Amino acids metabolism and degradation is regulated during porcine oviductal epithelial cells (OECs) primary culture in vitro – a signaling pathways activation approach

Open access

Abstract

The ovary is part of the reproductive system, possessing very important functions in the reproduction process (ovum and embryo transfer, providing a suitable environment for sperm capacitation, etc.). There are two types of cells in the fallopian tubes: alveolar and secretive cells. These study shows the metabolic processes in pig oviductal epithelial cells associated with the activation of signaling pathways of amino acids metabolism and degradation during long-term in vitro culture. Oviductal epithelial cells from 45 colonies in the anestrous phase of the estrous cycle have been utilized in this study. RNA extract from the OEC primary cultures was pooled after 24h, 7days, 15 days and 30 days from the beginning of culture and the transcriptome investigated by Affymetrix® Porcine Gene 1.1 ST. From the whole transcript that consisted of 2009 different genes, 1537 were upregulated and 995 were downregulated after 7 days of culture, 1471 were upregulated and 1061 were downregulated after 15 days of culture and 1329 were upregulated and 1203 were downregulated after 30 days of culture. The results of these studies provide, for the first time, information on the activation of metabolic pathways of amino acids such as valine, leucine, isoleucine, cysteine, and methionine in the investigated tissue. They also indicate genes that may be OECs-specific genetic markers that are expressed or upregulated during long-term in vitro culture.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Kranc W. et al. “The origin in vitro differentiation and stemness specificity of progenitor cells.” J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents vol. 31 no. 2 pp. 365-369 2017.

  • 2. Groth C. G. “The potential advantages of transplanting organs from pig to man: A transplant Surgeon’s view.” Indian J. Urol. vol. 23 no. 3 pp. 305-9 Jul. 2007.

  • 3. Denner J. “Xenotransplantation-Progress and Problems: A Review” J. Transplant. Technol. Res. vol. 4 no. 2 Jul. 2014.

  • 4. Kranc W. et al. “Molecular basis of growth proliferation and differentiation of mammalian follicular granulosa cells.” J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents vol. 31 no. 1 pp. 1-8 2017.

  • 5. Kempisty B. et al. “Association between progesterone and estradiol-17beta treatment and protein expression of pgr and PGRMC1 in porcine luminal epithelial cells: a real-time cell proliferation approach.” J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents vol. 29 no. 1 pp. 39-50.

  • 6. Bukowska D. et al. “Differential expression of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor beta isoforms in dog endometrium during different periods of the estrus cycle” Pol. J. Vet. Sci. vol. 14 no. 2 pp. 259-264 Jan. 2011.

  • 7. Ciesiółka S. et al. “Epithelialization and stromalization of porcine follicular granulosa cells during real-time proliferation – a primary cell culture approach.” J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents vol. 30 no. 3 pp. 693-702.

  • 8. Huang D. W. et al. “DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists.” Nucleic Acids Res. vol. 35 no. Web Server issue pp. W169-75 Jul. 2007.

  • 9. Luo W. and Brouwer C. “Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization” Bioinformatics vol. 29 no. 14 pp. 1830-1831 Jul. 2013.

  • 10. von Mering C. et al. “STRING: known and predicted protein-protein associations integrated and transferred across organisms” Nucleic Acids Res. vol. 33 no. Database issue pp. D433-D437 Dec. 2005.

  • 11. Pectasides D. Pectasides E. and Economopoulos T. “Fallopian tube carcinoma: a review.” Oncologist vol. 11 no. 8 pp. 902-12 Sep. 2006.

  • 12. Chen S. Einspanier R. and Schoen J. “Long-term culture of primary porcine oviduct epithelial cells: Validation of a comprehensive invitro model for reproductive science” Theriogenology 2013.

  • 13. Hunter R. H. F. “Oviduct function in pigs with particular reference to the pathological condition of polyspermy” Mol. Reprod. Dev. vol. 29 no. 4 pp. 385-391 Aug. 1991.

  • 14. Jansen R. P. S. Anderson J. C. and Sutherland P. D. “Nonoperative Embryo Transfer to the Fallopian Tube” N. Engl. J. Med. vol. 319 no. 5 pp. 288-291 Aug. 1988.

  • 15. Murray S. C. and Smith T. T. “Sperm interaction with fallopian tube apical membrane enhances sperm motility and delays capacitation” Fertil. Steril. vol. 68 no. 2 pp. 351-357 Aug. 1997.

