Cite

1. Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D. Biocompatibility of dental materials: Springer Verlang Berlin Heidelberg; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bogović A, Nižetić J, Galić N, Želježić D, Micek V, Mladinić M. The effects of hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxide, and dentin adhesive on rat odontoblasts and fibroblasts. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2011;62:155-61. PMID:21705303.10.2478/10004-1254-62-2011-2076Search in Google Scholar

3. Tadin A, Galic N, Zeljezic D, Mikelic Vitasovic B, Marovic D, Kovacic I. Ex vivo evaluation of genotoxic effects of four dental adhesives on human leukocytes. J Dent Sci 2013;8:37-43. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.12.001.10.1016/j.jds.2012.12.001Search in Google Scholar

4. Tadin A, Galic N, Mladinic M, Marovic D, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D. Genotoxicity in gingival cells of patients undergoing tooth restoration with two different dental composite materials. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:87-96. PMID: 23385426.10.1007/s00784-013-0933-3Search in Google Scholar

5. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14(Suppl):10-3. PMID:19089080.10.1590/S1678-77572006000700003Search in Google Scholar

6. Berzins DW, Abey S, Costache MC, Wilkie CA, Roberts HW. Resin-modified glass-ionomer setting reaction competition. J Dent Res 2010;89:82-6. PMID:19966038.10.1177/0022034509355919Search in Google Scholar

7. Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Fukuda R, Snauwaert J, Nakayama Y, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glassionomer/ tooth interfaces. J Dent Res 2007;86(7):656-61. PMID:17586714.10.1177/154405910708600714Search in Google Scholar

8. Aranha AM, Giro EM, Souza PP, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA. Effect of curing regime on the cytotoxicity of resinmodified glass-ionomer lining cements applied to an odontoblast-cell line. Dent Mater 2006;22:864-9. PMID:16388848.10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.015Search in Google Scholar

9. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16:129-38. PMID:1120353410.1016/S0109-5641(99)00093-7Search in Google Scholar

10. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hanks CT. 2003. In vitro cytotoxicity of five glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 2003;24:3853-8. PMID:12818558.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00253-9Search in Google Scholar

11. Souza PP, Aranha AM, Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of contemporary resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:838-44. PMID:16387357.10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.00216387357Search in Google Scholar

12. Stanislawski L, Daniau X, Lauti A, Goldberg M. Factors responsible for pulp cell cytotoxicity induced by resinmodified glass ionomer cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:277-88. PMID:10398031.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:3<277::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-TSearch in Google Scholar

13. Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000;11:333-55. PMID:11021634.10.1177/10454411000110030401Search in Google Scholar

14. Koulaouzidou EA, Papazisis KT, Economides NA, Beltes P, Kortsaris AH. Antiproliferative effect of mineral trioxide aggregate, zinc oxide-eugenol cement, and glass-ionomer cement against three fibroblastic cell lines. J Endod 2005;31:44-6. PMID:15614005.10.1097/01.DON.0000132302.03725.50Search in Google Scholar

15. do Nascimento AB, Fontana UF, Teixeira HM, Costa CA. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth. Am J Dent 2000;13:28-34. PMID:11763899.Search in Google Scholar

16. Six N, Lasfargues JJ, Goldberg M. In vivo study of the pulp reaction to Fuji IX, a glass ionomer cement. J Dent 2000;28:413-22. PMID:10856806.10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00015-4Search in Google Scholar

17. ISO standard 10993/12. Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part 12: sample preparation and reference material. ed. G ISO: Geneva;1996. [Displayed 23 February 2013]. Available at https://law.resource.org/pub/ie/ibr/is.en.iso.10993.12.2012.html.Search in Google Scholar

18. Fenech M. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations. Environ Health Perspect 1993;101(Suppl) 3:101-7. PMID: 8143599.10.1289/ehp.93101s3101Search in Google Scholar

19. Fenech M, Chang WP, Kirsch-Volders M, Holland N, Bonassi S, Zeiger E; HUman MicronNucleus project. HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesisblock micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. Mutat Res. 2003 Jan 10;534(1-2):65-75. PMID: 12504755.10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00249-8Search in Google Scholar

20. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988;175:184-91. PMID:3345800.10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0Search in Google Scholar

21. Smith CC, O’Donovan MR, Martin EA. hOGG1 recognizes oxidative damage using the comet assay with greater specificity than FPG or ENDOIII. Mutagenesis 2006;21:185-90. PMID:16597659.10.1093/mutage/gel019Search in Google Scholar

22. Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Molr biotechnol 2004;26:249-61. PMID:1500429410.1385/MB:26:3:249Search in Google Scholar

23. Kawahara T, Nomura Y, Tanaka N, Teshima W, Okazaki M, Shintani H. Leachability of plasticizer and residual monomer from commercial temporary restorative resins. J Dent 2004;32:277-83. PMID:15053910.10.1016/j.jdent.2003.12.004Search in Google Scholar

24. Dufour EK, Kumaravel T, Nohynek GJ, Kirkland D, Toutain H. Clastogenicity, photo-clastogenicity or pseudo-photoclastogenicity: Genotoxic effects of zinc oxide in the dark, in pre-irradiated or simultaneously irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutat Res 2006;607:215-24. PMID: 16797222.10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.015Search in Google Scholar

25. Kleinsasser NH, Wallner BC, Harréus UA, Kleinjung T, Folwaczny M, Hickel R, Kehe K, Reichl FX. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of dental materials in human lymphocytes as assessed by the single cell microgel electrophoresis (comet) assay. J Dent 2004;32:229-34. PMID:15001288.10.1016/j.jdent.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar

26. Leyhausen G, Abtahi M, Karbakhsch M, Sapotnick A, Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of various light-curing and one conventional glass-ionomer cement. Biomaterials 1998;19:559-64. PMID: 9645563.10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00137-3Search in Google Scholar

27. Ribeiro DA, Marques ME, Salvadori DM. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:495-500. PMID: 16691346.10.1007/s10856-006-8931-5Search in Google Scholar

28. Bakopoulou A, Mourelatos D, Tsiftsoglou AS, Giassin NP, Mioglou E, Garefis P. Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of different types of dental cement on normal cultured human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 2009;672:103-12. PMID:19028600.10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.10.011Search in Google Scholar

29. Stea S, Visentin M, Cervellati M, Verri E, Cenni E, Savarino L, Stea S, Pizzoferrato A. 1998. In vitro sister chromatid exchange induced by glass ionomer cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:545-50. PMID:9599030. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<545::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-FSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
0004-1254
Languages:
English, Slovenian
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other