Tribological Response of Heat Treated AISI 52100 Steels Against Steel and Ceramic Counterparts

Open access

Abstract

AISI 52100 bearing steels are commonly used in applications requiring high hardness and abrasion resistance. The bearing steels are working under dynamic loads in service conditions and their toughness properties become important. In order to provide the desired mechanical properties, various heat treatments (austenizing, quenching and tempering) are usually applied. In this study, AISI 52100 bearing steel samples were austenized at 900°C for ½ h and water quenched to room temperature. Then tempering was carried out at 795°C, 400°C and 200°C for ½ h. In order to investigate the effect of heat treatment conditions on wear behavior, dry friction tests were performed according to ASTM G99-05 Standard with a ‘ball-on-disk’ type tribometer. The samples were tested against steel and ceramic counterparts using the parameters of 100 m distance and 30 N load and 0.063 m/s rotational speed. After wear test, the surface characterization was carried out using microscopy. Wear loss values were calculated using a novel optical method on both flat and counterpart specimens.

[1] Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. (2012). Steels for bearings. Progress in Materials Science. 57(2), 268-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.06.002.

[2] Wang, Y., Lei, T.C. & Gao, C.Q. (1990). Influence of isothermal hardening on the sliding wear behaviour of 52100 bearing steel. Tribology International. 23, 47-53. DOI: 10.1016/0301-679X(90)90072-W.

[3] Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H. (2010). Mechanical bearings. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Technical report.

[4] Zaretsky, E.V. (2012). Rolling Bearing Steels—A Technical and Historical Perspective. Cleveland OH: NASA Glenn Research Center, Technical Report, NASA/TM 2012-217445.

[5] Polonsky, I.A. & Keer, L.M. (1995). On white etching band formation in rolling bearings. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 43, 637-669. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(95)00001-Y.

[6] Chattopadhyay, S. & Sellars, C.M. (1982). Kinetics of pearlite spheroidisation during static annealing and during hot deformation. Acta Metallurgica. 30(1), 157-70. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(82)90055-4.

[7] Verhoeven, J.D. (2005). Metallurgy of Steel for Bladesmiths & Others who Heat Treat and Forge Steel. Iowa State University. Retrieved from archive.org https://tinyurl.com/glz264k.

[8] Polat, S., Türedi, E., Atapek, S.H. & Köseoglu, M. (2013). Wear Behaviour of Heat Treated 100Cr6 Steels. Materials Testing. 55(4), 290-293. DOI: 10.3139/120.110437.

[9] Türedi, E. (2015). The Effect of Heat Treatment on Tribological Behavior of AISI 52100 Steels under Dry Sliding Condition. In 4th International Conference of Engineering Against Failure (ICEAF IV), 24-26 June 2015 (pp. 98-104). Skiathos, Greece: LTSM (University of Patras).

[10] ASTM G99-05 (2010). Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.

[11] Türedi, E. (2016). A novel approach in determining wear volume: precise optical profilometric measurement with limited depth of field in light microscopy. In 1st International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress (IMSEC 2016), 26-28 October 2016 (pp. 2602-2610). Adana-Turkey: Cukurova University. (in Turkish).

[12] Türedi, E. (2016). Direct Profilometric Measurement of Wear Volumes using Optical Microscope in Cast Iron Alloys After Dry Sliding Test. In 1st International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress (IMSEC 2016), 26-28 October 2016 (pp. 4472-4480). Adana-Turkey: Cukurova University. (in Turkish).

[13] Tabor, D. (1951). The Hardness of Metals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[14] Zum Gahr, K.H. (1987). Microstructure and Wear of Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. B.V.

[15] Paland, E.G. (1982). Fretting corrosion in rolling bearings – cause and avoidance. Sutton Coldfield (UK): INA Bearing Comp. Ltd. Technical Report.

Archives of Foundry Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.316

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 215 212 12
PDF Downloads 83 82 3