  • 16. Joshi M. S. “Isolation cell culture and characterization of oviduct epithelial cells of the cow” Microsc. Res. Tech. vol. 31 no. 6 pp. 507-518 Aug. 1995.

  • 17. Joshi M. S. “Isolation cell culture and immunocytochemical characterization of oviduct epithelial cells of the cow.” J. Reprod. Fertil. vol. 83 no. 1 pp. 249-61 May 1988.

  • 18. Walter I. “Culture of bovine oviduct epithelial cells (BOEC)” Anat. Rec. vol. 243 no. 3 pp. 347-356 Nov. 1995.

  • 19. Aldarmahi A. “Establishment and characterization of female reproductive tract epithelial cell culture” J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. vol. 5 no. 2 pp. 105-110 Jun. 2017.

  • 20. Rottmayer R. et al. “A bovine oviduct epithelial cell suspension culture system suitable for studying embryo-maternal interactions: morphological and functional characterization.” Reproduction vol. 132 no. 4 pp. 637-48 Oct. 2006.

  • 21. Leese H. J. Tay J. I. Reischl J. and Downing S. J. “Formation of Fallopian tubal fluid: role of a neglected epithelium.” Reproduction vol. 121 no. 3 pp. 339-46 Mar. 2001.

  • 22. Abe H. and Oikawa T. “Observations by scanning electron microscopy of oviductal epithelial cells from cows at follicular and luteal phases” Anat. Rec. vol. 235 no. 3 pp. 399-410 Mar. 1993.

  • 23. Kress A. and Morson G. “Changes in the oviducal epithelium during the estrous cycle in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica.” J. Anat. vol. 211 no. 4 pp. 503-17 Oct. 2007.

  • 24. Huntar R. H. “Function and malfunction of the Fallopian tubes in relation to gametes embryos and hormones.” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. vol. 7 no. 4 pp. 267-83 1977.

  • 25. Kossowska-Tomaszczuk K. et al. “The Multipotency of Luteinizing Granulosa Cells Collected from Mature Ovarian Follicles” Stem Cells vol. 27 no. 1 pp. 210-219 Jan. 2009.

  • 26. Abe H. and Hoshi H. “Bovine oviductal epithelial cells: their cell culture and applications in studies for reproductive biology.” Cytotechnology vol. 23 no. 1-3 pp. 171-83 Jan. 1997.

  • 27. McGivan J. D. and Pastor-Anglada M. “Regulatory and molecular aspects of mammalian amino acid transport.” Biochem. J. vol. 299 (Pt 2) no. Pt 2 pp. 321-34 Apr. 1994.

  • 28. Finkelstein J. D. Martin J. J. and Harris B. J. “Methionine metabolism in mammals. The methionine-sparing effect of cystine.” J. Biol. Chem. vol. 263 no. 24 pp. 11750-4 Aug. 1988.

  • 29. Stadtman E. R. Van Remmen H. Richardson A. Wehr N. B. and Levine R. L. “Methionine oxidation and aging” Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Proteins Proteomics vol. 1703 no. 2 pp. 135-140 Jan. 2005.

  • 30. Zhang S. Zeng X. Ren M. Mao X. and Qiao S. “Novel metabolic and physiological functions of branched chain amino acids: a review.” J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. vol. 8 p. 10 2017.

  • 31. Wolfe R. R. “Branched-chain amino acids and muscle protein synthesis in humans: myth or reality?” J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. vol. 14 p. 30 2017.

  • 32. Abe H. et al. “Cloning and sequence analysis of a full length cDNA encoding human mitochodrial 3-oxoacyl-CoA thiolase” Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Gene Struct. Expr. vol. 1216 no. 2 pp. 304-306 Nov. 1993.

  • 33. Harris R. A. et al. “Regulation of the branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase and elucidation of a molecular basis for maple syrup urine disease.” Adv. Enzyme Regul. vol. 30 pp. 245-63 1990.

  • 34. Wynn R. M. et al. “Molecular Mechanism for Regulation of the Human Mitochondrial Branched-Chain α-Ketoacid Dehydrogenase Complex by Phosphorylation” Structure vol. 12 no. 12 pp. 2185-2196 Dec. 2004.

  • 35. Shafqat N. et al. “A structural mapping of mutations causing succinyl-CoA:3-ketoacid CoA transferase (SCOT) deficiency” J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. vol. 36 no. 6 pp. 983-987 Nov. 2013.

  • 36. Cotter D. G. Schugar R. C. and Crawford P. A. “Ketone body metabolism and cardiovascular disease.” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. vol. 304 no. 8 pp. H1060-76 Apr. 2013.

