Application Of The Work Breakdown Structure In Determining Cost Buffers In Construction Schedules

Open access

Abstract

The paper presents methods of determining the location of cost buffers and corresponding contingency costs in the CPM schedule based on its work breakdown structure. Application of correctly located cost buffers with appropriately established reserve costs is justified by the common overrunning of scheduled costs in construction projects. Interpolated cost buffers (CB) as separate tasks have been combined with relevant summary tasks by the start–to–start (SS) relationship, whereas the time of their execution has been dynamically connected with the time of accomplishment of particular summary tasks using the “paste connection” option. Besides cost buffers linked with the group of tasks assigned to summary tasks, a definition of the cost buffer for the entire project (PCB) has been proposed, i.e. as one initial task of the entire project. Contingency costs corresponding to these buffers, depending on the data that the planner has at his disposal, can be determined using different methods, but always depend on the costs of all tasks protected by each buffer. The paper presents an exemplary schedule for a facility and the method of determining locations and cost for buffers CB and PCB, as well as their influence on the course of the curve illustrating the budgeted cost of work scheduled (BCWS). The proposed solution has been adjusted and presented with consideration of the possibilities created by the scheduling software MS Project, though its general assumptions may be implemented with application of other similar specialist tools.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. H. Kerzner Project management. A systems approach to planning scheduling and controlling Van Nostrand Reinhold New York 1984.

  • 2. D. Y. Kim S. H. Han H. Kim H. Park Structuring the prediction model of project performance for international construction projects: A comparative analysis Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2) (2009) 1961–1971.

  • 3. A. Czarnigowska A. Sobotka Time–cost relationship for predicting construction duration Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 13 (4) (2013) 518-526.

  • 4. M. M. Fouladgar A. Yazdani-Chamzini E. K. Zavadskas Risk evaluation of tunneling projects Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 12 (1) (2012) 1-12.

  • 5. O. Kapliński Some aspects of risk management in construction industry Strategie zarządzania ryzykiem w przedsiębiorstwie – formułowanie i implementacja strategii reakcji na ryzyko red. J. Bizon-Górecka Bydgoszcz (2000) 59-69 (in Polish).

  • 6. O. Kapliński Methods and models of research in building engineering Wydawnictwo PAN KILiW IPPT Warszawa 2007 (in Polish).

  • 7. O. Kapliński Planning instruments in construction management Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14 (4) (2008) 449-451.

  • 8. D. Skorupka The method of identification and quantification of construction project risk Archives of Civil Engineering LI (4) (2005) 647-662.

  • 9. D. Kuchta D. Skorupka Project risk management taking into consideration the influence of various risk levels based on linguistic approach. World Scientific Proc. Series on Computer Engineering and Information Science 7; Uncertainty Modeling in Knowledge Engineering and Decision Making - Proceedings of the 10th International FLINS Conf 7 (2012) 1093-1098.

  • 10. M. Połoński K. Pruszyński The time buffers location and critical chain concepts in civil engineering network schedule Part I Theoretical background Przegląd Budowlany 2 (2008) 45–49 (in Polish).

  • 11. M. Połoński K. Pruszyński The time buffers location and critical chain concepts in civil engineering network schedule Part II Practical application Przegląd Budowlany 3 (2008) 55–62 (in Polish).

  • 12. M.B. Woolf Faster Construction Projects With CPM Scheduling Mcgraw-hill Professional Publishing 2007.

  • 13. Goldratt E. M. Critical Chain The North River Press P.O. Box 567 1997.

  • 14. H. Steyn An investigation into the fundamentals of critical chain project scheduling International Journal of Project Management 19 (2000) 363-369.

  • 15. B. Flyvbjerg M.S. Holm S. Buhl Underestimating Costs in Public Works Error or Lie? American Planning Association Journal 68 (3) (2002) 279-295.

  • 16. B. Flyvbjerg N. Bruzelius W. Rothengatter Megaprojects and Risk. An Anatomy of Ambition Cambridge University Press 2003.

  • 17. J. Reilly M. McBride D. Sangrey D. MacDonald & J. Brown The development of CEVP® - WSDOT’s Cost-Risk Estimating Process Proceedings Boston Society of Civil Engineers http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/projectmgmt/riskassessment 2004.

  • 18. M. Połoński The analysis of the reliability of realization costs and investment’s time limits in Warsaw Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities Topic Civil Engineering 9 (4) (2006) http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume9/issue4/art-10.html.

  • 19. Guide to Building Construction Duration Building Cost Information Service London 2004.

  • 20. M. Połoński Construction project budgeting including time buffers and costs Proceedings of 60 konferencja naukowa Komitetu Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN oraz Komitetu Nauki PZITB Krynica 14-19 września 2014 r (in Polish in press).

  • 21. R. Marcinkowski Workbreakdown Structure (WBS) for bilding performance planning Proceedings of Konferencji Naukowo-Technicznej Inżynieria Przedsięwzięć Budowlanych Wisła 2009 Katedra Procesów Budowlanych Politechnika Śląska Gliwice (2009) 221-228 (in Polish).

  • 22. D. Baccarini Estimating project cost contingency - a model and exploration of research questions in Khosrowshahi Farzad (ed) ARCOM 20th Annual Conference September Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh: Association of Researchers in Construction Management (2004) 105-113.

  • 23. M. Połoński A. Ziółkowska Editing costs in MS Project Archiwum Instytutu Inżynierii Lądowej 13 (2012) 277-284 (in Polish).

  • 24. M. Połoński A. Ziółkowska The effect of MS Project options on schedule update and EVM indicators calculation Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences 21 (3) (2012) 195-212 (in Polish).

  • 25. K Parzydło Control of construction cost using Earned Value Method on the selected engineering object (Master of Science dissertation) Warsaw University of Life Sciences 2010 (in Polish).

  • 26. F.K. Adams Construction Contract Risk Management A Study of Practices in the United Kingdom Cost Engineering 50 (1) (2008) 22-33.

  • 27. K. Nassar Cost Contingency Analysis for Construction Projects Using Spreadsheets Cost Engineering 44 (9) (2002) 26-31.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.80

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.304
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.866

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 880 603 31
PDF Downloads 523 366 23