[Barry, U. (2014). Gender perspective on the economic crisis: Ireland in an EU context. Gender, Sexuality & Feminism, 1, 82–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Betzelt, S., & Bothfeld, S. (2011). Incoherent strategies – Fragmented outcomes: Raising women’s employment rate in Germany. German Policy Studies, 7, 73–106.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crouch, C. (2015). Can the European Union abandon social policy? Paper presented at UCD Society of Politics and International Relations ‘Understanding the Eurozone Crisis’ Seminar Series, November.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics, 19, 1–23.10.1093/sp/jxr002]Search in Google Scholar
[Government Offices of Sweden. (2006). Moving ahead: Gender budgeting in Sweden. Stockholm: Ministry of Integration and Gender Equality.]Search in Google Scholar
[Government of Iceland. (2011). Implementing gender budgeting: Three year plan. Reykjavík: Ministry of Finance.]Search in Google Scholar
[Government of Spain. (2014). Equal opportunities strategic plan, 2014–2016. Madrid: Institute for Women and Equal Opportunities under the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grown, C. (2010). Taxation and gender equality: A conceptual framework. In C. Grown & I. Valodia (Eds), Taxation and gender equity: A comparative analysis of direct and indirect taxes in developing and developed countries. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203852958]Search in Google Scholar
[Gualda, R., Jose, M., Aguilera Diaz, B., & Cirujano Campano, P. (2015). Progress in the Andalusian GRB Practice: Gender budgeting audits. Journal of Economic Policy, 31, 253–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammerschmid, G., & Grunwald, A. (2014). Einführung der wirkungsorientierten verwaltungssteuerung: Erfolge – potentiale – perspektiven [Introduction of results-based management control: Success, potential, perspectives]. Vienna: Federal Chancellery.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holvoet, N. (2006). Gender budgeting: Its usefulness in programme-based approaches to aid. Brussels: European Community Gender Helpdesk.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2016). Gender budgeting in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Hagan, A. (2015). Favourable conditions for the adoption and implementation of gender budgeting: Insights from comparative analysis. Politica Economica, 2, 233–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palier, B., & Thelen, K. (2010). Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 38, 119–48.10.1177/0032329209357888]Search in Google Scholar
[Quinn, S. (2009). Gender responsive budgeting practical implementation handbook. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quinn, S. (2013). Equality proofing the budget: Lessons from the experiences of gender budgeting. In A. Nolan, R. O’Connell & C. Harvey (Eds), Human rights and public finance: Budgets and the promotion of economic and social rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quinn, S. (2015). The national budget – Forbidden domain: Understanding Germany’s rejection of gender budgeting. Masters Thesis, University College Dublin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quinn, S. (2016). Europe: A survey of gender budgeting efforts [IMF Working Paper 16/155]. Washington, DC: IMF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Senate Department for Labor, Integration and Women. (2016). Budget 2016/2017. Berlin: Senate Department for Labor, Integration and Women.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharp, R. (2003). Budgeting for equity: Gender budget initiatives within a framework of performance oriented budgeting. New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloat, A. (2004). Legislating for equality: The implementation of the EU equality acquis in Central and Eastern Europe [No 8, Jean Monnet Working Papers]. Retrieved from www.jeanmonnetprogram.org [17 July 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Stotsky, J. (1996). Gender bias in tax systems. [IMF working paper 96/99]. Washington, DC: IMF.]Search in Google Scholar
