The influence of shear stress on the adhesion capacity of Legionella pneumophila

1. Heng BH, Goh KT, Ng DL, Ling AE. Surveillance of legionellosis and Legionella bacteria in the built environment in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;6:557-65. PMID: 9494658Search in Google Scholar

2. Den Boer JW, Yzerman EPF, Schellekens J, Lettinga KD, Boshuizen, HC, Van Steenbergen JE, Bosman A, Van den Hof S, Van Vliet HA, Peeters MF, Van Ketel RJ, Speelman P, Kool JL, Van Spaendonck MAEC. A large outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease at a flower show, the Netherlands, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:37-43. PMCID: PMC2730281Search in Google Scholar

3. Greig JE, Carnie JA, Tallis GF, Ryan NJ, Tan AG, Gordon IR, Zwolak B, Leydon JA, Guest CS, Hart WG. An outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease at the Melbourne Aquarium, April 2000: investigation and case-control studies. Med J Australia 2004; 180: 566-72. PMID: 1517498710.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06093.x15174987Search in Google Scholar

4. Fliermans CB, Cherry WB, Orrison LH, Smith SJ, Tison DL, Pope SH. Ecological distribution of Legionella pneumophila. Appl Environ Microbiol 1981;41:9-16. PMCID: PMC24363310.1128/aem.41.1.9-16.19812436337013702Search in Google Scholar

5. Surman-Lee S, Fields B, Hornei B, Ewig S, Exner M, Tartakovsky I, Lajoie L, Dangendorf F, Bentham R, Cabanes PA, Fourrier P, Trouvet T, Wallet F. Ecology and environmental sources of Legionella. In: Bartram J, Chartier Y, Lee JV, Pond K, Surman-Lee S, editors. Legionella and the prevention of legionellosis. 1st ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2007. p. 29-38.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rendueles O, Ghigo JM. Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012;36:972-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00328.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284:1318-22. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318Search in Google Scholar

8. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001;358:135-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1Search in Google Scholar

9. Coquet L, Cosette P, Junter GA, Beucher E, Saiter JM, Jouenne T. Adhesion of Yersinia ruckeri to fish farm materials: influence of cell and material surface properties. Colloids Surf B 2002;26:373-8. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00023-1Search in Google Scholar

10. Teixeira P, Silva S, Araújo F, Azeredo J, Oliveira R. Bacterial adhesion to food contacting surfaces. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Communicating current research and educational topics and trends in applied microbiology. Vol. 1. Formatex, 2007. p. 13-20.Search in Google Scholar

11. Rogers J, Dowsett AB, Dennis PJ, Lee JV, Keevil CW. Influence of plumbing materials on biofilm formation and growth of Legionella pneumophila in potable water systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994;60:1842-51. PMCID: PMC20157110.1128/aem.60.6.1842-1851.199420157116349278Search in Google Scholar

12. Türetgen I, Cotuk A. Monitoring of biofilm-associated Legionella pneumophila on different substrata in model cooling tower system. Environ Monit Assess 2007;125:271-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9519-8Search in Google Scholar

13. Moritz MM, Flemming H, Wingender J. Integration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella pneumophila in drinking water biofilms grown on domestic plumbing materials. Int J Hyg Environ Heal 2010;213:190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.003Search in Google Scholar

14. Vickery K, Pajkos A, Cossart Y. Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: Evaluation of detergent efficiency. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.009Search in Google Scholar

15. Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cells Mater 2004;8:37-57. PMID: 1559301810.22203/eCM.v008a05Search in Google Scholar

16. Di Bonaventura G, Piccolomini R, Paludi D, D’Orio V. Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. J Appl M i c r o b i o l 2 0 0 8 ; 1 0 4 : 1 5 5 2 - 6 1 . d o i : 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03688.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Simões LC, Simões M, Oliveira R, Vieira MJ. Potential of the adhesion of bacteria isolated from drinking water to materials. J Basic Microbiol 2007;47:174-83. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200610224Search in Google Scholar

18. Liu Y, Tay JH. Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture. J Appl Microbiol 2001;90:337-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01244.xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short term fluctuations in flow velocity: an in-situ demonstration of biofilm viscoelasticity. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999;65:83-92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19991005)65:1<83::AIDBIT10>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar

