A Review on Motion Correction Methods in Pet/Ct Images for Detection of Cancer Cells

  • 1 Department of Computer Science Faculty of Information Science and Technology University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Summary

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is an important cancer imaging tool, both for diagnosing and staging, as well as offering predictive information based on response. PET is a nuclear medicine imaging technique which produces a three-dimensional image of functional processes in the body. While PET is commonly used to detect the tumors, especially in breast, colon, lung and for lymphoma, as well in the last decade it is verified as considerably more accurate than Computed Tomography (CT) in the distinction between benign and malignant lesions. PET is not only more accurate than conventional imaging for the assessment of therapy response, but also it is useful to detect some viable tumor cells after treatment. However, motion is a source of artifacts in the medical imaging and results in reducing the quantitative and qualitative accuracy of the image. In general during the procedure of PET scanning, a few types of motion can occur that should be corrected and compensated. Different body motions are classified as brain motion, cardiac motion and respiratory motion. In this study, some of the most important motion correction and compensation methods using PET imaging system are compared.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • 1. Ambrosini, V. et al. PET/CT imaging in different types of lung cancer: an overview. - European Journal of Radiology, 81, 2012, 5, 988-1001.

  • 2. Ambwani, S. et al. Joint cardiac and respiratory motion correction and super-resolution reconstruction in coronary PET/CT. Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, IEEE International Symposium on 2011, 2011, IEEE.

  • 3. Anishchenko, S. et al. Quality Estimation Of Motion Correction For Pet Brain Images. - Southern Federal University, 2012.

  • 4. Bagci, U. et al. Joint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: Applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT images. - Medical Image Analysis, 2013, 8, 929-945.

  • 5. Bai, W. and M. Brady. Motion correction and attenuation correction for respiratory gated PET images. - Medical Imaging, 30, IEEE Transactions on 2011, 2, 351-365.

  • 6. Bettinardi, V. et al. Detection and compensation of organ/lesion motion using 4D-PET/CT respiratory gated acquisition techniques. - Radiotherapy and Oncology, 96, 2010, 3, 311-316.

  • 7. Chang, G. et al. Joint correction of respiratory motion artifact and partial volume effect in lung/thoracic PET/CT imaging. - Medical Physics, 37, 2010, 12, 6221-6232.

  • 8. Fayad, H. et al. A generic respiratory motion model for motion correction in PET/CT. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), 2010, IEEE 2010.

  • 9. Ferlay, J. et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1. 0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer- Base № 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. - Last accessed April 2014.

  • 10. Fredberg Persson, G. et al. Artifacts in conventional computed tomography (CT) and free breathing four-dimensional CT induce uncertainty in gross tumor volume determination. - International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 80, 2011, 5, 1573-1580.

  • 11. He, J., et al. Motion compensation based on dynamic data in PET acquisition. Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 2010 3rd International Conference on 2010, IEEE.

  • 12. Keller, S. H. et al. Methods for motion correction evaluation using 18F-FDG human brain scans on a high-resolution PET scanner. - Journal of Nuclear Medicine 53, 2012, 3, 495-504.

  • 13. Lee, P. et al. Current concepts in F18 FDG PET/CT-based radiation therapy planning for lung cancer. - Frontiers in Oncology, 2, 2012.

  • 14. Li, G. et al. Correction of motion-induced misalignment in co-registered PET/CT and MRI (T1/T2/ FLAIR) head images for stereotactic radiosurgery. - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 12, 2010, 1.

  • 15. Marache-Francisco, S. et al. Impact of respiratory motion correction on the detection of small lesions in whole-body PET imaging: a simulation study. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), IEEE, 2010.

  • 16. McClelland, J. R. et al. Respiratory motion models: A review. - Medical Image Analysis, 17, 2013, 1, 19-42.

  • 17. McQuaid, S. J. et al. A novel method for incorporating respiratory-matched attenuation correction in the motion correction of cardiac PET-CT studies. - Physics in Medicine and Biology, 56, 2011, 10, 2903.

  • 18. Nehmeh, S. A. et al. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. - Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 43, 2002, 7, 876-881.

  • 19. Noonan, P. et al. Accurate markerless respiratory tracking for gated whole body PET using the Microsoft Kinect. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), IEEE, 2012.

  • 20. Pépin, A. et al. Management of respiratory motion in PET/computed tomography: the state of the art. - Nuclear Medicine Communications, 35, 2014, 2, 113.

  • 21. Rahmim, A. et al. Strategies for motion tracking and correction in PET. - PET Clinics, 2, 2007, 2, 251-266.

  • 22. Saha, G. B. Data Acquisition and Corrections. - Basics of PET Imaging, Springer, 2010: 41-69.

  • 23. Takeuchi, S. et al. Impact of initial PET/CT staging in terms of clinical stage, management plan, and prognosis in 592 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 41, 2014, 5, 906-914.

OPEN ACCESS

Zeitschrift + Hefte

Suche