ADM1-based modeling of anaerobic codigestion of maize silage and cattle manure – a feedstock characterisation for model implementation (part I) / Modelowanie kofermentacji kiszonki kukurydzy i obornika bydlęcego za pomocą ADM1 – charakterystyka wsadu surowcowego (część I)

Open access


This paper presents the results of fractionation of particulate and soluble organic matter in a mixture of maize silage and cattle manure (49:51% volatile solids) that was used as a feedstock for anaerobic digestion. The extended Weender’s analysis was adapted to measure raw protein, raw lipids, fraction of carbohydrates (including starch, cellulose, hemicelluloses) and lignin. The content of individual fractions in composite, Xc (as kg COD kg-1 COD) was: 0.111 proteins, 0.048 lipids, 0.500 carbohydrates and 0.341 inerts. The biodegradability of Xc was 68%. Based on material balance, the carbon concentration in Xc was 0.0326 kmol C kg-1 COD, whereas nitrogen concentration 0.0018 kmol N kg-1 COD. The estimated pH of the feedstock based on acid-base equilibrium corresponded to the actual value (pH 7.14).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Antonopoulou G. Gavala H.N. Skiadas I.V. & Lyberatos G. (2012). ADM1-based modeling of methane production from acidified sweet sorghum extract in a two stage process Bioresource Technology 106 pp. 10-19.

  • APHA (American Public Health Association) (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 18th ed. American Public Health Association Washington 1992.

  • Batstone D.J. Keller J. Angelidaki I. Kalyuzhnyi S.V. Pavlostathis S.G. Rozzi A. Sanders W.T.M. Siegrist H. & Vavilin V.A. (2002). Anaerobic digestion model No. 1. Scientific and Technical Report No. 13 IWA Publishing London 2002.

  • Batstone D.J. Pind P.F. & Angelidaki I. (2003). Kinetics of thermophilic anaerobic oxidation of straight and branched chain butyrate and valerate Biotechnology and Bioengineering 84 2 pp. 195-204.

  • Biernacki P. Steinigeweg S. Borchert A. & Uhlenhut F. (2013). Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for describing anaerobic digestion of grass maize green weed silage and industrial glycerine Bioresource Technology 127 pp. 188-194.

  • Boubaker F. & Ridha B.C. (2008). Modelling of the mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater with olive mill solid waste using anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) Bioresource Technology 99 pp. 6565-6577.

  • Daniels L. Hanson R.S. & Phillips J.A. (1994). Metabolism. Chemical analysis in: Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Gerhardt P. & Wood W.A. (Eds.) American Society for Microbiology Washington 1994.

  • Gilroyed B.H. Reuter T. Chu A. Hao X. Xu W. & McAllister T.A. (2010). Anaerobic digestion of specifi ed risk materials with cattle manure for biogas production Bioresource Technology 101 15 pp. 5780-5785.

  • Girault R. Bridoux G. Nauleau F. Poullain C. Buffet J. Steyer J.P. Sadowski A.G. & Béline F. (2012). A waste characterization procedure for ADM1 implementation based on degradation kinetics Water Research 46 13 pp. 4099-4110.

  • Girault R. Steyer J.P. Zaher U. Sadowski A.G. Nopens I. Béline F. Żak A. Kujawski O. Holm N.C. & Roenner- Holm S.G.E. (2010). Infl uent fractionation and parameter calibration for ADM1: Lab-scale and full-scale experiments. 2nd IWA/WEF Wastewater Treatment Modelling Seminar WWTmod Conference Proceedings Québec Canada 28-30 March 2010 pp. 171-182.

  • Koch K. Lübken M. Gehring T. Wichern M. & Horn H. (2010). Biogas from grass silage - Measurements and modeling with ADM1 Bioresource Technology 101 21 pp. 8158-8165.

  • Koch K. Wichern M. Lübken M. Horn H. (2009). Mono fermentation of grass silage by means of loop reactors Bioresource Technology 100 23 pp. 5934-5940.

  • Lübken M. Wichern M. Schlattmann M. Gronauer A. & Horn H. (2007). Modelling the energy balance of an anaerobic digester fed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops Water Research 41 18 pp. 4085-4096.

  • Lyseng B.C. Bergland W. Botheju D. Haugen F. & Bakke R. (2012). Biogas reactor modelling with ADMI Telemark University College Porsgrunn 2012.

  • Myint M. Nirmalakhandan N. & Speece R.E. (2007). Anaerobic fermentation of cattle manure: Modeling of hydrolysis and acidogenesis Water Research 41 2 pp. 323-332.

  • PN-EN ISO 13906:2009. Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents.

  • Ramirez I. Mottet A. Carrère H. Déléris S. Vedrenne F. & Steyer J.P. (2009). Modifi ed ADM1 disintegration/hydrolysis structures for modeling batch thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thermally pretreated waste activated sludge Water Research 43 pp. 3479-3492.

  • Rosén C. & Jeppsson U. (2006). Aspects on ADM1 implementation within the BSM2 framework. Tech. Report no. LUTEDX/ (TEIE-7224)/1-35/(2006). Department of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation Lund University Lund Sweden 2006.

  • Schön M. (2009). Numerical modelling of anaerobic digestion processes in agricultural biogas plants Dissertation.

  • Souza T.S.O. Carvajal A. Donoso-Bravo A. Peña M. & Fdz-Polanco F. (2013). ADM1 calibration using BMP tests for modeling the effect of autohydrolysis pretreatment on the performance of continuous sludge digesters Water Research 47 pp. 3244-3254.

  • Wett B. Schoen M. Phothilangka P. Wackerle F. & Insam H. (2006). Model based design of an agricultural biogas plant - application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for an improved chamber scheme. 7th International symposium on waste management problems in agro-industries Amsterdam 27-29 September 2006.

  • Wichern M. Gehring T. Fischer K. Andrade D. Lübken M. Koch K. Gronauer A. & Horn H. (2009). Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: Measurements and mathematical modeling with ADM1 Bioresource Technology 100 4 pp. 1675-1681.

  • Zhou H. Löffler D. & Kranert M. (2011). Model-based predictions of anaerobic digestion of agricultural substrates for biogas production Bioresource Technology 102 pp. 10819-10828.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.708
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.835

CiteScore 2018: 1.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.489
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.011

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 287 118 2
PDF Downloads 118 52 3