Background and objectives: Laryngectomy with extensive extirpational neck dissection is still the treatment of choice for patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. During the initial part of laryngectomy – tracheostomy, there is a significant upper airway obstruction, caused by the cancer process itself and worsened by surgical pressure and manipulation during creation of tracheostomy. This study aims to make comparative assessment of the patient’s hemodynamic parameters, operated using three of the most popular approaches during tracheostomy: local anesthesia with preserved spontaneous ventilation; general anesthesia with ventilation by endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia with ventilation by laryngeal mask airway.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral center. Sixty patients with advanced laryngeal cancer appointed for total laryngectomy, were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned into three groups, according to the ventilation method used during the tracheostomy.
Results: Patients who underwent tracheostomy under local anesthesia displayed statistically the highest levels of SAP, DAP, MAP and heart rate intraoperatively. The group of patients who underwent tracheostomy with endotracheal intubation, also displayed significantly higher levels of hemodynamic parameters during the procedure compared with the group with laryngeal mask airway ventilation, despite the fact that both groups were under general anesthesia.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that laryngeal mask ventilation during tracheostomy improves intraoperative hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing total laryngectomy compared to endotracheal intubation.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Dyckhoff G Plinkert PK Ramroth H. A change in the study evaluation paradigm reveals that larynx preservation compromises survival in T4 laryngeal cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2017; 17(1):609.
2. Rudolph E Dyckhoff G Becher H et al. Effects of tumor stage comorbidity and therapy on survival of laryngeal cancer patients: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268(2):165-79.
3. Price GC McLellan S Paterson RL Hay A. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the LMA Supreme vs cuffed tracheal tube as the airway device during percutaneous tracheostomy. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(7):757-63.
4. Strametz R Pachler C Kramer JF et al. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 6:CD009901.
5. Pratt T Bromilow J. Laryngeal mask airway for airway control during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39(6):1009-13.
6. Pourciau DC Hotard DP 3rd Hayley S et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway ventilation in obese patients with airway stenosis. Laryngoscope 2017; doi: 10.1002/lary.26684.
7. Popov TM Marinov T Rangachev J et al. Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy. Balkan Med J 2017; 34(2):165-167.
8. Middlehurst RJ Gibbs A Walton G. Cardiovascular risk: the safety of local anesthesia vasoconstrictors and sedation in heart disease. Anesth Prog 1999; 46(4):118-23.
9. Mutoh T Tsubone H Nishimura R Sasaki N. Cardiovascular reflex mechanisms by topical instillation of capsaicin and distilled water into the larynx in anesthetized dogs. J Vet Med Sci 1997; 59(9):801-6.
10. Lee JC Stoll BJ Downing SE. Properties of the laryngeal chemoreflex in neonatal piglets. Am J Physiol 1977; 233(1):R30-6.
11. Nishino T. Physiological and pathophysiological implications of upper airway reflexes in humans. Jpn J Physiol 2000; 50(1):3-14. Review.
12. Wang X Guo R Zhao W. Distribution of Fos-Like Immunoreactivity Catecholaminergic and Serotoninergic Neurons Activated by the Laryngeal Chemoreflex in the Medulla Oblongata of Rats. PLoS One 2015; 10(6):e0130822.
13. Nandwani N Raphael JH Langton JA. Effect of an upper respiratory tract infection on upper airway reactivity. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78(4):352-5.