Response of Two Potato Varieties to Irrigation Methods in the Dry Mediterranean Area

Ibrahim Mubarak 1 , Mussaddak Janat 2  and Mohsen Makhlouf 3
  • 1 PhD. Department of Agriculture, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, P.O. Box 6091, , Damascus, Syria
  • 2 PhD., Department of Agriculture, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, P.O. Box 6091, , Damascus, Syria
  • 3 M.Sc., Department of Agriculture, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, P.O. Box 6091, , Damascus, Syria


Due to water scarcity and dry Mediterranean conditions, improving water use efficiency is a major challenge for sustainable crop production and environment protection. Field experiments were conducted for two consecutive years (2010 and 2011) to assess the effects of variety and irrigation method on potato crop, following a 2 × 4 factorial experiment type arranged in a split plot design with two spring potato varieties (Spunta and Marfona), and four irrigation methods (drip irrigation with two modes of dripper spacing/dripper flow: 30 cm at 4 l/h and 60 cm at 8 l/h, sprinkle irrigation, and furrow irrigation), with three replicates. Potato was irrigated when soil moisture in the active root depth was within the range of 75-80% of field capacity as determined by the neutron probe technique. Results did not show any differences between both varieties. Moreover, no differences in marketable yield, total dry matter, and harvest index were found between irrigation methods. However, results showed that sprinkle irrigation significantly enhanced nitrogen use efficiency. Furthermore, both water productivity and irrigation water use efficiency were significantly increased under drip irrigation compared with the other irrigation methods. They were about twice those under furrow irrigation, indicating that the employment of drip irrigation method can effectively address water shortage and sustainable potato production, in the dry Mediterranean region.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BEREŚ, P.K. 2010. Harmfulness of Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. on some non-Bt versus genetically modified Bt maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars in Poland in 2006-2007. In Journal of Plant Protection Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 110-116. DOI: 10.2478/v10045-010-0019-z

  • DÍAZ, O.H. - ALDABA MEZA, J.L. - BALTAZAR, B.M. - BOJÓRQUEZ, G.B. - CASTRO ESPINOZA, L. - CORRALES MADRID, J.L. - DE LA FUENTE MARTÍNEZ, J.M. - DURÁN POMPA, H.A. - ALONSO ESCOBEDO, J. - ESPINOZA BANDA, A. - GARZÓN TIZNADO, J.A. - GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA, J. - GUZMÁN RODRÍGUEZ, J.L. - MADUEÑO MARTÍNEZ, J.I. - MARTÍNEZ CARRILLO, J.L. - MENG, C. - QUIÑONES PANDO, F.J. - ROSALES ROBLES, E. - RUIZ ERNÁNDEZ, I. - TREVIÑO RAMÍREZ, J.E. - URIBE MONTES, H.U. - ZAVALA GARCÍA, F. 2017. Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MONØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico. In Transgenic Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 135-151. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-016-9991-z

  • GÓMEZ-BARBERO, M. - BERBEL, J. - RODRÍGUEZCEREZO, E. 2008. Bt corn in Spain - the performance of the EU’s first GM crop. In Nature Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 384-386. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0408-384

  • GOUSE, M. - PRAY, C.E. - KIRSTEN, J. - SCHIMMELPFENNIG, D. 2005. A GM subsistence crop in Africa: the case of Bt white maize in South Africa. Innternational Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 1-3, pp. 84-94. DOI: 10.1504/IJBT.2005.006447

  • GRAEBER, J.V. - NAFZIGER, E.D. - MIES, D.W. 1999. Evaluation of transgenic Bt-containing corn hybrids. In Journal of Production Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 659-663. DOI: 10.2134/jpa1999.0659


  • Areawide suppression of European corn borer with Bt maize reaps savings to non-Bt maize growers. In Science, vol. 330, no. 6001, pp. 222-225. DOI: 10.1126/science.1190242

  • JONES, P.J. - MCFARLANE, L.D. - PARK, J.R. - TRANTER, R.B. 2017. Assessing the potential economic benefits to farmers from various GM crops becoming available in the European Union by 2025: Results from an expert survey. In Agricultural Systems, vol. 155, pp. 158-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.05.005

  • KOCOUREK, F. - STARÁ, J. 2012. Efficacy of Bt maize against European corn borer in Cetral Europe. In Plant Protection Science, vol. 48, pp. S25-S35.

  • LAUER, J. - WEDBERG, J. 1999. Grain yield of initial Bt corn hybrid introductions to farmers in the Northern corn belt. In Journal of Production Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 373-376. DOI: 10.2134/jpa1999.0373

  • MA, B.J. - SUBEDI, K.D. 2005. Development, yield, grain moisture and nitrogen uptake of Bt corn hybrids and their conventional near-isolines. In Field Crops Research, vol. 93, no. 2-3, pp. 199-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.09.021

  • MARRA, M. - PANNELL, D.J. - ABADI GHADIM, A. 2003. The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: Where are we on the learning curve? In Agricultural Systems, vol. 75, no. 2-3, pp. 215-234. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00066-5

  • MIHALČÍK, P. - HRČKOVÁ, K. - SINGER, M. - PLAČKOVÁ, A. - KRAIC, J. 2012. Effect of MON 810 cultivation and prevention to adventitious presence in non- GM fields: A case study in Slovakia. In Plant Protection Science, vol. 48, pp. S11-S17.

  • MUNGAI, N.W. - MOTAVALLI, P.P. - NELSON, K.A. - KREMER, R.J. 2005. Differences in yields, residue composition and N mineralization dynamics of Bt and non- Bt maize. In Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 101-109. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-005-8850-8

  • OSTRY, V. - OVESNA, J. - SKARKOVA, J. - POUCHOVA, V. - RUPRICH, J. 2010. A review on comparative data concerning Fusarium mycotoxins in Bt maize and non-Bt isogenic maize. In Mycotoxin Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 141-145. DOI: 10.1007/s12550-010-0056-5

  • PAPST, C. - UTZ, H.F. - MELCHINGER, A.E. - EDER, J. - MAGG, T. - KLEIN, D. - BOHN, M. 2004. Mycotoxins produced by Fusarium spp. in isogenic Bt vs. non-Bt maize hybrids under European corn borer pressure. In Agronomy Journal, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 219-224. DOI:10.2134/agronj2005.0219

  • RAVISANKAR, D. - MUTHUKRISHNAN, P. - CHINNUSAMY, C. 2011. Evaluation of bio-efficacy, weed control and crop productivity in herbicide resistant ransgenic corn hybrids (MON 89034 × NK603). In Biotechnology Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, vol. 1, pp. 369-374.

  • RICE, M.E. - PILCHER, C.D. 1998. Potential benefits and limitations of transgenic Bt corn for management of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). In Americal Entomologist, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 75-78. DOI: 10.1093/ae/44.2.75

  • TERORE, S.B. - CARLSON, R.E. - PILCHER, C.D. - RICE, M.E. 2000. Bt and non-Bt maize growth and development as affected by temperature and drought stress. In Agronomy Journal, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1027-1035. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2000.9251027x

  • XU, Z. - HENNESSY, D.A. - SARDANA, K. - MOSCHINI, G.C. 2013. The realized yield effect of genetically engineered crops: U.S. maize and soybean. In Crop Science, vol. 53, pp. 735-745. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2012.06.0399

  • YANNI, S.F. - WHALEN, J.K. - MA, B.-L. 2011. Field-grown Bt and non-Bt corn: Yield, chemical composition, and decomposability. In Agronomy Journal, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 486-493. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0367


Journal + Issues