Key factors contributing to accident severity rate in construction industry in Iran: a regression modelling approach / Primjena regresijskog modela u analizi ključnih čimbenika koji pridonose težini nesreća u građevinskoj industriji u Iranu

Open access

Abstract

Construction industry involves the highest risk of occupational accidents and bodily injuries, which range from mild to very severe. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify the factors associated with accident severity rate (ASR) in the largest Iranian construction companies based on data about 500 occupational accidents recorded from 2009 to 2013. We also gathered data on safety and health risk management and training systems. Data were analysed using Pearson’s chi-squared coefficient and multiple regression analysis. Median ASR (and the interquartile range) was 107.50 (57.24- 381.25). Fourteen of the 24 studied factors stood out as most affecting construction accident severity (p<0.05). These findings can be applied in the design and implementation of a comprehensive safety and health risk management system to reduce ASR.

1. Im HJ, Kwon YJ, Kim SG, Kim YK, Ju YS, Lee HP. The characteristics of fatal occupational injuries in Korea’s construction industry, 1997-2004. Safety Sci 2009;47:1159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.008

2. Soltanzadeh AI. Mohammadfam I, Moghim Beygi A, Akbarzadeh M. Studying disabling occupational accidents in the construction industry during two years. J Occup Hyg Eng 2014;1:57-66.

3. Pellicer E, Carvajal GI, Rubio MC, CataláJ. A method to estimate occupational health and safety costs in construction projects. KSCE J Civil Eng 2014;18:1955-65. doi: 10.1007/ s12205-014-0591-2

4. Häkkinen K, Niemelä V. Accident Sources and Prevention in the Construction Industry-Some Recent Developments in Finland. InIntegrated Occupational Safety and Health Management 2015 (pp. 17-24). Springer International Publishing.

5. Cameron I, Hare B, Davies R. Fatal and major construction accidents: A comparison between Scotland and the rest of Great Britain. Safety Sci 2008;46:692-708. doi: 10.1016/j. ssci.2007.06.007

6. Cheng C-W, Leu S-S, Lin C-C, Fan C. Characteristic analysis of occupational accidents at small construction enterprises. Safety Sci 2010;48:698-707. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.001

7. Pinto A, Nunes IL, Ribeiro RA. Occupational risk assessment in construction industry - Overview and reflection. Safety Sci 2011;49:616-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.003

8. Grant A, Hinze J. Construction worker fatalities related to trusses: An analysis of the OSHA fatality and catastrophic incident database. Safety Sci 2014;65:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j. ssci.2013.12.016

9. Suraji A, Duff AR, Peckitt SJ. Development of causal model of construction accident causation. Journal of construction engineering and management. 2001 Aug;127(4):337-44.

10. Haslam R, Hide SA, Gibb AG, Gyi DE, Pavitt T, Atkinson S, Duff AR. Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl Ergon 2005;36:401-15. doi: 10.1016/j . apergo.2004.12.002

11. del Cano A. de la Cruz MP. Integrated methodology for project risk management. J Constr Eng Manage 2002;128:473-85. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:6(473)

12. Mills A. A systematic approach to risk management for construction. Structural Survey 2001;19:245-52. doi: 10.1108/02630800110412615

13. Mohamadfam I, Soleimani E, Ghasemi F, Zamanparvar A.Comparison of management oversight and risk tree and tripod-beta in excavation accident analysis. Jundishapur J Health Sci 2015;7(1):e23554. doi: 10.5812/jjhs.23554

14. Moradinazar M, Kurd N, Farhadi R, Amee V, Najafi F. Epidemiology of work-related injuries among construction workers of Ilam (Western Iran) during 2006-2009. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013;15(10):e8011. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.8011

15. Cheng C-W, Applying data mining techniques to explore factors contributing to occupational injuries in Taiwan’s construction industry. Accid Anal Prev 2012;48:214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.014

16. Cho K-M, Hong T-H, Hyun CT. Effect of project characteristics on project performance in construction projects based on structural equation model. Exp Syst Appl 2009;36:10461-70. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.032

17. Sari M, Sevtap Selçuk A, Karpuz C. Stochastic modeling of accident risks associated with an underground coal mine in Turkey. Safety Sci 2009;47:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j. ssci.2007.12.004

18. Biesiada J. Duch W. Feature selection for high-dimensional data: a pearson redundancy based filter. In: Kurzynski M, editor. Computer recognition systems 2. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 242-9.

19. Abdelhamid TS, Everett JG. Identifying root causes of construction accidents. J Constr Eng Manage 2000;126:52-60. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(52)

20. Mitropoulos P, Abdelhamid TS, Howell GA. Systems model of construction accident causation. J Constr Eng Manage 2005;131:816-25. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(816)

21. Fam IM, Nikoomaram H, Soltanian A. Comparative analysis of creative and classic training methods in health, safety and environment (HSE) participation improvement. J Loss Prevent Proc Ind 2012;25:250-3. doi: 10.1016/j. jlp.2011.11.003

22. Zhang RP, Li RYM. A Conceptual study of construction workers’ safety performance from safety climate and social exchange perspectives. In: Li R, Li M, editors. Construction safety and waste management. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG; 2015. p. 123-37.

23. Ghasemi F, Mohammadfam I, Soltanian AR, Mahmoudi S, Zarei E. Surprising incentive: an instrument for promoting safety performance of construction employees. Safety Health Work 2015;6:227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.02.006

Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology

The Journal of Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.117
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.335



CiteScore 2017: 1.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.341
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.494

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 180 180 26
PDF Downloads 76 76 12