20. Joseph C, Lee J, van Wijngaarden J, Drasar V, Castellani-Pastoris M. European Guidelines for the control and prevention of travel associated legionnaires’ disease (Draft). EWGLI - EC DG Health and Consumer Protection. Junij 2001:1-66.Search in Google Scholar

21. Winn WC Jr. Legionnaires disease: historical perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev 1988;1:60-81. PMCID: PMC35803010.1128/CMR.1.1.603580303060246Search in Google Scholar

22. Brenner DJ, Feeley JC, Weaver RE. Family VIII Legionellaceae. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD); Williams and Wilkins; 1984. p. 210-36.Search in Google Scholar

23. ISO 11731:1998. Water quality - Detection and enumeration of Legionella.Search in Google Scholar

24. Lage OM, Bondoso J, Catita JAM. Determinationof zeta potential in Planctomycetes and its application in heavy metal toxicity assessment. Arch Microbiol 2012;194:847-55. doi: 10.1007/s00203-012-0818-xSearch in Google Scholar

25. Heimenz PC, Rajagopalan R. Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry. 3rd edition. New York (NY): CRC Press; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

26. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Fink R, Oder M, Jevšnik M, Nipič D, Godič Torkar K, Raspor P. Available surface dictates microbial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;50:65-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.027Search in Google Scholar

27. Van Loosdrecht M, Norde W, Zehnder A. Physical chemical description of bacterial adhesion. J Biomater Appl 1990;5: 91-106 10.1177/08853282900050020210.1177/0885328290005002022266489Search in Google Scholar

28. Kochkodan V, Tsarenko S, Potapchenko N, Kosinova V, Goncharuk V. Adhesion of microorganisms to polymer membranes: a photobactericidal effect of surface treatment with TiO2. Desalination 2008;220:380-385. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.042Search in Google Scholar

29. Giaouris E, Chapot-Chartier M, Briandet R. Surface physicochemical analysis of natural Lactococcus lactis strains reveals the existence of hydrophobic and low charged strains with altered adhesive properties. Int J Food Microbiol 2009;131:2-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.006Search in Google Scholar

30. Kurinčič M, Jeršek B, Klančnik A, Smole Možina S, Fink R, Dražić G, Raspor P, Bohinc K. Effects of natural antimicrobials on bacterial cell hydrophobicity, adhesion, and zeta potential. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2016;67:37-43. doi: 10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2720Search in Google Scholar

31. Fink R, Oder M, Rangus D, Raspor P, Bohinc K. Microbial adhesion capacity. Influence of shear and temperature stress. Int J Environ Health Res 2014;25:656-69. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2015.1007840Search in Google Scholar

32. Rosenberg M, Kjelleberg S. Hydrophobic interactions in bacterial adhesion. In: Marshal KC, editor. Advances in microbial ecology. 1st ed. New York (NY): Springer Science Busines Media; 1986. p. 353-93.10.1007/978-1-4757-0611-6_8Search in Google Scholar

33. Corpe W. Microbial surface components involved in adsorption of microorganisms onto surfaces. In: Bitton G, Marshall KC, editors. Adsorption of microorganisms to surfaces. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1980. p. 105-44.Search in Google Scholar

34. Teodósio JS, Simões M, Melo LF, Mergulhão FJ. Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E.coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow. Biofouling 2011;27:1-11. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.535206Search in Google Scholar

35. Liu Y, Li J. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in the initial adhesion, growth and detachment of Escherichia coli in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:443-9. doi: 10.1021/es071861bSearch in Google Scholar

36. Bakker DP, van der Mats A, Verkerke GJ, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Comparison of velocity profiles for different flow chamber designs used in studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:6280-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6280-6287.2003Search in Google Scholar

37. Choi YC, Morgenroth E. Monitoring biofilm detachment under dynamic changes in shear stress using laser-based particle size analysis and mass fractionation. Water Sci Technol 2003;47:69-76. PMID: 1270190910.2166/wst.2003.0284Search in Google Scholar