Bioassay and alpha spectrometry in indirect monitoring of Spanish workers exposed to enriched uranium

1. Empresa Nacional del Uranio, SA (ENUSA) [displayed 25 July 2019]. Available at: http://www.enusa.es/en/areas-de-negocio/nuclear/fabricacion/Search in Google Scholar

2. ISO 11929-1:2010. Determination of the characteristic limits (decision threshold, detection limit and limits of the confidence interval) for measurements of ionizing radiation. Fundamentals and application. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

3. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Indirect Methods for Measuring Radionuclides in the Human Body. Safety Report Series 18. Vienna; IAEA; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

4. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Manual of radiobioassay chemistry analytical techniques. LA-10300-M. Health and Environmental Chemistry, HSE-9. Los Alamos, New Mexico; Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1987.Search in Google Scholar

5. ISO 16638-1:2015. Radiological protection - Monitoring and internal dosimetry for specific materials. Part 1: Inhalation of uranium compounds. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

6. European Commission. Technical Recommendations for Monitoring Individuals for Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides. Radiation Protection Nº 188. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

7. Robredo LM, Navarro T, Sierra I. Indirect monitoring of internal exposure in the decommissioning of a nuclear power plant in Spain. Appl Radiat Isot 2000;53:345–50. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00151-210.1016/S0969-8043(00)00151-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Robredo LM, Serrano J, Sierra I, Navarro T. Técnicas de medida de uranio en muestras de orina. Aplicación en dosimetría interna de uranio natural y empobrecido [Uranium measurement techniques in urine samples. Application in internal dosimetry of natural and depleted uranium; in Spanish]. In: CIEMAT. Participación del CIEMAT en la 27 Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Nuclear Española [Participation of CIEMAT in 27th annual meeting of the Spanish Nuclear Society; in Spanish] 2001; P1-23. ISBN: 84-7834-415-2.Search in Google Scholar

9. López MA, Sierra S, Sierra I, Hernández C, Pérez A. Dose Assessment of workers long term exposed to chronic intakes of enriched uranium. In: The 12^th international conference on the Health Effects of Incorporated Radionuclides HEIR2018; 8–11 October 2018. Fontenay-aux-Roses, France [displayed 25 July 2019]. Available at https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2019/03/bioconf_heir2018_03006Search in Google Scholar

10. Lopez MA, Martin R, Hernandez C, Navarro JF, Navarro T, Perez B, Sierra I. The challenge of CIEMAT Internal Dosimetry Service for accreditation according to ISO/IEC 17025 standard, for in vivo and in vitro monitoring and dose assessment of internal exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016;170:31–4. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv38710.1093/rpd/ncv387Search in Google Scholar

11. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

12. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Individual Monitoring for Internal Exposure of Workers (preface and glossary missing). ICRP Publication 78. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

13. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

14. Young DS, Pestaner LC, Gibberman V. Effect of drugs on clinical laboratory tests. Clin Chem 1975;21:1D–432D. PMID: 1091375.Search in Google Scholar

15. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values. ICRP Publication 89. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

16. Hallstadius L. A method for the electrodeposition of actinides. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res 1984;223:266–7. doi: 10.1016/0167-5087(84)90659-810.1016/0167-5087(84)90659-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Birchall A, Puncher M, Marsh JW, Davis K, Bailey MR, Jarvis NS, Peach AD, Dorrian M-D, James AC. IMBA Professional Plus: a flexible approach to internal dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007;125:194–7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl17110.1093/rpd/ncl17117132655Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Castellani CM, Marsh JW, Hurtgen C, Blanchardon E, Berard P, Giussani A, Lopez MA. EURADOS-IDEAS Guidelines (Version 2) for the Estimation of Committed Doses from Incorporation Monitoring Data. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016;170:17–20. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv45710.1093/rpd/ncv45726541189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. ISO 27048:2011. Radiological protection - Dose assessment for the monitoring of workers for internal radiation exposure. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hernández C, Sierra I. Retrospective method validation and uncertainty estimation for actinides determination in excreta by alpha spectrometry. Radiat Prot Dosim 2016;170:39–44. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv41810.1093/rpd/ncv41826424133Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. The Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS). Responsibility for People and the Environment [displayed 25 July 2019). Available at http://www.bfs.deSearch in Google Scholar

22. PROCORAD organises radiotoxicology intercomparisons in order to evaluate the quality of medical analysis results and to promote good laboratory practice [displayed 25 July 2019). Available at http://www.procorad.orgSearch in Google Scholar

23. ISO 28218:2010. Radiological protection – Performance criteria for radiobioassay. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2010Search in Google Scholar