Crystal Structure And Optical Properties Of TiO2 Thin Films Prepared By Reactive RF Magnetron Sputtering

Open access

Abstract

In sputtering deposition process of TiO2, metal Ti or sintered TiO2 target is used as deposition source. In this study, we have compared the characteristic of target materials. When TiO2 target was used, stoichiometric TiO2 films was deposited under the Ar atmosphere containing 1.0% of oxygen. The highest sputtering rate under this atmosphere was 3.9nm/min at 3.4W/cm2. But, sintered TiO2 target is fragile and cannot endure higher density of input power than 3.4W/cm2. On the other hand, Ti target needs higher oxygen concentration (8%) in sputtering gas atmosphere for obtaining rutile/anatase. Even though Ti target can be input twice power density of 7.9W/cm2, the highest deposition rate for Ti target was 1.4/nm, which was ~35% of the highest rate for TiO2 target. Then we have study out the composite target consisting of Ti plate and TiO2 chips. Using the composite target, stoichiometric TiO2 films were prepared in the rate of 9.6nm/min at 6.8 W/cm2 under the atmosphere of Ar/2.5%O2. Furthermore, we have found that the TiO2 films obtained from the composite target consisted of about 100% anatase, whereas TiO2 films obtained from other target have rutile dominant structure. The optical band gap energy of the film is determined by using the Tauc plot. The calculated band gap energies for the films deposited by Ti target and composite target were 2.95 and 3.24eV, which are equivalent to that of rutile and anatase structure, respectively.

[1] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 238, 37 (1972).

[2] M. Xu, Y. Gao, E.M. Moreno, M. Kunst, M. Muhler, Y. Wang, H. Idriss, C. Wöll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 138302 (2011).

[3] K. Tanamura, Y. Abe, K. Sasaki, Vacuum. 74, 397 (2004).

[4] D. Pjević, M. Obradović, T. Marinković, A. Grce, M. Milosavljević, R. Grieseler, T. Kups, M. Wilke, P. Schaaf, Physica B. 463, 20 (2015).

[5] M. Nose, T. Kurimoto, A. Saiki, K. Matsuda, K. Terayama, J. Vac. Sci. Tecnol. 30, 1 (2012).

[6] J. Xiong, S.N. Das, S. Kim, J. Lim, H. Choi, J.M. Myoung, Surf. Coat. Technol. 204, 3436 (2010).

[7] L. Miao, P. Jin, K. Kaneko, A. Terai, N.N. Gabain, S. Tanemura, Appl. Surf. Sci. 212-213, 255 (2003).

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials

The Journal of Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Commitee on Metallurgy of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.571
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.347
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.740

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 234 224 22
PDF Downloads 110 106 8