A reassessment of local government’s financial position and performance: The case of Ireland

Gerard Turley 1 , Rémi Di medio 1  and Stephen McNena 1
  • 1 J. E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, and Whitaker Institute for Innovation and Societal Change, , Ireland


Given the changes in the Irish economy since the economic crisis and, more specifically, reforms in the local government sector, this paper reassesses the financial position and fiscal sustainability of local authorities in Ireland. To do this we employ a local government financial performance framework that measures liquidity and solvency, but also operating performance and collection rates, for different sources of revenue income. Using financial data sourced from local council income and expenditure accounts and balance sheets, we report and analyse the financial position and performance during the 2007–17 period. The results indicate an improvement in the financial performance of local councils since the early 2010s. Cross-council differences persist, in particular, between large urban local authorities and smaller rural local authorities, albeit only for the liquidity and operating performance measures. Among the small rural councils, Sligo County Council’s financial position, although improving, remains a serious matter with ongoing consultation with and monitoring by central government. To help improve the measurement of local authority financial performance we recommend inclusion of this framework in the local authority Annual Financial Statement and also in the Performance Indicator Report with a view to making financial reports more accessible and transparent to citizens and taxpayers and, ultimately, to help improve performance and service delivery by the local authorities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bahl. R. (1999). Implementation rules for fiscal decentralisation. International Studies Progam working paper no. 99-1. Atlanta, Georgia: Georgia State University Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.

  • Bird, R. M., & Vaillancourt, F. (eds) (2006). Perspectives on fiscal federalism. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

  • Carmeli, A. (2002). A conceptual and practical framework of measuring performance of local authorities in financial terms: Analysing the case of Israel. Local Government Studies, 28 (1), 21–36.

  • CSO. (2016). Census of population 2016 results. Cork: CSO.

  • Department of Finance. (2014). Medium term budgetary framework. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. (2015). Sligo county council financial plan 20152019. Obtained through Freedom of Information request. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. (2018). An overview of commercial rates in local authorities. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. (various years). Annual financial statements. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. (various years). Statutory audit reports. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • GeoDirectory. (2018). GeoView commercial vacancy rates report. Dublin: GeoDirectory.

  • Grant Thornton. (2012). Sligo County Council. Independent financial appraisal of Sligo County Council. August. Dublin: Grant Thornton.

  • Groves, S. M., Godsey, M., & Shulman, M. A. (1981). Financial indicators for local government. Public Budgeting & Finance, 1 (2), 5–19.

  • Groves, S. M., Godsey Valente, M., & Nollenberger, K. (2003). Evaluating financial condition: A handbook of local government (3rd edn). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.

  • Local Government Benchmarking Framework. (2020). National benchmarking overview report 201819. Scotland: The Improvement Service.

  • Mill, J. S. (1910). Utilitarianism, liberty and representative government. London: Dent.

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • National Audit Office. (2018). Financial sustainability of local authorities 2018. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: National Audit Office.

  • NOAC. (2016). Financial performance and local authorities 2013–2015, deficits, audit opinion and financial statements. Dublin: NOAC.

  • NOAC. (2018). Local authority performance indicator report 2017. Dublin: NOAC.

  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349–73.

  • Plekhanov, A., & Singh, R. (2007). How should subnational government borrowing be regulated? Some cross-country empirical evidence. IMF Staff Papers, 53 (3), 426–52.

  • Robbins, G., Turley, G., & McNena, S. (2014). From boom to bust? The financial performance of city and county councils. Administration, 62 (1), 119–51.

  • Schwab, C., Bouckaert, G., & Kuhlmann, S. (eds) (2017). The future of local government in Europe. Lessons from research and practice in 31 countries. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Shannon, L., O’Riordan, J., & Boyle, R. (2019). Furthering citizen engagement in local authority budgetary processes through participatory budgeting in Ireland. IPA Local Government Research Series No. 15. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5), 416–24.

  • Turley, G., McDonagh, J., McNena, S., & Grzedzinski, A. (2018). Optimum territorial reforms in local government: An economic analysis of scale economies in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 49 (4), 463–88.

  • Turley, G., & McNena, S. (2016). An analysis of local public finances and the 2014 local government reforms. The Economic and Social Review, 47 (2), 299–326.

  • Turley, G., Robbins, G., & McNena, S. (2015). A framework to measure the financial performance of local governments. Local Government Studies, 41 (3), 401–20.

  • Weingast, B. R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law and Economic Organisation, 11, 1–31.


Journal + Issues