The Change in Spectrum of Drops in the Exploitation Process of Agricultural Nozzles

Alaa Kamel Subr, Józef Sawa 1 , and Stanisław Parafiniuk 1
  • 1 Department of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, University of Life Sciences in Lublin
  • 2 Department of Agricultural Machines and Equipment, College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Abstract

Agricultural nozzles usually produce a different drops size depending on the pressure and the physical condition (work life) of the nozzle besides producing a wide range of the drops spectrum in the spray cloud. In this paper the standard flat fan nozzles were investigated regarding the effect of the working pressure and the nozzle physical condition (new and worn nozzles). The size of drops and the spectrum of drops across the long axis of the spray pattern were examined by using Sympatec GmbH Laser Diffraction. Reducing the working pressure from 3 to 2 and then to 1 caused production of larger drops, also using worn nozzles (especially with lower pressure) changed the drops size which is expected to be produced from the new nozzles. The standard flat fan nozzles produced a wide range of the drops spectrum inside the spray cloud, generally small drops (less than 150 µm) concentrated in the middle of the spray pattern while the big drops (250-350µm) were situated on the edge positions (70 cm from the centerline) of the spray pattern.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ASAE S572. (2004). Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

  • ASAE S572.1. (2009). Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

  • Doble, S.J., Matthews G A, Rutherford I, Southcombe E S E. (1985). A system for classifying hydraulic nozzles and other atomisers into categories of spray quality.Proceedings for British Crop Protection Council Conference.1125-1133.

  • DuvnjakV., Banaj D., Zimmer R., Guberac V. (1998). Influence of nozzle wear on flow rate and stream droplets size. Die Bodenkultur, 49(3): 189-192.

  • ISO 10625. (2005). International Standard.Equipment for crop protection – Sprayer nozzles – Colour coding for identification. 2005. 4 p.

  • Klein R.N., Jeffrey A. Golus and Greg R. Kruger (2011). Evaluation of Soybean (Glycine max) Canopy Penetration with Several Nozzle Types and Pressures, Fungicides - Beneficial and Harmful Aspects, Dr. Nooruddin Thajuddin (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-451-1, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/27609. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/fungicides-beneficial-and-harmful-aspects/evaluation-of-soybean-glycine-max-canopy-penetration-with-several-nozzle-types-and-pressures

    • Crossref
  • Miller, P.C.H., Tuck, C.R., Murphy, S., and Ferreira, M. (2008). Measurement of the droplet velocities in sprays produced by different designs of agricultural spray nozzle.Paper ID ILASS08-8-5, 22nd ILASS-Europe, 8-10 September 2008, Como Lake, Italy.

  • Ozkan H.E., Reichard D.L., Sweeney J.S. (1992). Droplet size distributions across the fan patterns of new and worn nozzles.Transaction of the ASAE, 35(4), 1097–1102.

  • Schick, R.J. (2006). Spray Technology Reference Guide: Understanding Drop Size Spraying Systems Co.

  • Subr, A.K., Sawa, J., & Parafiniuk, S. (2015). Practical Deviation in Sustainable Pesticide Application Process. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7, 241-248. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.037

  • Vallet, A. and Tinet, C. (2013). Characteristics of droplets from single and twin jet air induction nozzles: a preliminary investigation. Crop Protection, 48: 63-68.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search