Flux-weakening control methods for hybrid excitation synchronous motor

Open access


The hybrid excitation synchronous motor (HESM), which aim at combining the advantages of permanent magnet motor and wound excitation motor, have the characteristics of low-speed high-torque hill climbing and wide speed range. Firstly, a new kind of HESM is presented in the paper, and its structure and mathematical model are illustrated. Then, based on a space voltage vector control, a novel flux-weakening method for speed adjustment in the high speed region is presented. The unique feature of the proposed control method is that the HESM driving system keeps the q-axis back-EMF components invariable during the flux-weakening operation process. Moreover, a copper loss minimization algorithm is adopted to reduce the copper loss of the HESM in the high speed region. Lastly, the proposed method is validated by the simulation and the experimental results.

[1] May H., Palka R., Paplicki P. et al., Modified concept of permanent magnet excited synchronous machines with improved high-speed features. Archives of Electrical Engineering 60(4): 531-540 (2011).

[2] Di B.P., Mognaschi M.E., Palka R. et al., Design optimization of a permanent-magnet excited synchronous machine for electrical automobiles. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 39(1): 889-895 (2012).

[3] Yang C.F., Lin H.Y., Guo J., Zhu Z.Q., Design and analysis of a novel hybrid excitation synchronous machine with asymmetrically stagger permanent magnet. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 44(11): 4353-4356 (2008).

[4] Chan C.C., Chau K.T., Jiang J.Z. et al., Novel permanent magnet motor drives for electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 43(2): 331-339 (1996).

[5] Liu X.P., Chen D., Yi L. Zhang C., Wang M., Comparison and analysis of magnetic-geared permanent magnet electrical machine at no-load. Archives of Electrical Engineering 63(4): 683-692 (2014).

[6] Chen J.J., Chin K.P., Minimum copper loss flux weakening control of surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 18(4): 929-936 (2003).

[7] Lawler J.S., Bailey J., McKeever J., Minimum current magnitude control of surface PM synchronous machines during constant power operation. IEEE Power Electronics Letters 3(2): 53-56 (2005).

[8] Fuchs E.F., Myat M.H., Speed and torque range increases of electric drives through compensation of flux weakening. International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, Pisa, Italy, SPEEDAM: 1569-1574 (2010).

[9] Chen J.J., Chin K.P., Automatic flux-weakening control of permanent magnet synchronous motors using a reduced-order controller. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 15(5): 881-890 (2000).

[10] Chan C.C., Zhang R., Chau K.T., Optimal efficiency control of PM hybrid motor drives for electrical vehicles. Power Electronics Specialists Conference, St. Louis, USA, pp. 363-368 (1997).

[11] Shinnaka S., New dynamic mathematical model and new dynamic vector simulators of hybrid-field synchronous motors. IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, San Antonio, TX, USA, pp. 882-889 (2005).

[12] Shinnaka S., New optimal current control methods for energy-efficient and wide speed-range operation of hybrid-field synchronous motor. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics 54(5): 2443-2450 (2007).

[13] Wang W.J., Zhang Z.R., Maximum torque control of hybrid excitation synchronous machine drives based on field current self-optimizing method. IECON Proceedings: 2977-2982 (2013).

[14] Capponi, F.G., Borocci G., Donato D., Caricchi, F. Flux Regulation Strategies for Hybrid Excitation Synchronous Machines. Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2014 IEEE: 4858-4865 (2014).

[15] Kong L., Wen X.H., Fan T., A New Method to Plan the Optimal Field Excitation Current Trajectory in a Hybrid Excitation Machine. 2011 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems: 1-4 (2011).

Archives of Electrical Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.238
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.535

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 87 87 10
PDF Downloads 53 53 11