Reforming the Irish public service: A multiple streams perspective

Open access


Following the Irish general election of 2011, a new ministry emerged which sought to combine public expenditure, industrial relations and public sector reform. The creation of the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER) represented a major departure in Irish administrative history, not least because it introduced a new actor at the heart of Irish government, but also for the range of tasks with which it was endowed. This article provides an administrative reform context for the creation of DPER before examining its work across three domains: industrial relations, financial management reform and administrative reform. Drawing on Kingdon’s ‘multiple streams’ model of policy change, the article argues that reform efforts across all three were made possible by the ‘window of opportunity’ presented by the department’s creation and the coming together of problems, policies and politics in respect of public service reform.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bideleux R. (2011). Contrasting responses to the international economic crisis of 2008-2010 in the 11 CIS countries and in the 10 post-communist EU member countries. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (3-4) 338-63.

  • Boyle R. (2014). Public sector reform in Ireland: Views and experiences from senior executives [State of the Public Service Series Report no. 13]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

  • Cairney P. (2012) Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Coen D. & Roberts A. (2012). A new age of uncertainty. Governance 25 (1) 5-9.

  • Department of Finance. (2011). Reforming Ireland’s budgetary framework: A discussion document. Retrieved from [13 April 2017].

  • Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2011). Public service reform plan. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.

  • Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2014). Public service reform plan 2014-16. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.

  • Department of the Taoiseach. (2008). Transforming public services. Dublin: Department of the Taoiseach.

  • Dommett K. Hardiman N. & MacCarthaigh M. (2016). Reforming the Westminster model of agency governance: Britain and Ireland after the crisis. Governance 29 (4) 535-52.

  • Donovan D. & Murphy A. E. (2013). The fall of the Celtic tiger: Ireland and the euro debt crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Downes R. Kennedy F. & Nic Gearailt M. (2013). Ireland Stat - Government performance measurement. Administration 60 (3) 189-200.

  • European Commission. (2013). Fiscal frameworks in the European Union: Commission services country factsheets for the autumn 2013 peer review. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Government of Ireland. (2010). National recovery plan 2011-2014. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

  • Government of Ireland. (2011). Programme for government. Dublin: Department of the Taoiseach.

  • Hardiman N. & MacCarthaigh M. (2011) The un-politics of new public management in Ireland. In J.-M. Eymeri-Douzans & J. Pierre (Eds) Administrative reforms and democratic governance (pp. 55-67). London: Routledge.

  • Hardiman N. & MacCarthaigh M. (2016). State retrenchment and administrative reform in Ireland: Probing comparative policy paradigms. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hardiman N. MacCarthaigh M. & Scott C. (2014). The Irish State Administration Database. Retrieved from [28 December 2016].

  • Herweg N. Hu C. & Zohlnhöfer R. (2015). Straightening the three streams: Theorising extensions of the multiple streams framework. European Journal of Political Research 54 435-49.

  • John P. (2012). Analyzing public policy. Oxford: Routledge.

  • Kickert W. (2012). State responses to the fiscal crisis in Britain Germany and the Netherlands. Public Management Review 14 (3) 299-309.

  • Kingdon J. W. (1995). Agendas alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

  • Levine C. H. (1979). More on cutback management: Hard questions for hard times. Public Administration Review 39 (2) 179-83.

  • Lodge M. & Hood C. (2012). Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries. Governance 25 (1) 79-101.

  • MacCarthaigh M. (2014a). Agency termination in Ireland: Culls and bonfires or life after death? Public Administration 92 (4) 1017-37.

  • MacCarthaigh M. (2014b). Shared services in Ireland. In P. Laegreid K. Sarapuu L. H. Rykkja & T. Randma-Liiv Organizing for coordination in the public sector: Practices and lessons from 12 European countries (pp. 54-65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Nyberg P. (2011). Commission of Investigation into the Banking Sector in Ireland. Retrieved from [13 April 2017].

  • OECD. (2008). Ireland: Towards an integrated public service. Paris: OECD.

  • Peters B. G. (2011). Governance responses to the fiscal crisis - comparative perspectives. Public Money & Management 31 (1) 75-80.

  • Peters B. G. Pierre J. & Randma-Liiv T. (2011 March). Economic crisis public administration and governance. Do new problems require new solutions? Public Organization Review 13-28.

  • Pollitt C. (2010). Cuts and reforms. Public services as we move into a new era. Society and Economy 32 (1) 17-31.

  • Regling K. & Watson M. (2010). A preliminary report on the sources of Ireland’s banking crisis. Retrieved from’s%20Banking%20Crisis%2031%20May%202010.pdf [13 April 2017].

  • Shannon L. (2016). Local and regional bodies in Ireland 2012-16 [Local Government Research Series Report no. 12]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

  • Thynne I. (2011). Symposium introduction. The global financial crisis governance and institutional dynamics. Public Organization Review 11 1-12.

  • Whelan K. (2014). Ireland’s economic crisis: The good the bad and the ugly. Journal of Macroeconomics 39 (B) 424-40.

  • Wright R. (2010). Strengthening the capacity of the Department of Finance [Report of the Independent Review Panel]. Dublin: Department of Finance.

  • Zahariadis N. (2016). Delphic oracles: Ambiguity institutions and multiple streams. Policy Sciences 49 (3) 3-12.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 719 394 10
PDF Downloads 455 311 9