and forming technology. It has been found that only the computer aided design based on physical and numerical modeling, makes efficient plastic processing possible using a method of hydroforming. Drawability evaluation based on the determination of the mechanical properties of complex characteristics is an indispensable element of this design in the best practice of industrial manufacturing products made of thin sheet metals.

[1] S.A. Asgari, M. Pereira, B.F. Rolfe, M. Dingle, P. D. Hodgson, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 203 (1-3), 129-136 (2008).

[2] M. Hyrcza-Michalska, Sol. St. Phenom. 212, 259-262 (2014).

[3] M. Hyrcza-Michalska, Sol. St. Phenom. 246, 75-78 (2016).

[4] M. Hyrcza-Michalska, Hutnik – Wiadomości Hutnicze 79 (8), 595-599 (2013).

[5] M. Hyrcza-Michalska, Steel Res. Internat. Spec. edit. 2010 Metal Forming Conf. 81 (9), 817-820 (2010).

[6] Q. Huan, J. Mater. Eng. 8, 92-100 (2012).

[7] S. Azadian, L.-Y. Wei, R. Warren, Mater. Charact. 53, 7-16 (2004).

[8] V. Shankar, K.B.S. Rao, S.L. Mannan, J Nucl. Mater. 288, 222-232 (2001).

[9] T. Drenger, J. Wiśniewski, S. Sosnowski, Ł. Nowacki, T. Gądek, Z. Ulatowski, Obróbka Plastyczna Metali 18, 15-22 (2007).

[10] A. Nowotnik, K. Kubiak, Hutnik – Wiadomości Hutnicze 75, 432-434 (2008).

[11] I. Dul, PS 81, 67-70 (2009).

[12] AMS 5599.

[13] AMS 5596.

[14] S. Novotny, P. Hein, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 115, 65-69 (2001).

[15] A. Kocańda, H. Sadłowska, Arch. Civ. Mech.l Eng. 8 (3), 55-72 (2008).

[16] E. Onate, J. Rojek, M. Chiumenti, S.D. Idelsohn, F. Del Pin, R. Aubry, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195, 6750-6777 (2006).

[17] H-S. Jeong, M-Y. Ha, J-R. Cho, J. Prec. Eng. and Manuf. 13 (12), 2143-2148 (2012).

[18] J-T. Yoo, J-H. Yoon, H-S. Lee, S-K. Youn, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26 (7), 2101-2105 (2012).

[19] A.B. Sadat, M.Y. Reddy, Exp. Mech. 8, 282-288 (1992).

[20] A.B. Sadat, M.Y. Reddy, Exp. Mech. 12, 343-348 (1993).

[21] N. Xiang, Z-J. Wang, J. Yi, H. Song, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 12, (2016) (published on-line).

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials

The Journal of Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Commitee on Metallurgy of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.571
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.347
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.740


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 351 259 21
PDF Downloads 141 127 14