Change in the Parameters of Soils Contaminated by Oil and Oil Products

Zafarjon Jabbarov 1 , Tokhtasin Abdrakhmanov 1 , Alim Pulatov 2 , Peter Kováčik 3 and Khabibullo Pirmatov 2
View More View Less
  • 1 National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • 2 EcoGIS Center, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • 3 Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
Volume/Issue:
Volume 65: Issue 3
Published online:
18 Oct 2019
Pages:
88–98
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2019-0009
Open access

Abstract

The oil well drilling and oil processing industries are globally the main contaminants of environmental condition caused by human economic activities. Oil spills have a negative impact on the environment, economy, and society. In this research, the effects of oil with different chemical contents on soil types formed in two soil-climatic conditions have been studied. The purpose of this research is to study the change of soil properties by oil pollution. The experiments have been conducted in irrigated and non-irrigated soils of the desert region of the Kashkadarya and Surkhandarya (Uzbekistan). The results have shown that aggregates (0.25; 0.5; 1; 2; 3; 5; 7; 10 mm) which are the important of soil fertility have changed by oil and oil production, and the changes have proven to be temporary. The effect of the 5% and 15% concentrations of oil, engine oil, petrol, kerosene has been studied. The aggregates 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm have the biggest change among aggregates, in fact, aggregates of 0.25 mm at the level of 5% of oil decreased by 27.02%, at the level of 15% of oil decreased by 99.8%, at the level of 5% of kerosene decreased by 2%, at the level of 15% of oil decreased by 98.1%. Aggregates of 0.5 mm at the level of 5% of oil decreased by 6.44%, at the level of 15% of oil decreased by 67.14%, at the level of 5% of kerosene decreased by 12.75%, at the level of 15% of oil decreased by 92.8%. Engine oil and Petrol at levels 5 and 15 have relatively rare changed. Also, as a result of oil and oil pollution, the total carbon dioxide in the soil has grown briefly, which is an anthropogenic carbon and insignificant for soil fertility and humus. As a result, an anthropogenic carbon increased in gray-brown soil (Durisols Technic, WRB) at 0 – 35 cm layer by 0.22%, irrigated meadow-alluvial soil (Fluvisols, WRB) by 0.31%, irrigated gray-brown soil (Durisols Technic, WRB) by 0.44%, irrigated Takyr-meadow soil (Calsisols, WRB) by 0.25%, Takyr soil (Calsisols, WRB) by 0.32%, sandy Desert soil (Durisols Technic, WRB) by 0.21%.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AGAMUTHU P. ‒ TAN Y.S. ‒ FAUZIAH S.H. 2013. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil using selected organic wastes. In Procedia Environmental Sciences vol. 18 pp. 694 – 702. DOI: org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.04.094

  • AGNELLO A.C. – BAGARD M. – HULLEBUSCH E.D. – ESPOSITO G. – HUGUENOT D. 2016. Comparative bioremediation of heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons co-contaminated soil by natural attenuation phytore-mediation bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation. In Science of the Total Environment vol. 563‒564 pp. 693 – 703. DOI: org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.061

  • AKINWUMI I.I. – DIWA D. – OBIANIGWE N. 2014. Effects of crude oil contamination on the index properties strength and permeability of lateritic clay. In Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research vol. 3 no. 4 pp. 816 ‒ 824. DOI: 10.6088/ijaser.030400007

  • AKPOVETA O.V. 2016. Fenton oxidative mechanism and its kinetics on the remediation of soil contaminated with unrefined petroleum oil. In Journal of Chemical Society of Nigeria vol. 41 no. 2 pp. 54 ‒ 61.

  • ALOTAIBI H.S. ‒ USMAN A.R. ‒ ABDULJABBAR A.S. ‒ OK Y.S. ‒ Al-FARAJ A.I. ‒ SALLAM A.S. ‒ AL-WABEL M.I. 2018. Carbon mineralization and biochemical effects of short-term wheat straw in crude oil contaminated sandy soil. In Applied Geochemistry vol. 88 pp. 276 ‒ 287. DOI: org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.02.017

  • ARINUSHKINA E.V. 1970. Soil Chemical Analysis Guide. Moskow: Moscow State University Press 488 pp.

