The Relative Age Effect On The Selection In The Slovakia National Football Teams

Open access

Summary

The focus of this research was to determine the relative age effect (RAE) on selection in the Slovakia national football teams. A factor that may have a significant impact on the quality of players chosen for the national teams or may result in a poor selection of players for the elite teams. Anthropometric and cognitive acceleration of players born in the first months of the calendar year concerning the overall context of the competition for placement in the national teams may be considered as a significant advantage. The aim of this research was to examine, determine and verify the presence of relative age effect in the selection of football players for the Slovakia national teams starting with the under 16 age category (U-16) through to the A - senior national football team. We presumed that the elite teams under this review and study consisted predominantly of players born in the first quarter of the calendar year, while also presuming that relative age effect receded with the increasing age category. Our survey sample U16 consisted of 79 players, U17 consisted of 47 players, U18 consisted of 58 players, U19 consisted of 71 players, U21 consisted of 52 players and A - senior national team consisted of 302 Slovakia national football players. The information obtained from the Slovak Football Association has been processed by the application of statistical methods and statistical significance test (T-test). Our research confirmed the presence of relative age effect in the U-16, U-17 and U-18 teams under our investigation (p≤0.01). In the U19 and U21 age categories, statistical significance has not been confirmed. As for the senior national team, statistically significant difference has been found in relation to players born in the last quarter of the year as opposed to players born in the first three months of the year (p≤0.01). Our results have shown that with the increasing age, the relative age effect fades and vanishes in full in the category of senior elite players. In the U-19 and U-21 age categories, statistical significance has not been confirmed. Based on this research results it may be recommended to use the advantage of relative age effect for the selection of players of the particular age category in the particular competition (such as e.g. the European Championship qualification, the European Championship final tournament qualification, or the World Cup qualification in the U-16, U-17, U-18 age categories).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. AGRICOLA et al. 2012. Age effect v juniorskom tenise. [Age effect in junior tennis] Studia sportiva Brno: FSpS MU Brno 6(2) p. 38-45. ISSN 1802-7679.

  • 2. AUGSTE C. and M. LAMES 2011. The relative age effect and success in German elite U-17 soccer teams. Journal of Sports Sciences29(9) page 983-987.

  • 3. BARNSLEY R. H. A.H. THOMPSON and P.E. BARNSLEY 1985. Hockey success and birthdate: The relative age effect. Journal of the Canadian Association of Health Physical Education and Recreation 51 p. 23-28.

  • 4. BARNSLEY R. H. A.H. THOMPSON and P. LEGAULT 1992. Family Planning: Football Style. The Relative Age Effect in Football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 27(1) p. 77-86.

  • 5. BAXTER-JONES et al. 1995. Growth and development of male gymnasts swimmers soccer and tennis players: A longitudinal study. Annals of Human Biology22(5) p. 381-394.

  • 6. CAMPO et al. 2010. The relative age effect in youth soccer players from Spain. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 9(2) p. 190-198.

  • 7. COSTA et al. 2012. Relative age effect in Brazilian soccer players: a historical analysis. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport12(3) p. 563-570.

  • 8. DANIEL T. E. and C.T.L. JANSSEN 1987. More on the Relative Age Effect. Canadian Association for Health Physical Education and Recreation53(3) page 21-24.

  • 9. DELORME N. J. BOICHÉ and M. RASPAUD 2009. The relative age effect in elite sport: the French case. Research quarterly for exercise and sport80(2) p. 336-344.

  • 10. EDWARDS S. 1994. Born too late to win? Nature370(6486) p. 186.

  • 11. GIACOMINI C. P. 1999. Association of Birthdate with Success of Nationally Ranked Junior Tennis Players. Perceptual and Motor Skills89(2) p. 381-386.

  • 12. GREGORA P. and M. MIKULIČ 2015. Relative age effect on the selection to youth national teams for elite tournament in football. SVOUC 2015. Bratislava: FTVŠ UK.

  • 13. GRONDIN S. and S. KOREN 2000. The Relative Age Effect in Professional Baseball: A Look at the History of Major League Baseball and at Current Status in Japan AVANTEONTARIO6(2) p. 64-74.

  • 14. GONZÁLES ARAMENDI J. M. 2007. El efecto relativo de la edad en el fútbol [The relative age effect in football]. Archivos de Medicina del Deporte 24 p. 9-17.

  • 15. GRONDIN S. P. DESHAIES and L.P. NAULT 1984. Trimestres de naissance et participation au hockey et au volleyball. Revue Quebecoise de l'Activite Physique 2 p. 97-103.

  • 16. HELSEN F. J. WINCKEL and M. WILLIAMS 2005. The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe. Journal of Sports Science 23(6). ISSN 1466-447X.

  • 17. HELSEN F. J. WINCKEL and J.Z. STARKES 2000. Effects of a Change in Selection Year on Success in Male Soccer Players. American Journal of Human Biology. 12(6) p. 729-735.

  • 18. HURLEY W. D. LIOR and S. TRACZE 2001. A Proposal to Reduce the Age Discrimination in Canadian Minor Hockey. Canadian Public Policy27(1) p. 65-75.

  • 19. KAMPMILLER T. et al. 2010. Základy metodológie výskumu v telesnej výchove a športe. [The methodology of research in physical education and sports] Bratislava: ICM Agency. ISBN 978-80-89-257-27-0.

  • 20. MERTON R. M. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

  • 21. MUJIKA et al. 2009. The Relative Age in a Professional Club Setting. Journal of Sports Sciences 27(11) p. 1153-1158.

  • 22. MUSCH J. and R. HAY 1999. The relative age effect in soccer: cross-cultural evidence for a systematic discrimination against children born late in the competition year. Sociology of Sport Journal 16(1) p. 54-64.

  • 23. PERÁČEK P. 2004. Teória a didaktika športových hier. [Theory and didactics of sports games] Bratislava: PEEM. 2. vydanie. ISBN 80-89197-09-4.

  • 24. PERÁČEK P. 2014. Talent vo futbale I. (identifikácia selekcia) [Talent in football I. (identification selection)] Bratislava: FTVŠ UK v Bratislave. ISBN 978-80-971646-2-1.

  • 25. PEREZ JIMENEZ I. and M.T.G. PAIN 2008. Relative age effect in Spanish association football: its extent and implications for wasted potential. Journal of Sports Sciences26(10) p. 995–1003.

  • 26. SAAVERDA et al. 2014. Relative age effect in lower categories of international basketball. In: International Review for the Sociology of Sport. ISSN 1012-6902.

  • 27. THOMPSON A. H. R.H. BARNSLEY and G. STEBELSKY 1991. “Born to Play Ball” The Relative Age Effect and Major League Baseball. Sociology of Sport Journal 8 p. 146-151.

  • 28. VAEYENS R. R.M. PHILIPPAERTS and R.M. MALINA 2005. The relative age effect in soccer: a match-related perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences 23(7) p. 747-756.

  • 29. VINCENT J. and F.D. GLAMSER 2006. Gender differences in the relative age effect among US Olympic development program for youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences 24(4).

  • 30. WATTIE et al. 2007. Injuries in Canadian youth ice hockey: the influence of relative age. Paediatrics120(1) p. 142-148.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 261 159 1
PDF Downloads 113 79 2