  • 37. Fukao T. et al. “Succinyl-CoA:3-Ketoacid CoA Transferase (SCOT): Cloning of the Human SCOT Gene Tertiary Structural Modeling of the Human SCOT Monomer and Characterization of Three Pathogenic Mutations” Genomics vol. 68 no. 2 pp. 144-151 Sep. 2000.

  • 38. Williamson D. H. Bates M. W. Page M. A. and Krebs H. A. “Activities of enzymes involved in acetoacetate utilization in adult mammalian tissues.” Biochem. J. vol. 121 no. 1 pp. 41-7 Jan. 1971.

  • 39. Tanaka H. Kohroki J. Iguchi N. Onishi M. and Nishimune Y. “Cloning and characterization of a human orthologue of testis-specific succinyl CoA: 3-oxo acid CoA transferase (Scot-t) cDNA” Mol. Hum. Reprod. vol. 8 no. 1 pp. 16-23 Jan. 2002.

  • 40. Matsubara Y. et al. “Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of cDNAs encoding the precursors of rat long chain acyl-coenzyme A short chain acyl-coenzyme A and isovaleryl-coenzyme A dehydrogenases. Sequence homology of four enzymes of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family.” J. Biol. Chem. vol. 264 no. 27 pp. 16321-31 Sep. 1989.

  • 41. Bixel M. G. Shimomura Y. Hutson S. M. and Hamprecht B. “Distribution of Key Enzymes of Branched-chain Amino Acid Metabolism in Glial and Neuronal Cells in Culture” vol. 49 no. 3 pp. 407-418 2001.

  • 42. Chen C.-H. Budas G. R. Churchill E. N. Disatnik M.-H. Hurley T. D. and Mochly-Rosen D. “Activation of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-2 Reduces Ischemic Damage to the Heart” Science (80-. ). vol. 321 no. 5895 pp. 1493-1495 Sep. 2008.

  • 43. Kedishvili N. Y. Popov K. M. Rougraff P. M. Zhao Y. Crabb D. W. and Harris R. A. “CoA-dependent methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase a unique member of the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily: cDNA cloning evolutionary relationships and tissue distribution” J. Biol. Chem. vol. 267 no. 27 pp. 19724-19729 1992.

  • 44. Allahverdiyev M. A. et al. “Aldehyde Dehydrogenase: Cancer and Stem Cells” in Dehydrogenases InTech 2012.

  • 45. Ohgami M. Takahashi N. Yamasaki M. and Fukui T. “Expression of acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase a novel cytosolic ketone body-utilizing enzyme in human brain.” Biochem. Pharmacol. vol. 65 no. 6 pp. 989-94 Mar. 2003.

  • 46. Minois N. “Molecular basis of the ‘anti-aging’ effect of spermidine and other natural polyamines – a mini-review.” Gerontology vol. 60 no. 4 pp. 319-26 2014.

  • 47. Eisenberg T. et al. “Induction of autophagy by spermidine promotes longevity” Nat. Cell Biol. vol. 11 no. 11 pp. 1305-1314 Nov. 2009.

  • 48. Zhang Y. et al. “Cerebral Microvascular Endothelial Cell Apoptosis after Ischemia: Role of Enolase-Phosphatase 1 Activation and Aci-Reductone Dioxygenase 1 Translocation” Front. Mol. Neurosci. vol. 9 p. 79 Aug. 2016.

  • 49. Sen G. L. Reuter J. A. Webster D. E. Zhu L. and Khavari P. A. “DNMT1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue” Nature vol. 463 no. 7280 pp. 563-567 Jan. 2010.

  • 50. PAN G. J. CHANG Z. Y. SCHÖLER H. R. and PEI D. “Stem cell pluripotency and transcription factor Oct4” Cell Res. vol. 12 no. 5-6 pp. 321-329 Dec. 2002.

  • 51. Shi G. and Jin Y. “Role of Oct4 in maintaining and regaining stem cell pluripotency” Stem Cell Res. Ther. vol. 1 no. 5 p. 39 Dec. 2010.

  • 52. Pan G. and Thomson J. A. “Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency” Cell Res. vol. 17 no. 1 pp. 42-49 Jan. 2007.

  • 53. Schwarz B. A. Bar-Nur O. Silva J. C. R. and Hochedlinger K. “Nanog Is Dispensable for the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells” Curr. Biol. vol. 24 no. 3 pp. 347-350 Feb. 2014.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 385 212 4
PDF Downloads 214 121 2