The Influence of the Mould Filling Conditions on the Quality of Castings Made of EN AC-44000 Alloy

Open access


The work deals with the influence of change in the filling conditions of the ceramic moulds with plaster binder on the presence of gaseous porosity and the microstructure of the achieved test castings with graded wall thickness. Castings made of EN AC-44000 alloy, produced either by gravity casting, or by gravity casting with negative pressure generated around the mould (according to the Vacumetal technology), or by counter-gravity casting were compared. The results of examinations concerning the density of the produced castings indicate that no significant change in porosity was found. The increased size of silicon crystals was found for the increased wall thicknesses due to the slower cooling and solidification of castings.

[1] Dańko, J. (2000). Machines and devices for pressure casting. Theoretical foundations. Construction. Measurements and maintenance. Cracow: Ed. AGH. (in Polish).

[2] Białobrzeski, A. (1992). Pressure casting. Machines, devices and technology. Warsaw: PWN. (in Polish).

[3] Białobrzeski, A. & Martynowska, E. (1977). Pressurereducing systems in a pressure die. Przegląd Odlewnictwa (Foundry Review), issue 5, 112-115. (in Polish).

[4] Białobrzeski, A. (1984). Machines, devices and technology of pressure casting. Cracow: Ed. Foundry Research Institute. (in Polish).

[5] Piłkowski, Z. & Czyż, M. (1997). Examinations of moulding materials intended for Vacumetal process. Krzepnięcie Metali i Stopów (Solidification of Metals and Alloys), vol. 31, 171-179. (in Polish).

[6] Ochęduszko, St. (1981). Applied thermodynamics. Warsaw: WNT. (in Polish).

[7] Wierzbicka, B. (1981). Solidification of casting alloys under external pressure. Krzepnięcie metali i stopów (Solidification of Metals and Alloys). vol. IV, 35-46. Ossolineum. (in Polish).

Archives of Foundry Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.316


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 134 132 5
PDF Downloads 46 45 6