The Potential of New Streptomyces Isolates as Biocontrol Agents Against Fusarium Spp

Mihaela Ursan 1 , Oana Alina Boiu-Sicuia 1 , Cătălina Voaides 1 , Vasilica Stan 1 , Corina Bubueanu 2 , and Călina Petruţa Cornea 1
  • 1 University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Faculty of Biotechnologies, 59 Mărăști Blvd,, Bucharest, Romania
  • 2 National Institute of Chemical-Pharmaceutical Research and Development,112 Vitan St., District 3,, Bucharest, Romania


The excessive use of synthetic pesticides for plant pathogens control could cause possible harmful side-effects to humans and animals, environmental pollution, residual toxicity, affects soil characteristics or induce the development of fungal resistance. Alternative ways for fungal contamination control involve natural products, based on microorganisms, many of them being already available for use. The selection and characterization of new biological agents useful for plant pathogens control are permanent goals for plant protection researches. In the last decade, several studies revealed that Streptomyces species are promising biocontrol agents against a wide range of phytopathogenic fungi, including Fusarium spp., one of the most important wheat pathogens. In our study, 60 strains of Streptomyces spp. were isolated from soil or compost and evaluated for in vitro antifungal abilities by dual confrontation method. At least 30% of the isolates presented inhibitory activity against F. culmorum and F. graminearum. The bacterial strains were also tested for their ability to produce various bioactive compounds, possible involved in fungal inhibition. The capacity of some of the bacterial isolates to produce cellulases, amylases, lipases and volatile metabolites was proved. In addition, a new screening method for chitinases production was developed, based on the use of a combination of Congo red and Lugol solutions, which allowed the detection of chitinases in several Streptomyces spp. strains. Moreover, the reduction of the level of some Fusarium mycotoxins was detected by HPTLC analysis. As a conclusion, antagonistic interactions between Streptomyces isolates and fusaria could involve antibiosis, competition and parasitism and suggested that at least some of the selected isolates could be used in obtaining biological control products.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Chandra N.S., Wulff E.G., Udayashankar A.C., Nandini B.P., Niranjana S.R., Mortensen C.N., Prakash H.S., 2011. Prospects of molecular markers in Fusarium species diversity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 90(5): 1625 -1639.

  • Ciobotaru A.O., Grosu A.I., Dobre A., Cornea C.P., 2015. In vitro efficacy of selected LAB strains against aflatoxigenic fungi. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 48(2): 50-54.

  • Dudoiu R., Cristea S., Lupu C., Popa D., Oprea M., 2016. Micoflora associated with maize grains during storage period. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 5(1): 63-68.

  • Grosu I., Israel-Roming F., Sicuia O.A., Constantinescu F., Popa G., Cornea C.P., 2014. Effect of some bacterial antagonists on growth and mycotoxin production of Fusarium graminearum and F.culmorum isolates. Scientific Bulletin. Series F. Biotechnologies, 15: 26-31.

  • Hamedi J., Poorinmohammad N., Wink J., 2017. The role of actinobacteria in biotechnology, In Biology and Biotechnology of Actinobacteria, Wink J., Mohammadipanah J., Hamedi J. (Eds), Springer, 269-328.

  • Islam R., Jeong Y.T., Ryu Y.J., Song C.H., Lee Y.S., 2009. Isolation, identification and optimal culture conditions of Streptomyces albidoflavus C247 producing antifungal agents against Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2. Mycobiology. 37(2): 114-120.

  • Jouany J.P., 2007. Methods for preventing, decontaminating and minimizing the toxicity of mycotoxins in feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 137(3): 342-362.

  • Junaid J.M., Dar N.A., Bhat T.A., Bhat A.H., Bhat M.A., 2013. Commercial biocontrol agents and their mechanism of action in the management of plant pathogens. International Journal of Modern Plant & Animal Sciences, 1(2): 39-57.

  • Kim S.H., Vujanovic V., 2016. Relationship between mycoparasites lifestyles and biocontrol behaviors against Fusarium spp. and mycotoxins production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100(12): 5257 - 5272.

  • Law J.W.F., Ser H.L., Khan T.M., Chuah L.H., Pusparajah P., Chan K.G., Goh B.H., Lee L.H., 2017. The potential of Streptomyces as biocontrol agents against the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae (Pyricularia oryzae). Frontiers in microbiology, 8:3.

  • Legrand F., Picot A., Cobo-Díaz J.F., Chen W., Le Floch G., 2017. Challenges facing the biological control strategies for the management of Fusarium Head Blight of cereals caused by F. graminearum. Biological Control, 113: 26-38.

  • Liu Q., Yu J., Yan J., Qi X., Liu C., Jin H., 2009. Antagonism and action mechanism of antifungal metabolites from Streptomyces rimosus MY02. Journal of Phytopathology, 157: 306-310.

  • Miller J.D., 2008. Mycotoxins in small grains and maize: old problems, new challenges. Food Additives & Contaminants, 25: 219-230.

  • Munkvold G.P., 2017. Fusarium Species and Their Associated Mycotoxins. Mycotoxigenic Fungi: Methods and Protocols, 1542: 51-106.

  • Nguyen P.A., Strub C., Fontana A., Schorr-Galindo S., 2017. Crop molds and mycotoxins: Alternative management using biocontrol. Biological Control, 104: 10-27.

  • Nguyen T.M., Kim J., 2015. Antifungal and antibacterial activities of Streptomyces polymachus sp. nov. isolated from soil. International Journal of Systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 65(8): 2385-2390.

  • Oskay M., 2009. Antifungal and antibacterial compounds from Streptomyces strains. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(13): 3007-3017.

  • Rocha O., Ansari K., Doohan F.M., 2005. Effects of trichothecene mycotoxins on eukaryotic cells: a review. Food Additives and Contaminants, 22(4): 369-378.

  • Saxena A.K., Pal K.K., Tilak K.V.B.R., 2000. Bacterial biocontrol agents and their role in plant disease management. In: Biocontrol potential and its exploitation in sustainable agriculture, Upadhyay R.K., Mukerji K.G., Chamola B.P. (eds), Springer US, pp. 25-37.

  • Sicuia O.A., Israel-Roming F., Ciobotaru O., Matei A., Zamfir M., Ciuca M., Cornea C.P., 2014. Antifungal action of lactic acid bacteria isolated from plant materials against mycotoxigenic fungi. Scientific Bulletin. Series F. Biotechnologies, 15: 234-240.

  • Tsitsigiannis D.I., Dimakopoulou M., Antoniou P.P., Tjamos E., 2012. Biological control strategies of mycotoxigenic fungi and associated mycotoxins in Mediterranean basin crops. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 51(1):158-174.

  • Zain M.E., 2011. Impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 15(2): 129-144.

  • Zhang J., Zhang L., 2011. Improvement of an isolation medium for actinomycetes. Modern Applied Science, 5(2): 124-127.

  • Ziedan E.H., Farrag E.S., El-Mohamedy R.S., Abd Alla M.A., 2010. Streptomyces alni as a biocontrol agent to root-rot of grapevine and increasing their efficiency by biofertilisers inocula. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43(7): 634-646.


Journal + Issues