Romanian in Vitro Bryophyte Collection and its Role for Conservation

Open access


The in vitro bryophyte collection of the Institute of Biology Bucharest represents the first initiative at national level for bryophyte ex-situ conservation using biotechnological techniques. Micro-propagation and medium-term storage protocols have been developed for 25 bryophyte species of both liverworts and mosses. The collection serves for conservation as well as for research and biotechnological purposes.


  • Anonymous (2002). Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, COP VI/9. Retrieved March, 2014, from:

  • Anonymous (2008). The European Strategy for Plant Conservation 2008-2014. Retrieved March, 2014, from:

  • Anonymous (2011). IUCN STANDARDS AND PETITIONS SUBCOMMITTEE: Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 9.0. Retrieved March, 2014, from:

  • Banerjee, R.D. (1974). Studies on antibiotic activity of bryophytes and pteridophytes. Ph.D. thesis. University of Kaliany. Kaliany, India.

  • Brezeanu, A., Cogălniceanu, G. & Stoiculescu R. (2008). Ultrastructural characterization of the in vitro gametophyte of Bucegia romanica Radian - a rare liverwort. Rom. J. Biol.- Plant Biol., 53(2), 49-61.

  • Brezeanu, A., Cogălniceanu, G.& Mihai, R. (2009). Studying cell biology of bryophytes. Biotechnol. Biotech. Eq., 23, 467-468, Special Edition/on-line.

  • Chapin III, F.S., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., Naylor, R.L., Vitousek, P.M., Reynolds, H.L., Hooper, D.U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O.E., Hobbie, S.E., Mack, M.C. & Diaz, S. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234-242.

  • Ciocârlan, V. (2009). Flora ilustrată a României. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres. 1149 pp.

  • Cogălniceanu, D. & Cogălniceanu, G. (2010). An enlarged European Union challenges priority settings in conservation. Biodivers. Conserv., 19(5), 1471-1483.

  • Cogălniceanu, G. & Stoiculescu, R. (2007). Particularităţi privind culturile in vitro la briofite. In D. Cachiţă-Cosma (ed.). Micropropagarea Speciilor Vegetale, Lucrările celui de-al XV-lea Simpozion Naţional de Culturi de Ţesuturi şi Celule Vegetale, Iaşi. 2006. Cluj-Napoca: Edit. Risoprint.

  • Cogălniceanu, G., Stoiculescu, R.& Ştefănuţ, S. (2006). Conservarea in vitro la briofite. In D. Cachiţă-Cosma & C.Sand (eds.). Conservarea vitroculturilor vegetale. Lucrările celui de-al XIV-lea Simpozion Naţional de Culturi de Ţesuturi şi Celule Vegetale. Sibiu. 2005. Sibiu: Edit. Alma Mater.

  • Crum, H. (2001). Structural Diversity in Bryophytes. University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann. Arbor.

  • Duckett, J.G., Burch, J., Fletcher, P.W., Matcham, H.W., Read, D.J., Russell, A.J. & Pressel S. (2004). In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: a review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. J. Bryol., 26, 3-20.

  • Gamborg, O.L., Miller, R.A. & Ojima, K. (1968). Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151-158.

  • Glime, J.M. (2007). Bryophyte ecology. Retrieved March, 2014, from: Gradstein, S.R., Churchill, S.P. & Salazar, A.N. (2001). Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard., 86, 1-577.

  • Hallingbäck, T. & Hodgetts, N. (compilers) (2000). Mosses, Liverworts, and Hornworts. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Bryophytes. IUCN/SSC Bryophyte Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

  • Hodgetts, N. 1996. Threatened bryophytes in Europe. Anales Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. Autón. México, Ser. Bot., 67(1), 183-200.

  • Hu, R. (1987). Bryology. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

  • Knop, W. (1865). Quantitative Untersuchungen über die Ernahrungsprozesse der Pflanzen. Landwirtsch. Vers. Stn. ,7, 93-107.

  • Leemans, R. & Eickhout, B. (2004). Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change. Global Environ. Chang., 14, 219-228.

  • Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plantarum., 15, 473-497.

  • Oliver, M.J., Veltren, J., Mishler, B.D. (2005). Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: a reflection of the primitive strategy for plant survival in dehydrating habitats?. Integr. Comp. Biol., 45(5), 788-799.

  • Proctor, M.C.F. (2000). The bryophyte paradox: tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought. Plant Ecol., 151, 41-49.

  • Rojanschi, V., Ştefănescu, R., Pop, D.A. & Săvulescu, A.R. (2011). Strategie naţională şi Plan de acţiune privind conservarea biodiversităţii în România pentru decada 2011-2020. Bucureşti: Tipografia Digital Advertising. 207 pp.

  • Ştefănuţ, S. & Goia, I. (2012). Checklist and Red List of Bryophytes of Romania. Nova Hedwigia, 95(1-2), 59-104.

  • University of Michigan, Dearborn. (2003). Native American Etnobotany, A database of foods, drugs, dyes and fibres of native American peoples, derived from plants. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from

  • Vanderpoorten, A. & Goffinet, B. (2009). Introduction to bryophytes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 328 pp.

  • Vujičić, M., Cvetić, T., Sabovljević, A. & Sabovljević, M. (2010). Axenically culturing the Bryophytes: a case study of the liverworth Marchantia polymorpha L. ssp. ruderalis Bischl. & Boisselier (Marchantiophyta, Marchantiaceae). Kragujevac J.

  • Sci., 32, 73-81.

Acta Horti Botanici Bucurestiensis

The Journal of University of Bucharest

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 17 17 17
PDF Downloads 4 4 4