Optimised Mix Design for Normal Strength and High Performance Concrete Using Particle Packing Method

Open access

Abstract

This paper presents the details of optimized mix design for normal strength and high performance concrete using particle packing method. A critical review of mix design methods have been carried out for normal strength concrete using American Concrete Institute (ACI) and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) methods highlighting the similarities and differences towards attaining a particular design compressive strength. Mix design for M30 and M40 grades of concrete have been carried out using ACI, BIS and particle packing methods. Optimization of concrete mix has been carried out by means of particle packing method using EMMA software, which employs modified Anderson curve to adjust the main proportions. Compressive strength is evaluated for the adjusted proportions and it is observed that the mixes designed by particle packing method estimates compressive strength closer to design compressive strength. Further, particle packing method has been employed to optimize the ingredients of high performance concrete and experiments have been carried out to check the design adequacy of the desired concrete compressive strength.

1. ACI Committe211, (reapproved in 2002), Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight and mass concrete, American Concrete Institute, USA, 1991.

2. V. Johansen, P.J. Andersen, Particle Packing and Concrete Properties, Materials Science of concrete 2, American Ceramics Society, Inc., Westerville, Ohio, 111-147, 1996.

3. P. Goltermann, V. Johansen, L. Palbol, Packing of aggregate an alternative tool to dertermine the optimal aggregate Mix, ACI Material Journal, 94, 5, 435-443, 1997.

4. M.R. Jones, L. Zheng, M.D. Newlands, Comparison of particle packing models for proportioning concrete constituents for minimum voids ratio, Material and Structures, 35, 5, 301-309, 2002.

5. W. Aiqin, Z. Chengzhi, Z. Ningsheng, Study of the influence of the particle size distribution on the properties of cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 29, 11, 685-695, 1997.

6. M. Santhanam, Using paticle packing approach towards reducing cement consumption in high performance concrete. ICI journal, 1, 4, 4-8, 2011.

7. S.H. Kosmatka, B. Kerkhoff, W.C. Panarese, Design and control of concrete mixtures, portland cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, USA , 2002.

8. SP: 23-1988, Handbook on concrete mixes, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 1983.

9. IS-10262, 2009, Indian standard concrete mix proportioning - Guidelines (First revision), Bureau of India Standard, New Delhi, India.

10. IS-10262:1982, Indian Standard, Recommended guidelines for concrete mix design, Reaffirmed 2004, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India.

11. H.C. Henry, Wong, K.H. Albert Kwan, Packing Density: A key concept for mix Design of high performance concrete, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

12. P. Domone, C. Hsi-Wen, Testing of binders for high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 27, 8, 1141-1147, 1997.

13. N.Q. Feng, Y.X. Shi, T.Y. Hao, Influence of ultra fine powder on the fluidity and strength of cement paste, Advances in cement Research, 12, 3, 89-95, 2000.

14. C.C. Furnas, Grading Aggregates: I. Ind. Eng. Chem., 23, 1052-58, 1931.

15. F.O. Anderegg, Grading Aggregates II. Ind. Eng. Chem., 23, 1058-64, 1931.

16. A.H.M. Andreasen, J. Andersen, Ueber die beziehung zwischen Kornabstufung und Zwischenraum in produkten aus losen Kornern(mit einigen Experimenten). Kolloid-Zeitschrift 50, 217-228, 1930.

17. A.K.H. Kwan, Use of condensed silica fume for making high strength, self consolidating concrete, Candian Journal of Civil Engineering, 27, 4, 620-627, 2000.

18. A.K.H. Kwan, C.F. Mora, Effects of various shape parameters on packing of aggregate particles. Magazine of concrete Research, 53, 2, 91-100, 2001.

Archives of Civil Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.251
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.521

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 158 158 80
PDF Downloads 77 77 23