  • BALLIANA A.G. – MOURA B.B. – INCKOT R.C. – BONA C. 2017. Development of Canavalia ensiformis in soil contaminated with diesel oil. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research International vol. 24 no. 1 pp. 979 – 986. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7674-1

  • BARATI M. ‒ SAFARZADEH S. ‒ MOWLA D. ‒ BAKHTIARI F. 2018. Improvement of petroleum hydrocarbon remediation using the oat plant in the soil treated by poultry manure. In Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research vol. 6 no. 4 pp. 253 ‒ 261. DOI: 10.22102/JAEHR.2018.141039.1094

  • CRUZ J.M. – LOPES P.M. – MONTAGNOLLI N. – TAMADA I.S. – GSILVA N.M. –BIDOIA E.D. 2013. Phytotoxicity of soil contaminated with petroleum derivatives and biodiesel. In Ecotoxicology and Environmental Contamination vol. 8 no. 1 pp. 49 – 54. DOI: 10.5132/eec.2013.01.007

  • ERRINGTON I. – KING C.K. – HOULAHAN S. – GEORGE S.C. – MICHIE A. – HOSE G.C. 2018. The influence of vegetation and soil properties on springtail communities in a diesel-contaminated soil. In Science of the Total Environment vol. 1 pp. 1098 – 1104. DOI: org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.186

  • FAO. 2014. World reference base for soil resources http://www.fao.org

  • GAO Y. – GUO SH. – WANG J. – LI D. – WANG H. – ZENG D. 2014. Effects of different remediation treatments on crude oil contaminated saline soil. In Chemosphere vol. 117 pp. 486 – 493. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.070

  • GARGOURI B. – KARRAY F. – ZHIRI N. – ALOUI F. – SAYADI S. 2014. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons-contaminated soil by bacterial consortium isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. In Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology vol. 89 pp. 978 – 987. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4188

  • GOST. 17.4.4.02-84. 2008. Nature protection. Soils. Methods for sampling and preparation of soil for chemical bacteriological and helmintoglogical analysis. pp.1 ‒ 8.

  • GUARINO C. – SPADA V. – SCIARRILLO R. 2017. Assessment of three approaches of bioremediation (Natural Attenuation Landfarming and Bioagumentation e Assistited Landfarming) for a petroleum hydrocarbons contaminated soil. In Chemosphere vol. 170 pp. 10 ‒ 16. DOI: org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.165

  • HUANG L. – XIE J. – BY L.V. – SHI X.F. – LI G.Q. – LIANG F.L. – LIAN J. 2013. Optimization of nutrient component for diesel oil degradation by Acinetobacter beijerinckii ZRS. In Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 76 no. 1 – 2 pp. 325 – 332. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.03.037

  • International standard. 2005. International Organization of Standardization. Standard of Soil quality ISO 10390:2005 (E).

  • IQBAL M.Z. – KHURSHEED S. – SHAFIQ M. 2016. Effects of motor oil pollution on soil and seedling growth of Parkinsonia aculeata L. In Scientia Agriculturae vol. 13 no. 3 pp. 130 ‒ 136. DOI: 10.15192/PSCP.SA.2016.13.3.130136

  • KARPOV A.V. 2013. Development of technology for ecological remediation of man-caused lands by the example of the impact zone of the Volgograd Refinery. PhD dissertation. Volgograd: Volgograd State University.

  • KÄSTNER M. – MILTNER A. 2016. Application of compost for effective bioremediation of organic contaminants and pollutants in soil. In Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology vol. 100 pp. 3433 – 3443. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7378-y

  • KUO H.C. – JUANG D.F. – YANG L. – KUO W.C. – WU Y.M. 2014. Phytoremediation of soil contaminated by heavy oil with plants colonized by mycorrhizal fungi. In International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology vol. 11 no. 6 pp. 1661 – 1668. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0353-6

  • LAWSON I.YD. – NARTEY E.K. – DARKO D.A. – OKRAH V.A. – TSATSU D. 2012. Microbial degradation potential of some Ghanaian soils contaminated with diesel oil. In Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America vol. 3 no. 1 pp. 1 – 5. DOI: 10.5251/abjna.2012.3.1.1.5

  • LI J. – GUO C. – LU G. – YI X. – DANG Z. 2016. Bioremediation of petroleum - contaminated acid soil by a constructed bacterial consortium immobilized on sawdust: influences of multiple factors. In Water Air & Soil Pollution vol. 227 no. 12 pp. 444 ‒ 452. DOI: org/10.1007/s11270-016-3117-3

  • LIM M.W. – LAU E.V. – POH P.E. 2016. A comprehensive guide of remediation technologies for oil contaminated soil - Present works and future directions. In Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 109 no. 1 pp. 14 – 45. DOI: org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.023

  • MOHAMMADI-SICHANI M.M. – ASSADI M.M. – FARAZMAND A. – KIANIRAD M.A. – AHADI M. – GHAHDERIJANI H.H. 2017. Bioremediation of soil contaminated crude oil by Agaricomycetes. In Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering vol. 15 no. 8 pp.1 ‒ 6. DOI.org/10.1186/s40201-016-0263-x

  • MOUBASHER H.A. – HEGAZY A.K. – MOHAMED N.H. – MOUSTAFA Y.M. – KABIEL H.F. – HAMAD A.A. 2015. Phytoremediation of soils polluted with crude petroleum oil using Bassia scoparia and its associated rhizosphere microorganisms. In International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation vol. 98 no. 3 pp. 113 ‒ 120. DOI:10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.11.019

  • OKOLELOVA A.A. – JELTOBRYUXOV V.F. – TARACOB A.P. – KASTERINA N.G. 2015. Normal feature of oil products in the soil covering. In Scientific Magazine Fundamental Investigatin vol. 23 no. 12 pp. 315 ‒ 319.

