This paper presents the software development meta-process (SD-MP) as a proposal to set up software projects. Within this proposal we offer conceptual elements that help solve the war of methodologies and processes in favor of an integrating viewpoint, where the main flaws associated with conventional and agile approaches are removed. Our newly developed software platform to support the meta-process is also presented together with three case studies involving projects currently in progress, where the framework proposed in SD-MP has been applied.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
 J. Osis and E. Asnina. “Is Modeling a Treatment for the Weakness of Software Engineering?” in Model-Driven Domain Analysis and Software Development: Architectures and Functions. IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 1–14, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-874-2.ch001
 P. Naur and B. Randell, Software engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO science committee, Scientific Affairs Division, NATO, Garmisch, Germany, November, 1968.
 S. McConnell, Rapid Development, Microsoft Press, 1996.
 J. Maeda, Las leyes de la simplicidad, Gedisa, 2008.
 R. W. Winston, Managing the development of large software systems: IEEE WESCON, July 22–26, 2002, Los Ángeles, USA, 1970.
 T. Clancy, “The Extreme Chaos,” Standish Group International Inc., 2012.
 R. L. Glass, “The Standish Report: does it really describe a software crisis?” Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 8 pp. 15–15, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1145287.1145301
 B. Boehm, “A spiral model of software development and enhancement,” Computer, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 61–72, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.59
 K. Forsberg and H. Mooz, “The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle,” National Council On System Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.1991.tb01484.x
 M. C. Paulk, C. V. Weber, B. Curtis and M. B. Chrissis, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Addison Wesley, 1994.
 P. B. Kruchten, The Rational Unified Process (An Introduction), Addison Wesley, 1999.
 U. Donins, J. Osis, A. Slihte, E. Asnina and B. Gulbis. Towards the Refinement of Topological Class Diagram as a Platform Independent Model: ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling-Driven Software Development, Portugal, pp. 79–88, 2011.
 J. Osis, E. Asnina and A. Grave, “Computation Independent Representation of the Problem Domain in MDA,” e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2008.
 K. Schwaber, Scrum Development Process: OOPSLA95 Business Object Design and Implementation Workshop, New York, USA. Springer, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 170–175, 1995.
 E. S. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, O’Reilly, 1999
 R. L. Glass, “Agile versus traditional: Make love not war,” Cutter IT Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 12–18, 2001.
 M. McCormick, “Technical opinion: Programming extremism,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 109–119, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/376134.376181
 H. Saiedian, “Panel: Extreme programming: helpful or harmful?” Proceedings. International Conference on Software Engineering, Washington, USA. IEEE Computer Society, p. 718, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icse.2003.1201258
 S. Chatterjee, “The waterfall that won’t go away,” SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–10, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1668862.1668875
 S. R. Rakitin, “Manifesto elicits cynicism,” Computer, vol. 34, pp. 4–7, 2001.
 J. Nandhakumar and D. E. Avison, “The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development,” Information Technology & People, vol. 12, pp. 176–191, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09593849910267224
 D. Truex, R. Baskerville and J. Travis, “Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods, Accounting,” Management and Information Technologies, vol. 10, pp. 53–79, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(99)00009-0
 W. Hesse, “Dinosaur meets archaeopteryx? or: Is there an alternative for rational unified process?” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 2, pp. 240–247, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0033-y
 D. D. McCracken and M. A. Jackson, “Life cycle concept considered harmful,” SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–32, 1982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1005937.1005943
 C. Andersen, El traje Nuevo del emperador, La galera, 2009.
 N. B. Ruparelia, “Software development lifecycle models,” SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 8–13, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1764810.1764814
 R. Hoda, P. Kruchten, J. Noble and S. Marshall, “Agility in context,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 74–88, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1932682.1869467
 E. A. Abbott, Flatland: A romance of many dimensions, John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, 1885.
 L. Wang, “Agility counts in developing small-size software,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16–23, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2007.906114
 K. Sureshchandra and J. Shrinivasavadhani, “Moving from waterfall to agile,” in Agile Conf., AGILE '08., Toronto, USA, IEEE, 2008, pp. 97–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/agile.2008.49
 T. Khne, “Matters of (meta-) modeling,” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 5, pp. 369–385, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-006-0017-9
 J. Strick, “Darwinism and the origin of life: The role of H. C. Bastian in the British spontaneous generation debates,” Journal of the History of Biolog, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1868–1873, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004460408116
 P. Clarke and R. V. O’Connor, “The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 433–447, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.003
 J. C. Derniame, B. A. Kaba and D. Wastell, Software process: principles, methodology, and technology, Springer-Verlag, 1999.
 E. Asnina and J. Osis, “Topological Functioning Model as a CIM-Business Model,” in Model-Driven Domain Analysis and Software Development: Architectures and Functions. IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 40–64, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-874-2.ch003
 J. Sanders, “Spice: New directions in software process assessment,” in Proc. of Quality and Productivity in Software Development Conf., University of Iceland, 1970.
 M. Suula, T. Makinen and T. Varkoi, “An approach to characterize a software process,” in Int. Conf. on Management of Engineering & Technology, PICMET '09. IEEE, pp. 1003–1109, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2009.5262007
 J. E. Gibson, “Cause and effect analysis: “power tool” for total quality,” Electrical Electronics Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing & Coil Winding Conference, EEIC/ICWA, Chicago, USA, pp. 751–753, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EEIC.1993.631320
 E. Asnina and J. Osis, “Computation Independent Models: Bridging Problem and Solution Domains,” in ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling Theory-Driven Development, Portugal, pp. 23–32, 2010.
 F. Woo, R. Mikusauskas, D. Bartlett and R. Law, “A framework for the effective adoption of software development methodologies,” in ACMSE Proc. of the 44th Annual Southeast Regional Conf., New York, USA, ACM, pp. 198–203, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1185448.1185493
 E. Germain and P. N. Robillard, “Engineering-based processes and agile methodologies for software development: a comparative case study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 75, no. 1–2, pp. 17–27, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.02.022
 F. Garca, M. Piattini, F. Ruiz, G. Canfora and C. A. Visaggio, “FMESP: Framework for the modeling and evaluation of software processes,” Journal of Systems Architecture, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 627–639, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2006.06.007
 C. Gonzalez-Perez and B. Henderson-Sellers, “Modelling software development methodologies: A conceptual foundation,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1778–1796, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.048
 F. Brooks, The Mythical Man – Month, Addison Wesley, 1995.
 S. Dakhli and M. Ben Chouikha, “The knowledge-gap reduction in software engineering,” in Third Int. Conf. on Research Challenges in Information Science, Fez, USA, IEEE, pp. 287–294, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2009.5089292
 M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.
 M. Shaw and D. Garlan, Software Architecture, Prentice Hall, 1996.
 C. Atkinson and T. Kuhne, “Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation,” IEEE Software, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 36–41, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2003.1231149
 S. J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Antipatterns: A Compendium of Bad Practices in Software Development Processes,” in Int. J. of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 41–46, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2011.147
 S.J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo, and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Patterns of Software Development Process,” Int. J. of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 33–40, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2011.146
 S. J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Patterns of Software Development Process,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 818–824, 2014.
 A. Slihte, J. Osis and U. Donins, “Knowledge Integration for Domain Modeling,” in ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling-Driven Software Development, Portugal, pp. 46–56, 2011.
 J. Osis and A. Slihte, “Transforming Textual Use Cases to a Computation Independent Model,” in ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling Theory-Driven Development, Portugal, pp. 33–42, 2010.
 J. Osis and U. Donins, “Formalization of the UML Class Diagrams,” Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 180–192, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14819-4_13