Utilization of environmetric & index methods as water quality comparative assessment tools focusing on heavy metal content

Open access

Abstract

In the study suitability of water quality index approach and environmetric methods in fi ngerprinting heavy metal pollution as well as comparison of spatial variability of multiple contaminants in surface water were assessed in the case of The Gediz River Basin, Turkey. Water quality variables were categorized into two classes using factor and cluster analysis. Furthermore, soil contamination index was adapted to water pollution index and used to fi nd out the relative relationship between the reference standards and the current situation of heavy metal contamination in water. Results revealed that surface water heavy metal content was mainly governed by metal processing, textile and tannery industries in the region. On the other hand, metal processing industry discharges mainly degraded quality of water in Kemalpasa and Menemen. Furthermore, Kemalpasa region has been heavily affected from tannery and textile industries effl uents. Moreover, pollution parameters have not been infl uenced by changes in physical factors (discharge and temperature). This study indicated the effectiveness of water quality index approach and statistical tools in fi ngerprinting of pollution and comparative assessment of water quality. Both methods can assist decision makers to determine priorities in management practices.

[1] Aktar Md.W, M. Paramasivam, M. Ganguly, S. Purkait, D. Sengupta: Assessment and occurrence ofvarious heavy metals in surface water of Ganga river around Kolkata: A study for toxicity and ecologicalimpact, Environ Monit Assess, 160, 207-213 (2010).

[2] Ameh E.G, F.A. Akpah: Heavy metal pollution indexing and multivariate statistical evaluation of hydrogeochemistryof River PovPov in Itakpe Iron-Ore mining area, Kogi State, Nigeria, Advances in Applied Science Research, 2 (1): 33-46 (2011).

[3] American Public Health Association-APHA: Standart methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edition (2005).

[4] Bhuiyan M.A.H, N.I. Suruvi, S.B. Dampare, M.A. Islam, S.B. Quraishi, S. Ganyaglo, S. Suzuki: Investigationof the possible sources of heavy metal contamination in lagoon and canal water in the tanneryindustrial area in Dhaka, Bangladesh, Environ Monit Assess., 175, 633-649 (2011).

[5] Brown R.M., N.I. McClelland, R.A. Deininger, R.G. Tozer: A water quality index - do we dare?, Water and Sewage Works, October, 339-343 (1970).

[6] Calheiros C.S.C, A.O.S.S. Rangel, M.L.P. Castro: The effects of tannery wastewater on the developmentof different plant species and chromium accumulation in Phragmites australis, Arch. Environ. Contam., 55 (3), 404-414 (2008).

[7] Cude C.G.: Oregon Water Quality Index: A tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37 (1), 125-137 (2001).

[8] Daraigan S.G., A.S. Wahdain, A.S. BaMosa, M.H. Obid: Linear correlation analysis study of drinkingwater quality data for AlMukalla City, Hadhramout, Yemen, International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1 (7), 1692-1701 (2011).

[9] DeCoster J.: Overview of Factor Analysis, Retrieved November 12 2011 from http://www.stat-help.com/ notes.html (1998).

[10] Edet A.E, O.E. Offi ong: Evaluation of water quality pollution indices for heavy metal contaminationmonitoring. A study case from Akpabuyo-Odukpani area, Lower Cross River Basin (southeastern Nigeria), GeoJournal, 57, 295-304 (2002).

[11] Gowd S.S, P.K. Govil: Distribution of heavy metals in surface water of Ranipet industrial area in TamilNadu, India, Environ Monit Assess., 136, 197-207 (2008).

[12] Guo G.L, Q.X. Zhou: Evaluation of heavy metal contamination in Phaeozem of northeast China, Environmental Geochemistry and Health., 28, 331-340 (2006).

[13] Halimoon N., R.G.S. Yin: Removal of Heavy Metals from Textile Wastewater using Zeolite, Environment Asia, 3 (special issue), 124-130 (2010).

[14] Hill T., P. Lewicki: Statistics:Methods and applications, StatSoft, Tulsa, 2006.

[15] Mihailov G, V. Simeonov, N. Nikolov, G. Mirinchev: Environmetric approaches to estimate pollutionimpacts on a coastal area by sediment and river water studies, Water Science and Technology, 46 (8), 45-52 (2002).

[16] Ministry of Environment and Forestry-MoEF: The study on Gediz Basin Protection and Action Plan, 2008.

[17] Official Gazette: Turkish water pollution control regulation, Dated 31.12.2004, Numbered: 25687.

[18] Prasad B., J.M. Bose: Evaluation of the heavy metal pollution index for surface and spring water neara limestone mining area of the lower Himalayas, Environmental Geology, 41, 183-188 (2001).

[19] Ramakrishnaiah C.R, C. Sadashivaiah, G. Ranganna: Assessment of Water Quality Index for the Groundwaterin Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India, E-Journal of Chemistry, 6 (2), 523-530 (2009).

[20] Reza R., G. Singh: Heavy metal contamination and its indexing approach for river water, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (4), 785-79 (2010).

[21] USGS, U.S. Department of the Interior - U.S. Geological Survey, Mercury Contamination of Aquatic Ecosystems. Fact Sheet FS-216-95, 2011. Accesed on http://water.usgs.gov/wid/FS_216-95/FS_216-95.pdf

[22] Wase J., C.F. Forster: Biosorbents for metal ions, Taylor & Francis, London, 1997.

[23] WEF Water Environment Federation: Industrial wastewater management treatment and disposal, 2008.

[24] Zeng X., T.C. Rasmussen: Multivariate Statistical Characterization of Water Quality in Lake Lanier,Georgia, USA, J. Environ. Qual., 34, 1980-1991 (2005).

Archives of Environmental Protection

The Journal of Institute of Environmental Engineering and Committee of Environmental Engineering of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.708
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.835

CiteScore 2017: 1.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.371
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.737

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 143 140 6
PDF Downloads 54 53 2