The main reasons for wildlife forensic research are animal poaching, illegal trade, and falsified game meat products. Small trace amounts, old and degraded materials present the most common samples in revealing criminal activities in this field. This is the reason why it is crucial to use adequate and reliable methods and samples to identify animal species killed outside the hunting season or species protected by law. In this study, different endpoint PCR and real-time PCR protocols were compared in the identification of three Cervidae species (Capreolus capreolus, Cervus elaphus, Dama dama) from old and damaged material found in an enclosed area where the animals were kept. From a total of 129 samples, end point PCR provided results for 119 samples, while real-time PCR was successful in all cases. Also, we created and tested a protocol for simultaneous analyses of different types of samples, which is of great importance as when the amplification is carried out simultaneously it is more cost efficient and speeds up the process.
1. Ogden R, Dawnay N, McEwing R: Wildlife DNA forensics-bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement. Endang Spec Res 2009, 9:179-195.
2. Alacs EA, Georges A, FitzSimmons NN, Robertson J: DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2010, 6:180-194.
3. Wilson-Wilde L: Wildlife crime: a global problem. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2010, 6:221-222.
4. Fajardo V, González I, López-Calleja I, Martín I, Rojas M, Hernández PE, García T, Martín R: Identifi cation of meats from Red deer (Cervus elaphus), Fallow deer (Dama dama) and Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) using polymerase chain reaction targeting specifi c sequences from the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Meat Sci 2007, 76:234-240.
5. Johnson R, Wilson-Wilde L, Linacre A: Current and future directions of DNA in wildlife forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2014, 10:1-11.
6. Kitpipit T, Thanakiatkrai P, Linacre A, Lapwong Y, Chotigeat W: Low-cost direct PCR for aged and processed wildlife sample analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet Supplement Series 2013, 4:71-72.
7. Fernandes CA, Ginja C, Pereira I, Tenreiro R, Bruford MW, Santos-Reis M: Species-specifi c mitochondrial DNA markers for identifi cation of non-invasive samples from sympatric carnivores in the Iberian Peninsula. Conserv Genet 2008, 9:681-690.
8. Iyengar A: Forensic DNA analysis for animal protection and biodiversity conservation: A review. J Nat Conserv 2013, 22:195-205.
9. Vucicevic M, Stevanovic J, Sekler M, Resanovic R, Stanimirovic Z: Istorijski pregled metoda determinacije pola ptica. Vet glas 2016, 70:145-158.
10. Davitkov D, Vucicevic M, Stevanovic J, Krstic V, Tomanovic S, Glavinic U, Stanimirovic Z: Clinical babesiosis and molecular identifi cation of Babesia canis and Babesia gibsoni infections in dogs from Serbia. Acta Vet Hung 2015, 63:199-208.
11. Davitkov D, Davitkov D, Vucicevic M, Glavinic U, Stevanovic J, Stanimirovic Z: Molecular detection and investigation od the presence of Dirofi lariosis causative agent in dogs on the territory of Belgrade. Vet glas 2016, 70:89-98.
12. Fajardo V, Gonzalez I, Lopez-Calleja I, Martin I, Hernandez EP, Garcia T, Martin R: PCRRFLP Authentication of Meats from Red Deer (Cervus elaphus), Fallow Deer (Dama dama), Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus), Cattle (Bos taurus), Sheep (Ovis aries), and Goat (Capra hircus). J Agric Food Chem 2006, 54:1144-1150.
13. Lorenzini R: DNA forensics and the poaching of wildlife in Italy: A case study. Forensic Sci Int 2005, 153:218-221.
14. Sin WM, Tam YK, Tsui SK, Ng CS, Mok CS, Ha WY: An integrated and validated DNAbased protocol developed to fi ght against commercial frauds - A case of fraudulent substitutions for deer products. DNA barcodes 2013, 27-34.
15. Fumagili L, Cabrita CJ, Castella V: Simultaneous identifi cation of multiple mammalian species from mixed forensic samples based on mtDNA control region length polymorphism. Forensic Sci Int Genet Supplement Series 2009, 2:302-303.
16. Bennett EL, Robinson JG: Importance of wildlife as a resource. In: Hunting of Wildlife in Tropical Forest, Implications for Biodiversity and Forest Peoples. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.; 2000, 1-3.
17. Ogden R, Linacre A: Wildlife forensic science: A review of genetic geographic origin assignment. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2015, 18:152-159.
18. Fajardo V, González I, Martín I, Rojas M, Hernández PE, García T, Martín R: Real-time PCR for detection and quantifi cation of red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama), and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in meat mixtures. Meat Sci 2008, 79:289-298.
19. Opel KL, Chung D, McCord BR: A Study of PCR Inhibition Mechanisms Using Real Time PCR. J Forensic Sci 2010, 55:25-33.
20. Galan M, Baltzinger C, Hewison MAJ, Cosson JF: Distinguishing red and roe deer using DNA extracted from hair samples and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Wildlife Soc B 2005, 33:204-211.
21. Heywood DM, Skinner R, Cornwell PA: Analysis of DNA in hair fi bers. J Cosmet Sci 2003, 54:21-27.
22. Alonso A, Martín P, Albarrán C, García P, García O, Fernández de Simón L, García- Hirschfeld Julia, Sancho M, De la Rúa C, Fernández-Piqueras J: Real-time PCR designs to estimate nuclear and mitochondrial DNA copy number in forensic and ancient DNA studies. Forensic Sci Int 2004, 139:141-149.
23. Huber S, Bruns U, Arnold W: Sex determination of red deer using polymerase chain reaction of DNA from feces. Wildlife Soc B 2002, 30:208-212.
24. Alaeddini R: Forensic implications of PCR inhibition - a review. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2012, 6:297-305.
25. Yoshii T, Tamura K, Taniguchi T, Akiyama K, Ishiyama I: Water-soluble eumelanin as a PCR-inhibitor and a simple method for its removal. Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi 1993, 47:323-329.
26. Eckhart L, Bach J, Ban J, Tschachler E: Melanin binds reversibly to thermostable DNA polymerase and inhibits its activity. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2000, 271:726-730.
27. Suenaga E, Nakamura H: Evaluation of three methods for effective extraction of DNA from human hair. J Chromatogr B 2005, 820:137-141.
28. Valasek MA, Repa JJ: The power of real-time PCR. Adv Physiol Ed 2005, 29:151-159.
29. Haas C, Klesser B, Maake C, Bär W, Kratzer A: mRNA profi ling for body fl uid identifi cation by reverse transcription endpoint PCR and real-time PCR. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2009, 3:80-88.
30. Pfeiffer I, Völkel I, Täubert H, Brenig B: Forensic DNA-typing of dog hair: DNAextraction and PCR amplifi cation. Forensic Sci Int 2004, 141:149-151.