Thermoreversible mucoadhesive ophthalmic in situ hydrogel: Design and optimization using a combination of polymers

Open access

Thermoreversible mucoadhesive ophthalmic in situ hydrogel: Design and optimization using a combination of polymers

The purpose of the study was to develop an optimized thermoreversible in situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system based on Pluronic F 127, containing moxifloxacin hydrochloride as a model drug. A 32 full factorial design was employed with two polymers: Pluronic F 68 and Gelrite as independent variables used in combination with Pluronic F 127. Gelation temperature, gel strength, bioadhesion force, viscosity and in vitro drug release after 1 and 10 h were selected as dependent variables. Pluronic F 68 loading with Pluronic F 127 was found to have a significant effect on gelation temperature of the formulation and to be of importance for gel formation at temperatures 33-36 °C. Gelrite loading showed a positive effect on bioadhesion force and gel strength and was also found helpful in controling the release rate of the drug. The quadratic mathematical model developed is applicable to predicting formulations with desired gelation temperature, gel strength, bioadhesion force and drug release properties.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • A. K. Mitra Ophthalmic Drug Delivery System Vol. 58 Marcel Dekker New York 1993 pp. 105-110.

  • A. G. Kaur P. Indu K. S. Anil and A. Deepika Vesicular systems in ocular drug delivery. An overview Int. J. Pharm. 269 (2004) 1-14; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.09.016.

  • C. L. Bourlais L. Acar H. Zia P. A. Sado T. Needham and R. Leverge Ophthalmic drug delivery systems - recent advances Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 77 (1998) 33-58.

  • M. Paulsson H. Hagerstrom and K. Edsman Rheological studies of the gelation of deacetylated gellan gum (Gelrite) in physiological conditions Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 9 (1999) 99-105; DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(99)00051-2.

  • D. J. Biedenbach and R. N. Jones The comparative antimicrobial activity of levofloxacin tested against 350 clinical isolates of Streptococci Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25 (1996) 47-51; DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(96)00066-1.

  • K. Edsman J. Carlfors and R. Peterson Rheological evaluation of Poloxamer as in situ gel for ophthalmic use Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 6 (1998) 105-112; DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(97)00075-4.

  • I. R. Schmolka. A review of block polymer surfactants J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 54 (1977) 110-116; DOI: 10.1007/BF02894385.

  • S. Khan D. S. Singhara and P. G. Yeole Temperature induced in situ gel of lidocaine hydrochloride for periodontal anesthesia Indian Drugs 42 (2005) 519-524.

  • J. C. Gilbert J. L. Richardson M. C. Davies K. J. Palin and J. Hadgraft The effect of solutes and polymers on the gelation properties of Pluronic F127 solutions for controlled drug delivery J. Control. Rel. 5 (1987) 113-118; DOI: 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90002-2.

  • J. Balasubramaniam S. Kant and J. K. Pandit In vitro and in vivo evaluation of Gelrite® gellan gum based ocular delivery system of indomethacin Acta Pharm. 53 (2003) 251-261.

  • H. G. Choi J. H. Jung J. M. Ryu S. J. Yoon Y. K. Oh and C. K. Kim Development of in situ-gelling and mucoadhesive acetaminophen liquid suppository Int. J. Pharm. 165 (1998) 33-44; DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(97)00386-4.

  • C. Puglia F. Bonina G. Trapani M. Franco and M. Ricci Evaluation of in vitro percutaneous absorption of lorazepam and clonazepam from hydro-alcoholic gel formulations Int. J. Pharm. 228 (2001) 79-87; DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)0806-7.

  • R. W. Korsmeyer R. Gurny E. Doelker P. Buri and N. A. Peppas Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers Int. J. Pharm. 15 (1983) 25-35.

  • P. Costa and J. M. S. Lobo Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 13 (2001) 123-133; DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00095-1.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.405
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.701

CiteScore 2018: 1.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.314
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.637

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 385 230 5
PDF Downloads 153 112 4