Prevalence Rate of Musculoskeletal Discomforts Based on Severity Level Among Office Workers

Open access


There are a variety of body aches that fall under the umbrella term of Musculoskeletal Discomforts (MSDs). These can be distinguished based on the level of pain suffered by the patient, ranging from mild and sporadic to serious, constant and fatal. It has been suggested that a link exists between MSDs and risk factors involving one’s occupational conditions and physicality. Examining the prevalence rate of musculoskeletal discomforts based on the severity among office workers was the main objective of this study. In order to achieve this objective, we had, in February 2015, selected from a population of 20 000 Malaysian office workers, 753 subjects within the age range of 20-50 years who have had a minimum of a year’s working experience. For this study, a form of structured questionnaire, known as the Cornell questionnaire, has been evaluated and put to use. Under the watch of the researchers, the subjects were instructed to complete the questionnaire in the morning before they begin their respective jobs. Based on their responses, the Cornell questionnaire has revealed that at least one case of severe pain in the neck, shoulder or lower back, respectively, is suffered by 69.7% of the subjects. In the case of neck-related aches, 15% low pain, whereas 51% involved mild pain and 33.9% were cases of severe pain. That being said, 19.3% low pain in the lower back, while 50.7% suffered from mild pain and 30% had severe pain in the same region. Percentages of 34.9% for high severity, 45.4% for mild severity and 19.7% for low severity were simultaneously reported in the shoulder section. In a nutshell, the study has revealed that, in comparison with body aches in the arms, knees, upper back, forearms, wrists, hands, hips and thighs, the subjects are more vulnerable to body aches in the neck, shoulders and lower back.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Coggon D. Ntani G. Palmer K.T. et al. Disabling musculoskeletal pain in working populations: Is it the job the person or the culture? PAIN®. Elsevier 154 2013 856-63.

  • 2. Da Costa B.R. Vieira E.R. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. American journal of industrial medicine. Wiley Online Library 53 2010 285-323.

  • 3. Eltayeb S. Staal J.B. Hassan A. De Bie R. A. Work related risk factors for neck shoulder and arms complaints: a cohort study among Dutch computer office workers. Journal of occupational rehabilitation. Springer 19 2009 315-322.

  • 4. Hagen K.B. Dagfinrud H. Moe R.H. et al. Exercise therapy for bone and muscle health: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC medicine. BioMed Central Ltd 10 2012167-174.

  • 5. Hales T.R. Sauter S.L. Peterson M.R et al. Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal users in a telecommunications company. Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis 37 1994 1603-21.

  • 6. Helmick C.G. Felson D.T. Lawrence R.C. et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: Part I. Arthritis & Rheumatism. Wiley Online Library 58 2008 15-25.

  • 7. Karayannis N.V. Jull G.A. Hodges P.W. Physiotherapy movement based classifi cation approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. BioMed Central Ltd 13 2012 24-29.

  • 8. Pronk N.P. Katz A.S. Lowry M. Payfer J.R. Peer Reviewed: Reducing Occupational Sitting Time and Improving Worker Health: The Take-a-Stand Project 2011. Preventing chronic disease. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 9 2012.

  • 9. Smith T.D. DeJoy D.M. Occupational Injury in America: An analysis of risk factors using data from the General Social Survey (GSS). Journal of safety research. Elsevier 43 2012 67-74.

  • 10. Mahmud N. Kenny D.T. Rahman H.A. The Effect of Workplace Offi ce Ergonomics Intervention on Reducing Neck and Shoulder Complaints and Sickness Absence. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research 42 2012.

  • 11. Janwantanakul P. Pensri P. Moolkay P. Jiamjarasrangsi W. Development of a risk score for low back pain in offi ce workers-a cross-sectional study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. BioMed Central Ltd 12 2011 23-29

  • 12. Miranda H. Kaila-Kangas L. Heliövaara M. Leino-Arjas P. Haukka E. Liira J. Viikari-Juntura E. Musculoskeletal pain at multiple sites and its effects on work ability in a general working population. Occupational and environmental medicine. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2010 67 449-455.

  • 13. Fabunmi A.A. Oworu J.O. Odunaiya N.A. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among Nurses in University College Hospital Ibadan. West African Journal of Nursing 19 2008.

  • 14. Jabarouti R. Shariat A. Shariat A. Effect of Persian classic poetry on the level of stress hormone in retired academicians. Journal of Poetry Therapy. Taylor & Francis 27 2013 1-9.

  • 15. Erdinc O. Hot K. Ozkaya M. Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation. IOS Press 39 2011 251-260.

  • 16. Shariat A. Tamrin S.B.M. Manohar A. Ramasamy R. The BahasaMelayu Version of Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ): Reliability and Validity Study in Malaysia. work.

  • 17. Mansor C. Hazwani C. Zakaria S.E. Dawal S.Z.M. Investigation on Working Postures and Musculoskeletal Disorders among Offi ce Workers in Putrajaya. Advanced Engineering Forum. Trans Tech Publ 2013 308-312.

  • 18. Kaliniene G. Ustinaviciene R. Skemiene L. Januskevicius V. Associations between neck musculoskeletal complaints and work related factors among public service computer workers in Kaunas. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. Springer 26 2013 670-681.

  • 19. Epstein R. Colford S. Epstein E. et al. The effects of feedback on computer workstation posture habits. Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation. IOS Press 41 2012 73-79.

  • 20. Bambra C. Lunau T. Van der. Wel. K.A. Eikemo T.A. Dragano N. Work Health and Welfare: The Association between Working Conditions Welfare States and Self-Reported General Health in Europe. International Journal of Health Services. Baywood 44 2014 113-136.

  • 21. Kawakami N. Araki S. Takatsuka N. Shimizu H. Ishibashi H. Overtime psychosocial working conditions and occurrence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Japanese men. Journal of epidemiology and community health. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 53 1999 359-363.

  • 22. Merisalu E. Oha K. Freimann T. Sirk T. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among offi ce workers nurses and caregivers in Estonia. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 68 2011 A70-A70.

  • 23. Mueller G.F. Hassenzahl M. Sitting Comfort of Ergonomic Offi ce Chairs--Developed Versus Intuitive Evaluation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 16 2010369-374.

  • 24. Mörl F. Bradl I. Lumbar posture and muscular activity while sitting during offi ce work. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. Elsevier 23 2013 362-368.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 560 282 12
PDF Downloads 888 747 8