Sky-Hook Control and Kalman Filtering in Nonlinear Model of Tracked Vehicle Suspension System

Open access


The essence of the undertaken topic is application of the continuous sky-hook control strategy and the Extended Kalman Filter as the state observer in the 2S1 tracked vehicle suspension system. The half-car model of this suspension system consists of seven logarithmic spiral springs and two magnetorheological dampers which has been described by the Bingham model. The applied continuous sky-hook control strategy considers nonlinear stiffness characteristic of the logarithmic spiral springs. The control is determined on estimates generated by the Extended Kalman Filter. Improve of ride comfort is verified by comparing simulation results, under the same driving conditions, of controlled and passive vehicle suspension systems.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Bajkowski J. M. (2012) Design Analysis and Performance Evaluation of the Linear Magnetorheological Damper Acta Mechanica et Automatica 6 5-9.

  • 2. Becerra V. M. Roberts P. D. Griffiths G. W. (2001) Applying the extended Kalman filter to systems described by nonlinear differential-algebraic equations Control Engineering Practice 9(3) 267-281.

  • 3. Jamroziak K. Kosobudzki M. Ptak J. (2013) Assessment of the comfort of passenger transport in special purpose vehicles Eksploatacja i Niezawodność 15(1) 25-30.

  • 4. Julier S.J. Uhlmann J.K. (2004) Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation Proceedings of the IEEE 92(3) 401-422.

  • 5. Jurkiewicz A. Nabagło T. Kowal J. Apostoł M. (2014) A new suspension system of an autonomous caterpillar platform Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 52(4) 857-867.

  • 6. Karnopp D. Crosby M. J. Harwood R. A. (1974) Vibration control using semi-active force generators Journal of Engineering for Industry 96(2) 619-626.

  • 7. Laalej H. Lang Z. Q. Sapinski B. Martynowicz P. (2012) MR damper based implementation of nonlinear damping for a pitch plane suspension system Smart Materials and Structures 21(4) 045006.

  • 8. Lam A. H. F. Liao W. H. (2003) Semi-active control of automotive suspension systems with magneto-rheological dampers International Journal of Vehicle Design 33(1-3) 50-75.

  • 9. Li H. Goodall R. M. (1999) Linear and non-linear skyhook damping control laws for active railway suspensions Control Engineering Practice 7(7) 843-850.

  • 10. Lindgärde O. (2002). Kalman filtering in semi-active suspension control Proceedings of 15th IFAC World Congress 1539-1544.

  • 11. Machoczek T. Mężyk A. (2015) The multi-wheeled vehicle’s suspension control (in Polish) Przegląd Mechaniczny 1 19-25.

  • 12. Nabagło T. Jurkiewicz A. Apostoł M. Micek P. (2014) Simulation of 2S1 tracked vehicle model with modernized suspension system during crossing a single obstacle Solid State Phenomena Trans Tech Publications 208 140-147.

  • 13. Nabagło T. Jurkiewicz A. Kowal J. (2015) Semi-active suspension system for 2S1 tracked platform in application of improvement of the vehicle body stability Applied Mechanics and Materials 759 77-90.

  • 14. Rybak P. Borkowski W. Wysocki J. Hryciów Z. Michałowski B. (2011) Model research of the light tank basing on multi-task combat platform (in Polish) Szybkobieżne Pojazdy Gąsienicowe 2 39-46.

  • 15. Sapiński B. Filuś J. (2003) Analysis of parametric models of MR linear damper Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 41(2) 215-240.

  • 16. Sapiński B. Jastrzębski Ł. Węgrzynowski M. (2011) Modelling of a self-powered vibration reduction system (in Polish) Modelowanie Inżynierskie 10(41) 353-362.

  • 17. Simon D. Ahmadian M. (2001) Vehicle evaluation of the performance of magneto rheological dampers for heavy truck suspensions Journal of Vibration and Acoustics Transactions of the ASME 123(3) 365-375.

  • 18. Snamina J. Podsiadło A. Orkisz P. (2009) Skyhook vibration control with energy regenerative system Mechanics 28 124-130.

  • 19. Spencer Jr. B. F. Dyke S. J. Sain M. K. Carlson J. (1997) Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers Journal of engineering mechanics 123(3) 230-238.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.77

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.243
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.615

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 357 184 4
PDF Downloads 247 137 7