The role of physics in radioecology and radiotoxicology

1. Becquerel H. [Sur les radiations émises par phosphorescence, in French]. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci 1896;122:501-3.Search in Google Scholar

2. Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M. Six Easy Pieces: Essentials of Physics Explained by Its Most Brilliant Teacher. New York: Basic Books; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

3. Magill J, Dreher R, Sóti Zs. Karlsruher Nuklidkarte / Chart of the Nuclides. 10^th ed. Karlsruhe: Nucleonica GmbH; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

4. Cetnar J. General solution of Bateman equations for nuclear transmutations. Ann Nucl Energy 2006;33:640-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.00410.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Wong SSM. Introductory Nuclear Physics. 2^nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag Gmbl I & Co. KGaA; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rytz A. Recommended energy and intensity values of alpha particles from radioactive decay. At Data Nucl Data Tables 1991;47:205-39. doi: 10.1016/0092-640X(91)90002-L10.1016/0092-640X(91)90002-Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Magill J, Galy J. Radioactivity Radionuclides Radiation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2005. doi: 10.1007/b13823610.1007/b138236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Sigmund P. Particle Penetration and Radiation Effects. General Aspects and Stopping of Swift Point Charges. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. doi: 10.1007/3-540-31718-X10.1007/3-540-31718-XSearch in Google Scholar

9. Cherry SR, Sorenson J, Phelps ME. Physics in Nuclear Medicine. 4^th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.10.1016/B978-1-4160-5198-5.00001-0Search in Google Scholar

10. Van der Stricht, Etienne, Kirchmann R, editors. Radioecology: Radioactivity and Ecosystems. Liege, Fortemps: Union Internationale de Radioécologie; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

11. Samat SB, Green S, Beddoe AH. The ⁴⁰K activity of one gram of potassium. Phys Med Biol 1997;42:407-13. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/5/02710.1088/0031-9155/43/5/027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Papastefanou C. Radioactive aerosols. In: Papastefanou C, editor. Radioactivity in the environment. Vol. 12. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 11-58.10.1016/S1569-4860(07)12002-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Gosse JC, Phillips FM. Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application. Quat Sci Rev 2001;20:1475-560. doi: 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00171-210.1016/S0277-3791(00)00171-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Babić D, Senčar J, Petrinec B, Marović G, Bituh T, Skoko B. Fine structure of the absorbed dose rate monitored in Zagreb, Croatia, in the period 1985-2011. J Environ Radioact 2013;118:75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.11.01210.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.11.01223257217Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Babić D, Senčar J. Periodic behaviour in ground-level environmental radioactivity: fingerprints of solar activity? Proc R Soc A 2018;474:20180109. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2018.010910.1098/rspa.2018.0109Search in Google Scholar

16. Usoskin IG. A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Rev Sol Phys 2017;14:3. doi: 10.1007/s41116-017-0006-910.1007/s41116-017-0006-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. McCracken KG, Beer J, McDonald FB. A five-year variability in the modulation of the galactic cosmic radiation over epochs of low solar activity. Geophys Res Lett 2002;29:14-1-4. doi: 10.1029/2002GL01578610.1029/2002GL015786Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Bakr WF. Assessment of the radiological impact of oil refining industry. J Environ Radioact 2010;101: 237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.11.00510.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.11.00520005611Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Saueia CH, Mazzilli BP. Distribution of natural radionuclides in the production and use of phosphate fertilizers in Brazil. J Environ Radioact 2006;89:229-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.05.00910.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.05.00916849030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Podgorsak EB, editor. Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

21. Mattos DMM, Gomes ML, Freitas RS, Moreno S, Lima-Filho GL, Paula EF, Jales RLC, Bernardo-Filho M. Which are the most used radionuclides in the pet and in the spect techniques in the world? J Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2001;44(Suppl 1):S841-3. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.2580440129510.1002/jlcr.25804401295Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). A Basic Toxicity Classification of Radionuclides: Report of Joint Study of a Group of Consultants to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna: IAEA; 1963.Search in Google Scholar

23. Desouky O, Ding N, Zhou G. Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2015;8:247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.00310.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.003Search in Google Scholar

24. Lomax ME, Folkes LK, O’Neill P. Biological consequences of radiation-induced DNA damage: relevance to radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 2013;25:578-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.06.00710.1016/j.clon.2013.06.00723849504Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Tuszynski JA, Dixon JM. Biomedical Applications for Introductory Physics. New York: Wiley; 2002.10.1088/0143-0807/23/5/601Search in Google Scholar

26. Šoštarić M. Radiološka svojstva tla u Republci Hrvatskoj [Radiological properties of soil in the Republic of Croatia, in Croatian]. [PhD thesis]. Zagreb: Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

27. Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A, Barros-Dios JM, Baysson H, Bochicchio F, Deo H, Falk R, Forastiere F, Hakama M, Heid I, Kreienbrock L, Kreuzer M, Lagarde F, Mäkeläinen I, Muirhead C, Oberaigner W, Pershagen G, Ruano-Ravina A, Ruosteenoja E, Schaffrath Rosario A, Tirmarche M, Tomášek L, Whitley E, Wichmann H-E, Doll R. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from European case-control studies. BMJ 2005;330:223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.6310.1136/bmj.38308.477650.6354606615613366Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Larsson LS. Risk-reduction strategies to expand radon care planning with vulnerable groups. Public Health Nurs 2014;31:526-36. doi: 10.1111/phn.1211110.1111/phn.12111485273424547763Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2006.06.00110.1016/j.icrp.2006.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, General Safety Requirements. Vienna: IAEA; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

31. Mettler FA. Medical effects and risks of exposure to ionising radiation. J Radiol Prot 2012;32:N9-13. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N910.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N922395124Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, General Safety Guide. Vienna: IAEA; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

33. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaidern M. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13761-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.223559210010.1073/pnas.223559210028349514610281Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 2009;251:13-22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.251108067110.1148/radiol.2511080671266358419332842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar