[1. Heng BH, Goh KT, Ng DL, Ling AE. Surveillance of legionellosis and Legionella bacteria in the built environment in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;6:557-65. PMID: 9494658]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Den Boer JW, Yzerman EPF, Schellekens J, Lettinga KD, Boshuizen, HC, Van Steenbergen JE, Bosman A, Van den Hof S, Van Vliet HA, Peeters MF, Van Ketel RJ, Speelman P, Kool JL, Van Spaendonck MAEC. A large outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease at a flower show, the Netherlands, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:37-43. PMCID: PMC2730281]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Greig JE, Carnie JA, Tallis GF, Ryan NJ, Tan AG, Gordon IR, Zwolak B, Leydon JA, Guest CS, Hart WG. An outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease at the Melbourne Aquarium, April 2000: investigation and case-control studies. Med J Australia 2004; 180: 566-72. PMID: 1517498710.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06093.x15174987]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fliermans CB, Cherry WB, Orrison LH, Smith SJ, Tison DL, Pope SH. Ecological distribution of Legionella pneumophila. Appl Environ Microbiol 1981;41:9-16. PMCID: PMC24363310.1128/aem.41.1.9-16.19812436337013702]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Surman-Lee S, Fields B, Hornei B, Ewig S, Exner M, Tartakovsky I, Lajoie L, Dangendorf F, Bentham R, Cabanes PA, Fourrier P, Trouvet T, Wallet F. Ecology and environmental sources of Legionella. In: Bartram J, Chartier Y, Lee JV, Pond K, Surman-Lee S, editors. Legionella and the prevention of legionellosis. 1st ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2007. p. 29-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Rendueles O, Ghigo JM. Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012;36:972-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00328.x]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284:1318-22. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001;358:135-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Coquet L, Cosette P, Junter GA, Beucher E, Saiter JM, Jouenne T. Adhesion of Yersinia ruckeri to fish farm materials: influence of cell and material surface properties. Colloids Surf B 2002;26:373-8. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00023-1]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Teixeira P, Silva S, Araújo F, Azeredo J, Oliveira R. Bacterial adhesion to food contacting surfaces. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Communicating current research and educational topics and trends in applied microbiology. Vol. 1. Formatex, 2007. p. 13-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Rogers J, Dowsett AB, Dennis PJ, Lee JV, Keevil CW. Influence of plumbing materials on biofilm formation and growth of Legionella pneumophila in potable water systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994;60:1842-51. PMCID: PMC20157110.1128/aem.60.6.1842-1851.199420157116349278]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Türetgen I, Cotuk A. Monitoring of biofilm-associated Legionella pneumophila on different substrata in model cooling tower system. Environ Monit Assess 2007;125:271-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9519-8]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Moritz MM, Flemming H, Wingender J. Integration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella pneumophila in drinking water biofilms grown on domestic plumbing materials. Int J Hyg Environ Heal 2010;213:190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Vickery K, Pajkos A, Cossart Y. Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: Evaluation of detergent efficiency. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.009]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cells Mater 2004;8:37-57. PMID: 1559301810.22203/eCM.v008a05]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Di Bonaventura G, Piccolomini R, Paludi D, D’Orio V. Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. J Appl M i c r o b i o l 2 0 0 8 ; 1 0 4 : 1 5 5 2 - 6 1 . d o i : 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03688.x]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Simões LC, Simões M, Oliveira R, Vieira MJ. Potential of the adhesion of bacteria isolated from drinking water to materials. J Basic Microbiol 2007;47:174-83. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200610224]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Liu Y, Tay JH. Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture. J Appl Microbiol 2001;90:337-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01244.x]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short term fluctuations in flow velocity: an in-situ demonstration of biofilm viscoelasticity. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999;65:83-92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19991005)65:1<83::AIDBIT10>3.0.CO;2-B]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Joseph C, Lee J, van Wijngaarden J, Drasar V, Castellani-Pastoris M. European Guidelines for the control and prevention of travel associated legionnaires’ disease (Draft). EWGLI - EC DG Health and Consumer Protection. Junij 2001:1-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Winn WC Jr. Legionnaires disease: historical perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev 1988;1:60-81. PMCID: PMC35803010.1128/CMR.1.1.603580303060246]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Brenner DJ, Feeley JC, Weaver RE. Family VIII Legionellaceae. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD); Williams and Wilkins; 1984. p. 210-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. ISO 11731:1998. Water quality - Detection and enumeration of Legionella.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Lage OM, Bondoso J, Catita JAM. Determinationof zeta potential in Planctomycetes and its application in heavy metal toxicity assessment. Arch Microbiol 2012;194:847-55. doi: 10.1007/s00203-012-0818-x]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Heimenz PC, Rajagopalan R. Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry. 3rd edition. New York (NY): CRC Press; 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Fink R, Oder M, Jevšnik M, Nipič D, Godič Torkar K, Raspor P. Available surface dictates microbial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;50:65-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.027]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Van Loosdrecht M, Norde W, Zehnder A. Physical chemical description of bacterial adhesion. J Biomater Appl 1990;5: 91-106 10.1177/08853282900050020210.1177/0885328290005002022266489]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Kochkodan V, Tsarenko S, Potapchenko N, Kosinova V, Goncharuk V. Adhesion of microorganisms to polymer membranes: a photobactericidal effect of surface treatment with TiO2. Desalination 2008;220:380-385. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.042]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Giaouris E, Chapot-Chartier M, Briandet R. Surface physicochemical analysis of natural Lactococcus lactis strains reveals the existence of hydrophobic and low charged strains with altered adhesive properties. Int J Food Microbiol 2009;131:2-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Kurinčič M, Jeršek B, Klančnik A, Smole Možina S, Fink R, Dražić G, Raspor P, Bohinc K. Effects of natural antimicrobials on bacterial cell hydrophobicity, adhesion, and zeta potential. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2016;67:37-43. doi: 10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2720]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Fink R, Oder M, Rangus D, Raspor P, Bohinc K. Microbial adhesion capacity. Influence of shear and temperature stress. Int J Environ Health Res 2014;25:656-69. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2015.1007840]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Rosenberg M, Kjelleberg S. Hydrophobic interactions in bacterial adhesion. In: Marshal KC, editor. Advances in microbial ecology. 1st ed. New York (NY): Springer Science Busines Media; 1986. p. 353-93.10.1007/978-1-4757-0611-6_8]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Corpe W. Microbial surface components involved in adsorption of microorganisms onto surfaces. In: Bitton G, Marshall KC, editors. Adsorption of microorganisms to surfaces. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1980. p. 105-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Teodósio JS, Simões M, Melo LF, Mergulhão FJ. Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E.coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow. Biofouling 2011;27:1-11. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.535206]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Liu Y, Li J. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in the initial adhesion, growth and detachment of Escherichia coli in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:443-9. doi: 10.1021/es071861b]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Bakker DP, van der Mats A, Verkerke GJ, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Comparison of velocity profiles for different flow chamber designs used in studies of microbial adhesion to surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:6280-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6280-6287.2003]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Choi YC, Morgenroth E. Monitoring biofilm detachment under dynamic changes in shear stress using laser-based particle size analysis and mass fractionation. Water Sci Technol 2003;47:69-76. PMID: 1270190910.2166/wst.2003.0284]Search in Google Scholar