The aim of this study was to evaluate the mandibular morphometric measurements of male and female rabbits using three-dimensional digital model and real bone measurements. Ten (5 female, 5 male) rabbits with no bone deformities were used in the study. Three-dimensional models were produced from two-dimensional microcomputed tomography images of the rabbit’s mandible. Biometric data were obtained by using the same measuring points over both three-dimensional models and real bone samples. There was only a significant main effect of gender for the greatest length of the mandible, length from aboral border of the alveolus of third molar teeth to infradentale, length of the diastema, height of the vertical ramus (measured in projection), distance from the incisor to the oral border of mental foramen, distance from aboral border of mental foramen to caudal border of mandible, distance between retroalveolar foramen and caudal border of mandible. For these measurements, calculated data for females are significantly higher than the males (p<0.05). It was found to be statistically significant between methods only for the length of the cheek tooth row and height of the vertical ramus values (p<0.05). In this study, it was understood that 3D morphometric measurements for bone tissue could be used with accuracy and reliability especially in anatomy and orthodontics areas as an alternative to traditional measurements made with a digital caliper.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Martini L, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R: Sheep model in orthopedic research: A literature review. Comparative Med 2001, 51(4): 292-299.
2. Neyt JGV, Buckwalter JA, Carroll NC: Use of animal models in musculoskeletal research. Iowa Orthop J 1998, 18: 119-123.
3. Campillo VE, Langonnet S, Pierrefeu A, Chaux-Bodard AG: Anatomic and histological study of the rabbit mandible as an experimental model for wound healing and surgical therapies. Lab Anim 2014, 48(4): 273-277.
4. Akbulut Y, Demiraslan Y, Gürbüz İ, Aslan K: The effect of gender factor on the mandible morphometry in the New Zealand Rabbit. FÜ Sağ Bil Vet Derg 2014, 28(1): 15-18.
5. Monfared AL: Applied anatomy of the rabbit’s skull and its clinical application during regional anesthesia. Glob Vet 2013, 10(6): 653-657.
6. Salih QM: Morphological and morphometric study of the mandible in the local rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus). Iraqi J Vet Sci 2016, 40(1): 25-29.
7. El-Bialy T, El-Shamy I, Graber TM: Growth modification of the rabbit mandible using therapeutic ultrasound: Is it possible to enhance functional appliance results? Angle Orthod 2003, 73(6): 631-639.
8. Borie E, Calzzani R, Dias FJ, Fuentes R, Salamanca C: Morphometry of Rabbit anatomical regions used as experimental models in implantology and oral surgery. Biomed Res 2017, 28(12): 5468-5472.
9. Valdivia GI, Tallon WV, Carvalho LP, Lozano LV, Manzanares CMC: Mandible measurements and dental midline deviation after alveolar nerve transection in growing rabbits. Int J Morphol 2011, 29(1): 52-56.
10. Jiang Y, Zhao J, White DL, Genant HK: Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact 2000, 1: 45-51.
11. Estai M, Bunt S: Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat 2016, 208: 151-157.
12. Kim M, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC: Evaluation of accuracy of 3D reconstruction images using multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 2012, 42: 25-33.
13. Stull KE, Tise ML, Ali Z, Fowler DR: Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images. Forensic Sci Int 2014, 238: 133-140.
14. Viecilli R, Katona T, Roberts W: Optimization of µCT data processing for modelling of dental structures in orthodontic studies. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2007, 10(4): 257-263.
15. Driesch AVD: A Guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Pea body Museum Bulletin 1. Harward University, Massachusetts, 1976, 52-64.
16. Azer SA, Azer S: 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: A review of the quality of the literature. Health Professions Education 2016, 2: 80-98.
17. Murgitroyd E, Madurska M, Gozalez J, Watson A: 3D digital anatomy modelling -Practical or pretty? Surgeon 2015, 13: 177-180.
18. Özkadif S, Eken E: Contribution of virtual anatomic models to medical education. Atatü rk Ü niversitesi Vet Bil Derg 2015, 10(1): 46-54.