Assessment of cassava supply response in Nigeria using vector error correction model (VECM)

Open access

Abstract

The response of agricultural commodities to changes in price is an important factor in the success of any reform programme in agricultural sector of Nigeria. The producers of traditional agricultural commodities, such as cassava, face the world market directly. Consequently, the producer price of cassava has become unstable, which is a disincentive for both its production and trade. This study investigated cassava supply response to changes in price. Data collected from FAOSTAT from 1966 to 2010 were analysed using Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) approach. The results of the VECM for the estimation of short run adjustment of the variables toward their long run relationship showed a linear deterministic trend in the data and that Area cultivated and own prices jointly explained 74% and 63% of the variation in the Nigeria cassava output in the short run and long-run respectively. Cassava prices (P<0.001) and land cultivated (P<0.1) had positive influence on cassava supply in the short-run. The short-run price elasticity was 0.38 indicating that price policies were effective in the short-run promotion of cassava production in Nigeria. However, in the long-run elasticity cassava was not responsive to price incentives significantly. This suggests that price policies are not effective in the long-run promotion of cassava production in the country owing to instability in governance and government policies.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Bello A. Nigeria Imported $US700 million rice in 2003: Federal Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development -Mallam Adamu Bello in Nigerian Tribune Newspaper. Monday 7th July [2004].

  • 2. Eke-Okoro CN. Optimum rate of new compound fertilizer for cassava production in south eastern Nigeria. Journal of Research in Agriculture 2004; 4 (1): 23-26.

  • 3. Food and Agricultural Organisation FAOSTAT statistical data base 2013. (http://faostat.fao.org).

  • 4. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD) (2004). Ministerial press briefing by Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development on the state of Nigerian Agriculture at Maizube Farms Niger State May 16 2004.

  • 5. Granger CWJ. Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1986; 48:213-228.

  • 6. Hallam D Zanoli R. Error correction models and agricultural supply response. Eur Rev Agric Econ 1992; 2:111-120.

  • 7. Johansen S Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration - with Applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1990; 52 169-210.

  • 8. McKay A Morrisey O Vaillant C. Aggregate supply response in Tanzanian agriculture. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 1999; 8(1): 107-23.

  • 9. Mesike CS Okoh RN Inoni OE. Supply response of rubber farmers in Nigeria: An application of Vector Error Correction Model. Agricultural Journal 2010; 5:146-150.

  • 10. Mythili G. Acreage and yield response for major crops in the pre-and post-reform periods in India: A dynamic panel data approach. PP Series 061 Indira Gandhi Institute of Development of Research Mumbai. 2008

  • 11. Nerlove M. The dynamics of supply: estimation of farmers’ response to price. Johns Hopkins Baltimore. 1-23. 1958.

  • 12. Obayelu AE Salau AS. Agricultural response to prices and exchange rate in Nigeria: Application of Co-integration and Vector Error Correction Model. J. Agri Sci. 2010; (2):73-81 (2010).

  • 13. Ogazi CG. Rice output supply response to the changes in real prices in Nigeria: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model Approach. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa 2009;11(4):83-100. Clarion University of Pennsylvania Clarion and Pennsylvania.

  • 14. Ogundari K Nanseki T. Maize supply response to prices in Nigeria: Application of ARDL and co-integration analyses. Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan. 2013.

  • 15. Ojiako IA Manyong VM Ikpi AE. Smallholder soybean farmers’ supply response in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Economics 2008;3(1-2): 4353.

  • 16. Onono PA Wawire NWH Ombuki C. The response of maize production in Kenya to economic incentives. International Journal of Development and Sustainability 2013; 2(2)P: 530-543.

  • 17. Ozkan B. Ceylan RF Kizilay H. Supply response for wheat in Turkey: a vector error correction approach. NEW MEDIT N. 3/2011

  • 18. Thiele R. Price incentives non-price factors and agricultural production in sub-Saharan Africa: A co-integration analysis. Paper presented at the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists Durban South Africa p 16. 16-22 August 2003.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 418 208 20
PDF Downloads 246 144 12