Grapevine Trunk Diseases Associated with Fungi from the Diaporthaceae Family in Croatian Vineyards / Identifikacija Vrsta Roda Fusarium Izoliranih S Plodova Jabuke Nakon Skladištenja

1. Cvjetković B. Mikoze i pseudomikoze voćaka i vinove loze [Mycoses and Pseudomycoses of Fruit Trees and Grapevine, in Croatian]. Čakovec: Zrinski; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gubler WD, Rolshausen PE, Trouillas FP, Urbez-Torres JR, Voege T, Leavitt GM, Weber EA. Grapevine trunk diseases in California. Practical Winery and Vineyard 2005 [displayed 24 September 2012]. Avaliable at http://www.practicalwinery. com/janfeb05/janfeb05p6.htmSearch in Google Scholar

3. Armengol J, Vicent A, Torne L, Garcia-Figueres F, Garcia- Jimenez J. Fungi associated with esca and grapevine decline in Spain: a three-year survey. Phytopathol Mediterr 2001;40:325-9.Search in Google Scholar

4. Urbez-Torres JR, Adams P, Kamas J, Gubler DW. Identification, incidence, and pathogenicity of fungal species associated with grapevine dieback in Texas. Am J Enol Vitic 2009;60:497-507.10.5344/ajev.2009.60.4.497Search in Google Scholar

5. Aroca A, Garcia-Figueres F, Bracamonte L, Luque J, Raposo R. A survey of trunk disease pathogens within rootstocks of grapevines in Spain. Eur J Plant Pathol 2006;115:195-202.10.1007/s10658-006-9008-5Search in Google Scholar

6. White CL, Halleen F, Fischer M, Mostert L. Characterisation of the fungi associated with esca diseased grapevines in South Africa. Phytopathol Mediterr 2011;50:204-3.Search in Google Scholar

7. Navarrete F, Abreo E, Betucci L, Martinez S, Lupo S. First report of Greeneria uvicola as a cause of grapevine dead-arm dieback in Uruguay. Australas Plant Dis Notes 2009;4:117-9.Search in Google Scholar

8. Jordan S, Schilder A. Eutypella vitis, a potential pathogen of grapevines in Michigan. Phytopathology 2005;95:S51.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mostert L, Halleen F, Crous PW, Creaser mL. Cryptovalsaampelina, a forgotten shoot and cane pathogen of grapevines. Australas Plant Pathol 2004;33:295-9.10.1071/AP03095Search in Google Scholar

10. Mostert L, Crous PW, Petrini O. Endophytic fungi associated with shoots and leaves of Vitis vinifera, with specific reference to the Phomopsis viticola complex. Sydowia 2000;52:46-58.Search in Google Scholar

11. Mostert L, Crous PW, Kang JC, Phillips AJL. Species of Phomopsis and a Libertella sp. occurring on grapevines with specific reference to South Africa: morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterization. Mycologia 2001;93:146-67.10.2307/3761612Search in Google Scholar

12. Merrin SJ, Nair NG, Tarran J. Variation in Phomopsis recorded on grapevine in Australia and its taxonomic and biological implications. Australas Plant Pathol 1995;24:44-56.10.1071/APP9950044Search in Google Scholar

13. Phillips AJL. The relationship between Diaporthe perjuncta and Phomopsis viticola on grapevines. Mycologia 1999;91:1001-7.10.2307/3761631Search in Google Scholar

14. Phillips AJL. Excoriose, cane blight and related diseases of grapevines: a taxonomic review of the pathogens. Phytopathol Mediterr 2000;39:341-56.Search in Google Scholar

15. Niekerk JM, Groenewald JZ, Farr DF, Fourie PH, Halleen F, Crous PW. Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevines. Australas Plant Path 2005;34:1-13.Search in Google Scholar

16. Schilder AMC, Erincik O, Castlebury L, Rossman A, Ellis MA. Characterization of Phomopsis spp. infecting grapevines in the Great Lakes region of North America. Plant Dis 2005;89:755-62.10.1094/PD-89-075530791247Search in Google Scholar

17. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th ed. Wallingford (UK): CABI Publishing; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

18. Uecker FA. A World List of Phomopsis Names With Notes on Nomenclature, Morphology and Biology (Mycologia Memoir). Port Jervis (NY): Lubrecht & Cramer Ltd; 1988.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rossman AY, Farr DF, Castlebury LA. A review of the phylogeny and biology of the Diaporthales. Mycoscience 2007;48:135-44.10.1007/S10267-007-0347-7Search in Google Scholar

20. Dhanushka U, Xingzhong L, McKenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Bahkali AHA, Hyde KD. The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens. Fungal Divers 2011;50:189-225.10.1007/s13225-011-0126-9Search in Google Scholar

