Widening the Scope and Scale of Sustainability Assessments in Built Environments: From Passive House to Active Neighbourhood

Open access


The paper provide an insight into the research conducted by the University of Ljubljana, and the Urban institute of Slovenia committed to the assessment of the efficiency related to the management of local resources at the level of neighbourhoods. The reduction of energy consumption and energy efficient built environments are key objectives of many sustainability agendas which is followed by suitable assessment methods in urban analytics. However, there are two important hesitations occurring: first, traditional assessment methods that focus solely on the energy reduction and efficiency are often too narrow in their analysis and limited in their scope of impact. According to the recent advances in research worldwide, efforts solely related to reduction of energy consumption will unlikely lead to more responsive environments or rise the living quality. Thus, more comprehensive methodologies for assessing and monitoring the change and transformation in built environments shall be sought for to reach long-term sustainability. Second, to date, the majority of the evaluation methods - whether focusing to energy consumption or broader sustainability issues - are building- or household- oriented, thus systematically examining separate spatial and social entities, but neglecting the spaces between, the holistic aspect and the community aspect. The research develops structured evaluation model, where two main research pillars are addressed: 1) the development of the structured and modular system of indicators; and 2) the development of the methodology to interpret the resulting values. The paper presents first two stages of the research process and subjects the outcomes to the debate.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Batty M. (2012). Urban Regeneration as Self-Organization. Architectural Design 215 54-59

  • Berardi U. (2013). Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environment Development and Sustainability 15(6) 1573-1591.

  • Bird K. (2015). Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment: Connecting Impact with Policy Intent. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.

  • Blum A. Grant M. (2006). Sustainable neighbourhoods: Assessment tools for renovation and development. Journal of International Research Publications: Ecology and Safety 1 37-54.

  • Bourdic L. Salat S. Nowacki C. (2012). Assessing cities: a new system of cross-scale spatial indicators Building Research & Information 40(5) 592-605.

  • Clark H. Aranoff M. Lavine E. Suteethorn K. (2013). LEED for Neighborhood Development: Does it Capture Livability? Berkeley Planning Journal 26(1) 150-166.

  • Choguill C. L. (2008). Developing Sustainable Neighborhoods. Habitat International 32 41-48.

  • Haapio A. (2012). Towards sustainable urban communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32(1) 165-169.

  • Karol E. (2009). Tools for Measuring Progress Towards Sustainable Neighborhood Environments. Sustainability 1 612-627.

  • Kreutz S. (2009). Urban Improvement Districts in Germany: New legal instruments for joint proprietor activities in area development. J Urban Regeneration & Renewal 2 304-317.

  • Lin K.W. Shih C.M. (2016). The Comparative Analysis of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. [Online] Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265813516667299?ssource=mfr&rss=1 (November 2017).

  • Lombardi P. Trossero E. (2013). Beyond energy efficiency in evaluating sustainable development in planning and the built environment. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development 4(4) 274-282 2013.

  • Lützkendorf T. Balouktsi M. (2017). Assessing a Sustainable Urban Development: Typology of Indicators and Sources of Information. Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 546-553.

  • Mori K. & Christodoulou A. (2012). Review of Sustainability Indices and Indicators: Towards a New City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32 94-106.

  • Säynäjoki E. Kyrö R. Heinonen J. Junnila S. (2012). An assessment of the applicability of three international neighbourhood sustainability rating systems to diverse local conditions with a focus on Nordic case areas. Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev. 2012 3 96-104.

  • Sharifi A Murayama A. (2015). Viability of using global standards for neighbourhood sustainability assessment: Insights from a comparative case study. J Environ Plan Manage 58 1-23.

  • Sharifi A. & Murayama A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 38 73-87.

  • Sullivan L. Rydin Y. (2015). Neighbourhood Sustainability Frameworks - A Literature Review. London: Centre for Urban Sustainability and Resilience College London.

  • Waldron D. and Miller D. (2013). Regenerative Sustainability at the Neighborhood Scale. US: University of British Columbia.

  • Zheng H.W. Shen G Yan Song Sun B. Hong J. (2016). Neighborhood sustainability in urban renewal: An assessment framework. Environment and Planning B 44(5) 903 - 924.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 281 145 1
PDF Downloads 155 105 4