  • PANCHENKO L. – MURATOVA A. – DUBROVSKAYA E. – GOLUBEV S. –TURKOVSKAYA O. 2017a. Dynamics of natural revegetation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil and remediation potential of indigenous plant species in the steppe zone of the southern Volga Uplands. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research vol. 25 no. 4 pp. 3260 ‒ 3274. DOI: org/10.1007/s11356-017-0710-y

  • PANCHENKO L. – MURATOVA A. – TURKOVSKAYA O. 2017b. Comparison of the phytoremediation potentials of Medicago falcata L. and Medicago sativa L. in aged oil-sludge-contaminated soil. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research vol. 24 no. 3 pp. 3117 – 3130. DOI: org/10.1007/s11356-016-8025-y

  • PETROV A.M. – VERSIONING A.A. – KARIMULLIN L.K. – AKAIKIN D.V. –TARASOV O.YU. 2016. Dynamics of ecological and biological characteristics of soddy-podzolic soils under long-term oil pollution. In Eurasian Soil Science vol. 49 no. 7 pp. 784 – 791. DOI: org/10.1134/S1064229316050124

  • PETROVA N.A. 2014. Influence of chemical pollution on biological properties of soils of dry steppes and semi-deserts of the south of Russia. PhD dissertation. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University.

  • POLYAK Y.M. - BAKINA L.G. - CHUGUNOVA M.V. - MAYACHKINA N.V. - GERASIMOV A.O. - BURE V.M. 2018. Effect of remediation strategies on biological activity of oil-contaminated soil ‒ A field study. In International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation vol. 126 no. 1 pp. 57 – 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.10.004

  • ROY A.S. – BARUAH R. – BORAH M. – SINGH A.K. – DEKA BORUAH H.P. – SAIKIA N. – DEKA M. – DUTTA N. – BORA T.CH. 2014. Bioremediation potential of native hydrocarbon degrading bacterial strains in crude oil contaminated soil under microcosm study. In International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation vol. 94 pp. 79 ‒ 89. DOI: org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.03.024

  • SMARANDA M. - EUGENIA G. - IONICA O. - MARIUS P. 2016. For a sustainable development: Phytore-mediation of oil-polluted soils by using birdsfoot trefoil crops. In Romanian Biotechnological Letter vol. 22 no. 6 pp.12010 ‒ 12017.

  • SOLEIMANI M. – FARHOUDI M. – JAN H. 2013. Chemometric assessment of enhanced bioremediation of oil contaminated soils. In Journal of Hazardous Materials vol. 254–255 no. 15 pp. 372 – 381. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.004

  • SOLLY G. - ASWATHY E. - BERLIN S. - KRISHNAPRABHA N. - MARIA G. 2015. Study on geotechnical properties of diesel oil contaminated soil. In International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 113 ‒ 117.

  • TRELLU C. - MILTNER A. - GALLO R. - HUGUENOT D. - HULLEBUSCH E.D. - ESPOSITO G. - OTURAN M.A. - KÄSTNER M. 2017. Characteristics of PAH tar oil contaminated soils-Black particles resins and implications for treatment strategies. In Journal of Hazardous Materials vol. 327 pp. 206 – 215. DOI: org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.062

  • TUMANYAN A.F. – TYUTYUMA N.V. – BONDARENKO A.N. – SHCHERBAKOVA N.A. 2017. Influence of oil pollution on various types of soil. In Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils vol. 53 no. 3 pp. 369 ‒ 376. DOI: 10.1007/s10553-017-0813-7

  • TURSUNOV L. 1988. Soil physics. Tashkent: National University Press 220 pp. ISBN 5-8244-0072-5

  • WANG Y. – JIANG F. – QIANXIN L. – LYU X. – WANG X. – WANG G. 2013. Effects of crude oil contamination on soil physical and chemical properties in Momoge wetland of China. In Chinese Geographical Science vol. 23 no. 6 pp. 708 – 715. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-013-0641-6

  • World reference base for soil resources WRB 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources reports. no. 106 Rome : FAO 181 pp.

  • WU M. – LI W. – WARREN A.D. – YE X. – CHEN K. – KOST D. – CHEN L. 2017. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon degradation in a petroleum contaminated soil and microbial population and activity determination. In Chemosphere vol. 169 no. 18 pp. 124 ‒ 130. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.059.

  • ZVYAGINSEV D.G. 1991. Methods of microbiology and biochemistry. Moscow: Moscow State University Press 239 pp. ISBN 5-211-01675-0.
Cover Image of: Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)
Search
Journal information
ISSN:
1338-4376
First Published:
06 Jun 2011
Language:
English
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.81

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.248
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.535

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 92 92 45
PDF Downloads 115 115 66