21. Kaliterna J, Miličević T, Cvjetković B. Nove spoznaje o etiologiji crne pjegavosti vinove loze i taksonomiji vrsta povezanih s patogenom Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc. [New Insight into Aetiology of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot of Grapevine and Taxonomy of Species Related to Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc., in Croatian]. Glasilo biljne zaštite 2009;5:291-5.Search in Google Scholar

22. Kišpatić J. Crna pjegavost vinove loze - Phomopsis viticola Sacc. „nova” bolest u našim vinogradima [Black Spot of Grapevine - Phomopsis viticola Sacc. a “New” Disease in Croatian Vineyards, in Croatian]. Bilten „Poljodobra” 1973; (separat):1-11.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kišpatić J, Seiwerth V, Glavaš M. Raširenje Phomopsisviticola Sacc. u našim vinogradima [Occurrence of Phomopsisviticola Sacc. in Croatian Vineyards, in Croatian]. Poljoprivredna znanstvena smotra 1976;39/49:309-412.Search in Google Scholar

24. Cvjetković B, Miličević T, Ivić D. Crna pjegavost vinove loze (Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc.) česta bolest naših vinograda [Black Spot of Grapevine (Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc. frequent disease in Croatian Vineyards, in Croatian]. Glasilo biljne zaštite 2009;5:287-90.Search in Google Scholar

25. Scheper RWA, Crane DC, Whisson DL, Scott ES. The Diaporthe teleomorph of Phomopsis Taxon 1 on grapevine. Mycol Res 2000;104:226-31.10.1017/S095375629900115XSearch in Google Scholar

26. Rawnsley B, Wicks TJ, Scott ES, Stummer BE. Diaportheperjuncta does not cause Phomopsis cane and leaf spot disease of grapevine in Australia. Plant Dis 2004;88:1005-10.10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.9.100530812213Search in Google Scholar

27. Vrandečić K, Jurković D, Ćosić J. Phomopsis vrste na vinovoj lozi u istočnoj Hrvatskoj [Phomopsis Species on Grapevine in Eastern Croatia, in Croatian]. Glasilo biljne zaštite 2010;4:246-52.Search in Google Scholar

28. Santos JM, Phillips AJL. Resolving the complex of Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species occurring on Foeniculum vulgare in Portugal. Fungal Divers 2009;34:111-25.Search in Google Scholar

29. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. New York (NY): Academic Press;1990. p. 315-22.10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1Search in Google Scholar

30. Urbez-Torres JR. Leavitt GM. Guerrero JC. Guevara J. Gubler WD. Identification and pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodiatheobromae and Diplodia seriata, the causal agents of bot canker disease of grapevines in Mexico. Plant Dis 2008;92:519-29.10.1094/PDIS-92-4-051930769642Search in Google Scholar

31. Urbez-Torres JR. Gubler, WD. Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species isolated from grapevine cankers in California. Plant Dis 2009;93:584-92.10.1094/PDIS-93-6-058430764399Search in Google Scholar

32. Phillips AJL. Botryosphaeria species associated with diseases of grapevines in Portugal. Phytopathol Mediterr 2002;41:3-18.Search in Google Scholar

33. Taylor A, Hardy GEStJ, Wood P, Burgess T. Identification and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species associated with grapevine decline in Western Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 2005;34:187-95.10.1071/AP05018Search in Google Scholar

34. Thomidis T, Michailides TJ. Studies on Diaporthe eres as a new pathogen of peach trees in Greece. Plant Dis 2009;93:1293-7.10.1094/PDIS-93-12-129330759511Search in Google Scholar

35. Vrandečić K, Jurković D, Ćosić J, Postić J, Riccioni L. First report of cane blight on blackberry caused by Diaporthe eres in Croatia. Plant Dis 2011;95:612.10.1094/PDIS-11-10-086030731950Search in Google Scholar

36. Anagnostakis SL. Diaporthe eres (Phomopsis oblonga) as a pathogen of butternut (Juglans cinerea) in Connecticut. Plant Dis 2007;91:1198.10.1094/PDIS-91-9-1198C30780664Search in Google Scholar

37. Curzi M. De novis theae micromycetibus pathogenis. Atti Ist Bot Univ Pavia 1927;3:59-72.Search in Google Scholar

38. Diogo ELF, Santos JM, Phillips AJL. Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. Fungal Divers 2010;44:107-15.10.1007/s13225-010-0057-xSearch in Google Scholar

39. Uecker FA, Kuo KC. A new Phomopsis with long paraphyses. Mycotaxon 1992;64:425-33.Search in Google Scholar

40. Kuo K, Leu LS. Phomopsis vitimegaspora: a pathogenic Phomopsis from vines. Mycotaxon 1998;66:497-99.Search in Google Scholar

41. Vrandečić K. Morfološka i molekularna identifikacija Diaporthe/Phomopsis vrsta s kultiviranog i korovskog bilja [Morphological and molecular identification of Diaporthe/ Phomopsis species from cultivated and weed plants] [dissertation]. Osijek (Croatia); Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek; 2008 Search in Google Scholar