The Tin Coatings Utilisation As Blood Contact Surface Modification In Implantable Rotary Left Ventricle Assist Device Religaheart Rot

Open access

Abstract

Constructions of the mechanical-bearingless centrifugal blood pumps utilize different types of non-contact physical bearings, which allows to balance the forces that have an impact on the pump impeller, stabilizing its position in the pump house without wall contact. The paper presents investigations of the hybrid (passive magnetic bearings and hydrodynamic bearings) suspension system for the centrifugal blood pump. Numerical simulations were used to evaluate the hydrodynamic bearing lifting force and magnetic bearing forces interaction. An important aspect of rotor suspension system design was the nominal gap in hydrodynamic bearing area in order to reduce the blood damage risk in this region. The analyses results confirmed that for a small diameter centrifugal pump, the nominal operating hydrodynamic bearing gap could be established within the range from 0.033 to 0.072 mm.

[1] V.L. Roger, et al. Circulation. e2-294, 131 (2015).

[2] C. Garrick, et al. Circulation. 125, 1304 (2012).

[3] J. K. Kirklin, et al, Sixth INTERMACS annual report: A 10,000 patient database; JHLT. 6, 133 (2014).

[4] K. Borque, Implantable blood pump, U.S. Patent; US 2012/0046514, 2011.

[5] J.C. Woodard, et al., Rotary pump with hydro-dynamically suspended impeller, U.S. Patent; US2003/6609883 B2, 2003.

[6] J. A. La Rose, at all; Stabilizing drive for contactless rotary blood pump impeller; U.S. Patent; US 2008/0021394 A1, 2008.

[7] L.P. Taylor, et al., Implantable electric axial-flow blood pump with blood-cooled bearing, U.S. Patent; 5951263, 1999.

[8] D. LaRose, M. Tamez, Ashenuga, C. Reyes. ASAIO Journal. 56(4), 285 (2010).

[9] A. Loforte, A. Montalto, et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 10(10), 765 (2009).

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials

The Journal of Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Commitee on Metallurgy of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.571
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.347
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.740

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 185 154 18
PDF Downloads 95 88 13