How some Seemingly Moderate Political Elections Results may Redirect a State’s Historical Course, from the Top Down to the Transformation of National Growth and Socio-Cultural Development Patterns: Turkey’s Political Reforms over the Last Decades as an Ideal Paradigm of Multi- Faceted National Re-Orientation

Open access


This paper discusses a model for identifying and evaluating how the critical changes in the politics of a state impact its socio-economic life. Political transitions of this magnitude may stem out of elections results, but they are not limited to governmental reforms, since they further create a historical rift between the former and the latter status. They definitely initiate regime turnovers, geostrategic reorientation and shifts of geopolitical axes, but they also transform the national growth and socio-cultural development structures and features.The case study chosen refers to Turkey’s political transformation over the last decades; it is considered an ideal paradigm for testing the relevant research questions due to the extent and depth of the revolutionary changes triggered by the Islamic or the so called neoottoman political parties taking over power and overthrowing the long-lasting status quo of kemalism. The consequences of the before mentioned political shift are being examined in correlation with certain statistical indicators like students’ enrolment in the education system. The statistics are projected over a time series covering previous and current status. Then they are mapped via a Geographic Information System on a regional spatial context towards more comprehensive visual representation and further interpretation of the structural changes indicated.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anayasa Y. (2011). Expectations of the Turkish Society from the New Constitution. Istanbul: Wise Men Center for Strategic Studies (Online) Available: (Accessed on 21 December 2017)

  • Baltos G C Vidakis I G & Balodis J. (2017). Turkey’s Ambitions to Emerge as a Regional Power: Example or Counter-Example for Potential Aspiring Competitors. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 6 33 -46.

  • Brezzi M. (2012). Territorial Grids of OECD Member Countries. Paris: Directorate of Public Governance and Territoral Development.

  • Cagaptay S. (2014). The Rise of Turkey: The Twenty-First Century's First Muslim Power. Nebraska:Potomac Books Inc Nebraska Press.

  • Celebioglu F & Dall’erba S. (2010). Spatial disparities across the regions of Turkey: an exploratory spatial data analysis Ann Reg Sci 45 379-400.

  • Ciddi S. (2009). Kemalism in Turkish Politics: The Republican People's Party Secularism and Nationalism. Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames.

  • Cizre Ü. (2008). Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Making of the Justice and Development Party Routledge Abingdon-on-Thames.

  • Erickson E.J. and A. Hook. (2013). Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

  • ErisenC. (2014). Political Psychology of Turkish Political Behavior. Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames.

  • EUROSTAT Statistics Explained. (2017). EU imports of energy products - recent. (Online) Available: developments (Accessed on 13 November 2017)

  • Friedman G. (2016). Beyond the Turkish Coup Geopolitical Futures 10 pp. 1 -5.

  • Gallagher M & Mitchel P. (2005). The Politics of Electoral Systems Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Gokhan Ulum O. (2014). Recep Tayyip Erdogan: The Brave Heart: The Father of New Turkey Maryland: America Star Books.

  • Guiler K (2016). Towards Erdogan and the East: Conspiracies and public perception in post-coup. Istanbul: Turkey Contemporary Turkish Politics Project on Middle East Political Science.

  • Jackson R. Sorensen G. (2006). Θεωρία και Μεθοδολογία των Διεθνών Σχέσεων» (μεταφρ. Κωνσταντινίδης Χαρ.) εκδ. Gutenberg σελ. 114-127.

  • Kabir T. (2014). The Reckoning of Pluralism - Political Belonging and The Demands of History of Turkey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Karaosmanoglu A. (2011). Armed Forces and Democracy. Istanbul: Wise Men Center for Strategic Studies.

  • Karkazis J. Baltos G. Vidakis I. (2017). The current Turkish geopolitics as a product of personal leadership aspirations challenging traditional methods of risk management and power measurement. Foreign affairs: the Hellenic edition 47 94-115.

  • Kocamaner H. (2015). How New Is Erdoğan’s “New Turkey”? Middle East Brief 91 1 - 9.

  • Metin H and Toktas S. (2003). Islam Modernity and Democracy in Contemporary Turkey: The Case of Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The Muslim World 2 157-185.

  • Nadolski D J. 2000. The etatist Turkish Republic and its political and socio-economic performance from 1980-1999: A developing state impacted by international organizations and interdependence. 9999155 Ph.D. Kansas: University of Missouri - Kansas City.

  • OECD. (2011). OECD Regions at a Glance 2011. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Organisation de Cooperation et de Developpement Economiques.

  • OECD. (2017). OECD Regions at a Glance. (Online) Available:;jsessionid=1knjt7wsr5jd0.epsilon (Accessed on 21 December 2017)

  • Oguz I and Pinarcioglu M. (2006). Geographies of a silent transition: a geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey European Journal of Population No 390 - 399.

  • Öztürk I. (2011). Political economy of Erdoğan’s success story in Turkey. London: Al Jazeera Centre for Studies.

  • Phillips D L. (2017). An Uncertain Ally: Turkey under Erdogan's Dictatorship.Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames.

  • Przeworski A. (2009). The Mechanics of Regime Instability in Latin America in: Journal of Politics in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1 1 5-36.

  • Robinson J C. Sharon B. Wyatt S B Hickson D Gwinn D Faruque F Sims M Sarpong D and Herman A. Taylor. (2010). "Methods for Retrospective Geocoding in Population Studies: The Jackson Heart Study. Journal of Urban Health 87136-50.

  • Senay B. (2013). Beyond Turkey’s Borders - Long - Distance Kemalism State Politics and the Turkish Diaspora London: I. B. Tauris.

  • Seufert G. (2014). Erdoğan’s “New Turkey” Restoring the Authoritarian State in the Name of Democracy. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs. SWP Comments.

  • Somuncu M. (2006). Achieving Universal Primary Education in Mountains: Turkey's Education Campaign for Girls: "Off to School Girls!" ("Haydi Kizlar Okula!"). Mountain Research and Development 120-23.

  • Tugal C. (2016). The Fall of the Turkish Model: How the Arab Uprisings Brought Down Islamic Liberalism New York: Verso Books.

  • Turkish Statistical Institute. (2017). Income Living Consumption and Poverty. (Online) Available;jsessionid=3ggrP2sXjmLF2MQmRLnLqJWlnnL2LB31QH9BvJNXQW7rC2Q7xLlB!-1998769340 (Accessed on 21 December 2017)

  • UNDP. (2016). Human Development Statistics. (Online) Available (Accessed on 21 December 2017)

  • White J. (2011) Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics University of Washington Press Washington.

  • Yavuz E A (2010). Wage Inequality in Turkey: Decomposition by Statistical Regions 1980-2001. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies 1 55 - 72.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 217 107 0
PDF Downloads 99 74 0