The Influence of Chemical Surface Treatment on the Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Castings Used in Dental Prosthetics

Open access

Abstract

Air abrasion process is used for cleaning casting surface of prosthetic components, and to prepare the surface of these elements for the application of veneering items. Its side effect, however, is that abrasive particles are embedded in the treated surface, which can be up to 30% of the surface and it constitutes the side effect of this procedure. Such a significant participation of foreign material can not be indifferent to the properties of the surface. Embedded particles can be the place of stress concentration causing cracking of ceramics, and may deteriorate corrosion resistance by forming corrosive microlinks. In the latter cases, it would be advisable to remove elements embedded into the surface. The simplest method is chemical etching or electrochemical one. Nevertheless, these procedures should not significantly change the parameters of the surface. Among many possible reagents only a few fulfills all the above conditions. In addition, processing should not impair corrosion resistance of titanium, which is one of the most important factors determining its use as a prosthetic restoration in the mouth. The study presented results of corrosion resistance of titanium used to make prosthetic components by means of casting method, which were subjected to chemical processing designed to remove the embedded abrasive particles. The aim of the study was to investigate whether etching with selected reagents affects the corrosion resistance of titanium castings. For etching the following reagents were used: 30% HNO3 + 3% HF + H2O, HNO3+ HF+ glycerol (1:2:3), 4% HF in H2O2, 4% HF in H2O, with a control sandblasted sample, not subjected to etching. Tests demonstrated that the etching affected corrosion properties of test samples, in each case the reduction of the corrosion potential occurred - possibly due to the removal of particles of Al2O3 from the surface and activation of the surface. None of the samples underwent pitting corrosion as a result of polarization to 9 V. Values of the polarization resistance, and potentiodynamic characteristics indicated that the best corrosion resistance exhibited the samples after etching in a mixture of 4% solution of HF in H2O2. They showed very good passivation of the surface.

[1] Surowska, B. (2009). Biomaterials metal and metal-to-ceramic dental applications. Lublin: Ed. Lublin University of Technology.

[2] Marciniak, J. (2002). Biomaterials. Gliwice: Ed. Silesian University of Technology.

[3] Czarnowska, E., Krupa, D., Wierzchoń, T. (2004). Surface Engineering of titanium in the manufacture of biomaterials. Warszawa: Ed. Warsaw University of Technology.

[4] Lauterschlager, E.P. & Monaghan, P. (1993). Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int. Dental of Journals. 43(3), 245-253.

[5] Czarnowska, E., Wierzchoń, T. & Maranda-Niedbała, A. (1999). Properties of the surfaces layers on titanium alloy and their biocompatibility in in vitro tests. J. Mater Process. Technol. 92(1), 190-194.

[6] Niionomi, M. (1998). Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Material Sc. And Engineering A. 243, 231-236.

[7] Orlicki, R. & Kłaptocz, B. (2005). Titanium and its alloys - properties, applications in dentistry and processing methods. In VI International Scientific Symposium Dental Engineering Biomaterials, 17-19 June 2005.

[8] Guo, L., Liu, X., Gao, J., Yang, J., Guo, T. & Zhu, Y. (2010). Effect of Surface Modifications on the Bonding Strength of Titanium–Porcelain. Mater. Manuf. Processes 25(8) 710-717.

[9] Majewski, S.W. (2005). Reconstruction of teeth with fixed restorations. Krak#x00F3;w: Ed. Foundation for the Development of Prosthodontics.

[10] Lin, M., Kuo-Lung, T., Sheng-Chieh, L. & Her-Hsiung, H. (2012). Bonding of dental porcelain to non-cast titanium with different surface treatments. Dent. Mater. J. 31(6), 933-940.

[11] ISO 9693-1999. Metalceramic dental restorative systems.

[12] Hajduga, M. & Barwikowska, D. (2007). The effect of sandblasting the surface of crowns on the quality of the connection with dental ceramics. Modern Dental Technician. 3, 40-45.

[13] Oshida, Y., Munoz, C.A., Winkler, M.M., Hashem, A. & Itoh, M. (1993). Fractal dimension analysis of aluminum oxide particle for sandblasting dental use. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 3(3), 117-126.

[14] Reyes, M.J.D., Oshida, Y., Andres, C.J., Barco, T., Hovijitra, S. & Brown, D. (2001). Titanium–porcelain system. Part III: Effects of surface modification on bond strengths. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 11(2), 117-136.

[15] Gołębiowski, M., Pietnicki, K. & Klimek, L. (2010). Influence of parameters of air abrasion on the number of abrasive particles embeddet in the surface of titanium alloy. Dental Magazine. 6, 34-38.

[16] Grajek, A. Lubas, M., Kotarski, T., Wieczorek, P. & Jasiński, J. (2008). The surface state and quality of joint metal ceramic after initial sand blasting. Materials Engineering. 6, 1082-1085.

[17] Van Niekerk, A.J., Ciaputa, T. (2007). Modern dental restorations, art and crafts. Texts selected. Katowice: Elamed.

[18] Cai, Z., Bunce, N., Nunn, M.E. & Okabe, T. (2001). Porcelain adherence to dental cast CP titanium: effects of surface modifications. Biomaterials. 22, 979-986.

[19] Al Jarabbi, Y.S., Zinelis, S. & Eliades, G. (2012). Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys. Dent. Mater. J. 31(2), 249-255.

[20] Liu, X., Chu, P.K. & Ding, C. (2004). Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. 47(3), 49-121.

[21] Bandi, S., Chadalavada, D. & Kumar, A.S. (2012). Evaluation and comparison of surface modifications of commercially pure grade-I titanium by combination technique of blasting with alumina followed by acid etching and oxidation with NaOH. Annals and Essences of Dentistr. IV(4), 1-8.

[22] Darvell, B.W., Samman, N., Luk, W.K., Clark, R.K.F. & Tideman, H. (1995). Contamination of titanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting. J. Dent. 23(5), 319-322.

[23] Gołębiowski, M., Sobczak-Guzenda, A., Szymański, W. & Klimek, L. (2010). Influence of paraeters of stream abrasive treatment of titanium surfaces on contact angle and surfaces free energy. Materials Engineering. 4(173), 978-980.

[24] Parchańska-Kowalik, M. & Klimek, L. (2013). The influence of chemical processing on the condition of the titanium surface. Materials Engineering. 5(195), 526-529.

[25] Schiff, N., Dalard, F., Lissac, M., Morgon, L. & Grosgogeat, B. (2005). Corrosion resistance of three orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of three fluoride mouthwashes. European Journal of Orthodontics. 27, 541-549.

[26] Klimek, L., Pierzynka, R., Błaszczyk, T., Burnat, B., Scholl, H. & Marciniak, S. (2009). The effect of recasting on corrosion of DUCINOX prosthetic alloy. Archives of Foundry and Engineering. 9(3), 67-70.

[27] Burnat, B., Walkowiak-Przybyło, M., Błaszczyk, T. & Klimek, L. (2013). Corrosion behaviour of polished and sandblasted titanium alloys in PBS solution. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 15 (1), 87-95.

[28] Lian, T., Whalen, M.T., Wong, L. (2004). Corrosion Behavior of Titanium Grade 7 in Fluoride-Containing NaCl Brines. In 206th Electrochemical Society Fall Meeting Symposium Proceedings. 3-8 October 2004 (UCRL-CONF-207609). United States: Honolulu, HI.

Archives of Foundry Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.316

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 152 122 9
PDF Downloads 65 59 4