Phase Field Study of Microstructure Evolution in Eutectoid Phase Transformation – I Nucleation

Open access


Eutectoid growth, as the important reaction mechanism of the carbon steel heat treatment, is the basis to control the microstructure and performance. At present, most studies have focused on lamellar growth, and did not consider the nucleation process. Mainly due to the nucleation theory is inconclusive, a lot of research can support their own theory in a certain range. Based on the existing nucleation theory, this paper proposes a cooperative nucleation model to simulate the nucleation process of eutectoid growth. In order to ensure that the nucleation process is more suitable to the theoretical results, different correction methods were used to amend the model respectively. The results of numerical simulation show that when the model is unmodified, the lateral growth of single phase is faster than that of longitudinal growth, so the morphology is oval. Then, the effects of diffusion correction, mobility correction and ledges nucleation mechanism correction on the morphology of nucleation and the nucleation rate were studied respectively. It was found that the introduction of boundary diffusion and the nucleation mechanism of the ledges could lead to a more realistic pearlite.

[1] Su, Y.Q, Li, X.Z., Guo, J. J. et al. (2006). Phase-field research of microstructure evolution for directionally solidified peritectic transition. Simulation of Nucleation-Controlled Microstructure. Acta Metallurgica Sinica. (06), 606-610.

[2] Wu, M.W. & Xiong, S.M. (2011). Modeling of regular eutectic growth of binary alloy based on cellular automaton method. Acta Phys. Sin-Ch Ed. 60(5), 757-765.

[3] Liu, Z., Yuan, C., Ji, Y. et al. (2011). Study on nucleation of bainite ferrite. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment. 32(10), 74-79. DOI:10.13289/j.issn.1009-6264.2011.10.027.

[4] Wang, Y.B., Wang, Y.X. & Chen, Z. et al. (2012). Phase-field Simulation of Interface Effect during Grain Nucleation of Solidification Processing. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering. (06), 1045-1048.

[5] Vaks, V.G., Stroev, A.Y. & Urtsev, V.N. et al. (2011). Experimental and theoretical study of the formation and growth of pearlite colonies in eutectoid steels. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 112(6), 961-978. DOI:10.1134/S1063776111050098.

[6] Cheng, L. (2013). The nucleation, three dimensional morphology and growth kinetics of ferrite in low carbon high strength micro-alloyed steels. Wuhan: University of Science and Technology.

[7] Steinbach, I. & Apel, M. (2006). Multi phase field model for solid state transformation with elastic strain. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 217(2), 153-160. DOI:10.1016/j.physd.2006.04.001.

[8] Steinbach, I., & Apel, M. (2007). The influence of lattice strain on pearlite formation in Fe–C. Acta Mater. 55(14), 4817-4822. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.013.

[9] Bottger, B., Eiken, J. & Steinbach, I. (2006). Phase field simulation of equiaxed solidification in technical alloys. Acta Materialia. 54(10), 2697-2704. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.008.

[10] Nakajima, K., Apel, M. & Steinbach, I. (2006). The role of carbon diffusion in ferrite on the kinetics of cooperative growth of pearlite: A multi-phase field study. Acta Mater. 54(14), 3665-3672. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.050.

[11] Zhu, M.F. & Hong, C.P. (2002). Modeling of microstructure evolution in regular eutectic growth. Physical Review B. 66, 155428-1-155428-8. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155428.

[12] Chen, R., Xu, Q. & Liu, B. (2016). Modeling of aluminum-silicon irregular eutectic growth by cellular automaton model. China Foundry. 13(2), 114-122. DOI:10.1007/s41230-016-5127-6.

[13] Xiong, S.M., Wu, M.W. (2012). Experimental and Modeling Studies of the Lamellar Eutectic Growth of Mg-Al Alloy. 43(1), 208-218. DOI:10.1007/s11661-011-0831-8

[14] Liu, Z.C., Yuan, C.J., Ji, Y.P. et al. (2011). Nucleation of pearlite transformation. Heat Treatment of Metals. 36(2), 14-17.

Archives of Foundry Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.316

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 225 171 15
PDF Downloads 108 87 4