Curie Temperature and Microstructural Changes Due to the Heating Treatment of Magnetic Amorphous Materials

Open access

Three distinct alloys: Fe86Zr7Nb1Cu1B5, Fe82Zr7Nb2Cu1B8, and Fe81Pt5Zr7Nb1Cu1B5 were characterized both magnetically and structurally. The samples, obtained with spinning roller method as a ribbons 3 mm in width and 20 μm thick, were investigated as-quenched and after each step of a multi steps heating treatment procedure. Each sample was annealed at four steps, fifteen minutes at every temperature, starting from 573K+600K up to +700K depending on type of alloy. Mössbauer spectroscopy data and transmission electron microscope (HRE M) pictures confirmed that the as-quenched samples are fully amorphous. This is not changed after the first stages of treatment heating leads to a reduction of free volumes. The heating treatment has a great influence on the magnetic susceptibilities. The treatment up to 600K improves soft magnetic properties: an χ increase was observed, from about 400 to almost 1000 for the samples of alloys without Pt, and from about 200 to 450 at maximum, for the Fe81Pt5Zr7Nb1Cu1B5. Further heating, at more elevated temperatures, leads to magnetic hardening of the samples. Curie temperatures, established from the location of Hopkinson’s maxima on the χ(T) curve are in very good agreement with those obtained from the data of specific magnetization, σ(T), measured in a field of 0.75T. As a critical parameter β was chosen to be equal 0.36 for these calculations, it confirmed that the alloys may be considered as ferromagnetic of Heisenberg type. Heating treatment resulted in decreasing of TC. These changes are within a range of several K.

[1] J.M.D. Coey, Amorphous Solid and Liquid State 13, 433-466 (1985).

[2] S. N. Kaul, V. Siruguri, G. Chandra, Phys. Rev. B 45, 12343-12356 (1992).

[3] V.A. Makarov, A.Ya. Belenkii, O.S. Kozlova, Phys. Stat. Sol. (A) 139, 173-179 (1993).

[4] M. Nabiałek, P. Pietrusiewicz, K. Błoch, M. Szota, Int. J. Mater. Res. 106, 682-688 (2015).

[5] P. Pietrusiewicz, M. Nabiałek, M. Szota, M. Dośpiał, K. Błoch, A. Bukowska, K. Gruszka, Arch. Metall. Mater. 59, 659-662 (2014).

[6] K. Gruszka, M. Nabiałek, K. Błoch, J. Olszewski, Nukleonika 60, 23-27 (2015)

[7] P. Pietrusiewicz, K. Błoch, M. Nabiałek, S. Walters, Acta Phys. Pol. A 127, 397-399 (2015).

[8] A. P. Thomas, M.R.J. Gibbs, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 103, 97-110 (1992).

[9] K. Błoch, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 390, 118-122 (2015).

[10] J. Gondro, K. Błoch, M. Nabiałek, K. Waltters, M. Szota, Arch. Metall. Mater. 60, 1071-1074 (2015).

[11] M. Al.-Haj, J. Barry, J. Mat. Sci. Lett. 17 (1998) 1125‑1127.

[12] R.A. Brand, Nucl Instrum Meth B 28, 398-416 (1987).

[13] G. H`ohne, W. Hemminger, H.J. Flammersheim, second edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2003).

[14] J. Gondro, J. Świerczek, J. Rzcki, W. Ciurzyriska, J. Olszewski, J, Zbroszczyk, K. Bloch, M. Osyra A. Łukiewska, J.Magn. Magn. Mater. 341, 100-107 (2013).

[15] J. Zbroszczyk, L. K. Varga, J. Olszewski, W. H. Ciurzyńska, J. Phys. IV 8, 203-206 (1998).

[16] J. Gondro, J. Świerczek, K. Błoch, J. Zbroszczyk, W. Ciurzyńska, J. Olszewski, Physica B 445, 37-41 (2014).

[17] H.W. Kwon, S. W. Shon, J. Magn. 6, 61-65 (2001).

[18] R. Meyer, H. Kronmüller, Phys. Stat. Sol. B 109, 693-703 (1982).

[19] S.N. Kaul, Phys. Rew. B 22, 278-287 (1980).

[20] S.N. Kaul, J.Magn. Magn. Mater. 53, 5-53 (1985).

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials

The Journal of Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Commitee on Metallurgy of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.571
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.347
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.740

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 183 126 6
PDF Downloads 75 61 5